good luck getting an answer to that one... .. i have been asking him that since the day he started this.... i still think he;s closer to being a school janitor than any kind of medic....
But I know what the Bible says.
I have a question for you: In all the practice of neurology, where motor and sensory functions can be stimulated till the cows come home...has any neurologist been able to stimulate an abstract thought in a subject?
Words are spirit. God is the Word.
Let's just cut to the chase. You want me to deny what is revealed to us about the mind and spirit of man, and confess that identity, personalities and cogent thoughts are the product of chemistry.
I was acquainted with a gal in college who at times experienced sleep paralysis. She heard voices having conversions about her. She told me some of the vile things they discussed doing.
Now these are cogent thoughts. Evil thoughts. They're the product of an intelligence, or intelligences. Either her own evil intelligence or the intelligence of others. But one thing is sure. They're not the product of chemistry. It doesn't matter that pills can give relief. David's music gave relief to Saul, but the source of his torment was spiritual. (And no, it was NOT because of David's spirit. They looked for a skilled musician.)
I don't claim to understand it. I just accept it. I suspect, though, that it is a two-way street.
It's atheism that says we're just the products of chemistry. That all ailment, physical and mental, is due to some molecular defect or short circuit in the brain.
You can appeal to medical science and the illusion of modern advances all you want. You still have to deal with the First Century. Was the church in the First Century equipped to minister to diseases of the mind or not?
(Despite the assertions of atheistic science, the brain and the mind are not the same thing.)
Again, was the church in the First Century equipped to minister to diseases of the mind or not? If not, then you're asserting there is a new ailment, that people can experience a cruelty today unimaginable to past generations, and that Christ ill-equipped His church for the latter days, and you are the apostle of a new faith. If the first-century church was equipped, then the only thing that could have changed is the thinking.
You have no alternative.
What is it? Are you a more enlightened apostle of a new faith? Or are you merely expressing the change in thinking?