The King James Code

[Biblebeliever]

Since the root of the word "righteousness" is "right," this needs to be included since the other forms were declined.

Well yes, right is the root of the word righteousness. I understand that. But still what was discovered to add up to 555 times in the Scriptures is the word righteousness and all its varying forms.

Anyone can keep material out of their study to establish whatever they want.

Well I don't believe that was a motive in this work. That was not going on. What just happened was that taking particular words and doing a word count on them, he saw what the number count was. And of course that would include as in the example given already, words with their varying forms.

For instance,

The word lamb (lower case) for instance is found 77 times in the Authorized Version. While the word Lamb (Capitalized) is found 28 times.

The word Lamb's (Capitalized) is found 2 times in the King James Bible.

And the word lambs (lowercase, plural) is found 81 times in the King James Holy Bible.

 

[rsc2a]

A repeat:



Hmm...

In the scriptures, the number five is often associated with the subject of death. For instance, in the fifth chapter of Genesis (sometimes known as the obituary column of the bible) in the fifth verse after Adam's name was mentioned five times we are told that he died. All but five individuals in chapter five have their names mentioned exactly five times followed by the statement "and he died." Enoch was mentioned six times but he was translated that he should not see death. The lives of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth extended beyond the flood and their deaths are not recorded until later in the scriptures.
In addition, in 2nd Samuel several individuals were pierced under the fifth rib and subsequently died. Furthermore, in the book of Revelation, John recorded that when the fifth seal was loosed he saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God and the testimony they held.

There are five deaths mentioned in the scriptures: death of the body; second or eternal death; death in trespasses and sins; death to fellowship; and dead to sin. The one who has the power of death, Satan, has his name, Satan mentioned fifty five times in the scriptures. The desires of Satan are set forth for us as five "I wills" in Isaiah, chapter 14.

The pride of the flesh that is dead in trespasses and sins is illustrated in the five "I's" of the Pharisee. The excuses of the flesh nature is set forth in the five "I's" of Adam.

Next, there is a five-part covenant, sometimes called the covenant of redemption or covenant of grace, which shows forth God's remedy for death thru the death of his Son.
Jesus, whom God made to be sin for us, suffered five puncture wounds through his body as he suffered and died for the elect.

...well crap, there goes that theory.

(I figure actually discussing that the function of prime numbers could allow virtually anyone to say anything using "code" if they took 30 seconds. Of course, 3 is the number of perfection and 10 is the number of authority, so I have to be right.)

 

[The Rogue Tomato]

The word "Satan" occurs 49 times in the KJV.

The word "evil" occurs 707 times in the KJV. 

The word "adultery" occurs 33 times in the KJV. 

The word "sin" occurs 1218 times in the KJV (7x174)

The word "antichrist" occurs 4 times and "antichrists" 1 time, which adds up to 5, the number of grace.

In contrast, the word "righteousness" only occurs 307 times...not divisible by 7.

The word "godly" occurs 39 times.  Not divisible by 7.

The word "christ" (not "christ's" or "christs") occurs 538 times.  Not divisible by 7.

Obviously, the KJV is an evil translation.

UNIX is my friend.  "grep -ic <word> KJV.txt" for case insensitive searches.  "grep -c <word> KJV.txt" for case sensitive searches.  Easy peasey.

 

[FSSL]

Well yes, right is the root of the word righteousness. I understand that. But still what was discovered to add up to 555 times in the Scriptures is the word righteousness and all its varying forms.... Well I don't believe that was a motive in this work. That was not going on. What just happened was that taking particular words and doing a word count on them, he saw what the number count was. And of course that would include as in the example given already, words with their varying forms.

The most basic form of "righteousness" is "right." If he did not have wrong motives, then I guess we will just have to go the other route and charge him with being ignorant.

 

[Timothy]

and why is the number 555 so special?....... you can;t divide it evenly by 7.... you can only divide it by 1, 3 and 5.... and you can;t even add up any combination of those 3 numbers to make 7..... .. but you can add 2 of those numbers up to make 6 which biblical numerology proponents claim is the number for evil..... but then of course if you subtract one of those numbers from 5 and then add the other you come up with 7..... is that what they say makes it so special?.......... i really don;t get this......  i;ve looked at all the numbers they claim add up to a code and every one of them can be contributed to either chance.. naturally occurring coincidence... or manipulation of spelling and interchangeable words to make it look like a code.......

Easy. 1 for KJV + 1 for Me + 1 for Myself + 1 for I + 1 for cheap internet research.

You get 5 

 

[The Rogue Tomato]

 

[Biblebeliever]

And 2000 years ago, the saints thought the same thing. And 1000 years ago. And 500. And 100...

(I'm beginning to notice a theme here....)

But again, those very events are happening today at an alarming rate. It is not a matter of us thinking they are happening, because they are happening!

And Spanish. And German. And French. And Russian. And Arabic. And Swahili. And especially Mandarin Chinese...probably because it's so much more widely spoken than any other language....

Well yes, but those languages are not being sought after as much as Engish. It is English today that is a language that is very close to a universal language.

Chapter and verse please.

Here are three Scriptural passages that are about the word of God, and that testify to the fact that it is perfect:


7 The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the Lord is sure, making wise the simple. - Psalm 19:7 (KJV)


128 Therefore I esteem all thy precepts concerning all things to be right; and I hate every false way. - Psalm 119:128 (KJV)


17 Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth. - John 17:17 (KJV)

I agree!

Well, that is good.

It is very important to understand that a true Bible will always honour and exalt the Lord.

So you can provide examples of this in modern versions? I'll be waiting...

Micah 5:2​

KJV: But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands of Judah, yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel; whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting.

NIV: "But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times."

ESV: But you, O Bethlehem Ephrathah, who are too little to be among the clans of Judah, from you shall come forth for me one who is to be ruler in Israel, whose coming forth is from of old, from ancient days.

NLT: But you, O Bethlehem Ephrathah, are only a small village among all the people of Judah. Yet a ruler of Israel will come from you, one whose origins are from the distant past.


In Michah 5:2, the modern versions make a subtle attack on Jesus' deity, in that they give Jesus an origin. The KJV correctly teaches that Jesus is from everlasting.

1 Timothy 3:16​

KJV: And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.

NIV: Beyond all question, the mystery of godliness is great: He appeared in a body, was vindicated by the Spirit, was seen by angels, was preached among the nations, was believed on in the world, was taken up in glory.

ESV: Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of godliness: He was manifested in the flesh, vindicated by the Spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed among the nations, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.

NLT: Without question, this is the great mystery of our faith: Christ was revealed in a human body and vindicated by the Spirit. He was seen by angels and announced to the nations. He was believed in throughout the world and taken to heaven in glory.

Here we see that the KJV clearly states that it was God who was manifested in the flesh while the modern translations obscure the passage by removing and replacing "God" with "He." He appeared in a body? Well, just who appeared in a body? We've all appeared in a body. Come on now.

Daniel 3:25​

KJV: He answered and said, Lo, I see four men loose, walking in the midst of the fire, and they have no hurt; and the form of the fourth is like the Son of God.

NIV: He said, "Look! I see four men walking around in the fire, unbound and unharmed, and the fourth looks like a son of the gods."

ESV: He answered and said, “But I see four men unbound, walking in the midst of the fire, and they are not hurt; and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods.”

NLT: "Look!" Nebuchadnezzar shouted. "I see four men, unbound, walking around in the fire unharmed! And the fourth looks like a god!"

The fourth person in that fiery furnace was the Lord Jesus Christ. But the modern versions take out "Son of God," thereby, removing an important reference to the Lord Jesus Christ and His deity in the Old Testament.

1 John 5:7​

KJV: For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

NIV: For there are three that testify:

ESV: For there are three that testify:

NLT: So we have these three witnesses--


1 John 5:7 is one of the strongest verses in Scripture that supports the Godhead. Therefore attesting further to Jesus' deity. It's no surprise then that the modern versions would also corrupt and water down this verse, attacking the Godhead (trinity). While the word "trinity" is not in the Bible, the word "Godhead" is. In the King James Bible, "Godhead" appears three times. Acts 17:29, Romans 1:20, and Colossians 2:9.

Revelation 1:6​

KJV: And hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father; to him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.

NIV: and has made us to be a kingdom and priests to serve his God and Father--to him be glory and power for ever and ever! Amen.

ESV: and made us a kingdom, priests to his God and Father, to him be glory and dominion forever and ever. Amen.

NLT: He has made us a Kingdom of priests for God his Father. All glory and power to him forever and ever! Amen.

In Revelation 1:6, it is the Lord Jesus who makes us kings and priests unto Himself (God) and His Father. This is another strong & clear verse in the KJV that proves that Jesus Christ is God.


The modern versions reworded this verse very subtily to weaken the doctrine of the deity of Jesus Christ.

Matthew 20:20​

KJV: Then came to him the mother of Zebedee's children with her sons, worshipping him, and desiring a certain thing of him.

NIV: Then the mother of Zebedee's sons came to Jesus with her sons and, kneeling down, asked a favor of him.

ESV: Then the mother of the sons of Zebedee came up to him with her sons, and kneeling before him she asked him for something.

NLT: Then the mother of James and John, the sons of Zebedee, came to Jesus with her sons. She knelt respectfully to ask a favor.


The mother of Zebedee's children and her sons worshipped Jesus. You see Rsc2a, anyone can bow down or kneel before someone without worshiping them. Again, the King James Version gives the correct reading and honors Jesus as God, while the
NIV, NLT, and ESV attempt to strip the Lord Jesus of His deity.


There are many more that I could reference. But I will conclude by showing a very serious and Satanic attack that the modern versions make on Jesus' deity in Isaiah 14:12.

Isaiah 14:12 ​

New International Version
How you have fallen from heaven, morning star, son of the dawn! You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations!

New Living Translation
"How you are fallen from heaven, O shining star, son of the morning! You have been thrown down to the earth, you who destroyed the nations of the world.

English Standard Version
“How you are fallen from heaven, O Day Star[/color], son of Dawn! How you are cut down to the ground, you who laid the nations low!

New American Standard Bible
"How you have fallen from heaven, O star of the morning, son of the dawn! You have been cut down to the earth, You who have weakened the nations!

Notice that in the modern versions, how they make Jesus and Lucifer one. Jesus Christ is the Morning Star. Read Revelation 22:16. The modern versions don't have Lucifer getting kicked out of Heaven, but instead they have Jesus getting kicked out of Heaven!!!

Now let's see what the true Bible says:

King James Bible
How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! (Isaiah 14:12)

It was Lucifer who fell from Heaven. Just as the Authorized King James Bible says.

I'm guessing which version of the KJV you happened to be referring to but here you go:

For the Lord thy God bringeth thee into a good land, a land of brooks of water, of fountains and depths that spring out of valleys and hills; A land of wheat, and barley, and vines, and fig trees, and pomegranates; a land of oil olive, and honey; A land wherein thou shalt eat bread without scarceness, thou shalt not lack any thing in it; a land whose stones are iron, and out of whose hills thou mayest dig brass. - Deut 8:7-9

There is only one King James Version. Not two or three.

 

[Timothy]

There is only one King James Version. Not two or three.

Wow! I have like 6 or so in my household. Probably 100 in the pews at Church. I am not an expert, but I would say there are probably over 1 million KJVs in the world!!!!!!!!!

 

[rsc2a]

And 2000 years ago, the saints thought the same thing. And 1000 years ago. And 500. And 100...

(I'm beginning to notice a theme here....)

But again, those very events are happening today at an alarming rate. It is not a matter of us thinking they are happening, because they are happening!

And 2000 years ago, the saints thought the same thing. And 1000 years ago. And 500. And 100...

[quote author=Biblebeliever][quote author=rsc2a]And Spanish. And German. And French. And Russian. And Arabic. And Swahili. And especially Mandarin Chinese...probably because it's so much more widely spoken than any other language....[/quote]

Well yes, but those languages are not being sought after as much as Engish[/quote]

Chinese definitely is. Spanish quite possibly.

[quote author=Biblebeliever]It is English today that is a language that is very close to a universal language. [/quote]

And I don't think you know what "universal" means. By far, the most popular language spoken is Mandarin Chinese. (Actually, if you count the other forms of "Chinese", you'll have to add again another several 100M more speakers...)

[quote author=Biblebeliever][quote author=rsc2a]
Chapter and verse please.[/quote]

Here are three Scriptural passages that are about the word of God, and that testify to the fact that it is perfect...[/quote]

Yes. They say it is perfect. You were supposed to provide me with a definition of what a perfect Bible is according to Scripture.


[quote author=Biblebeliever][quote author=rsc2a]So you can provide examples of this in modern versions? I'll be waiting...[/quote]

KJV: But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands of Judah, yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel; whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting.

NIV: "But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times."

ESV: But you, O Bethlehem Ephrathah, who are too little to be among the clans of Judah, from you shall come forth for me one who is to be ruler in Israel, whose coming forth is from of old, from ancient days.

NLT: But you, O Bethlehem Ephrathah, are only a small village among all the people of Judah. Yet a ruler of Israel will come from you, one whose origins are from the distant past.


In Michah 5:2, the modern versions make a subtle attack on Jesus' deity, in that they give Jesus an origin. The KJV correctly teaches that Jesus is from everlasting.

...

There are many more that I could reference. But I will conclude by showing a very serious and Satanic attack that the modern versions make on Jesus' deity...[/quote]

KJV:No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.

ESV: No one has ever seen God; the only God, who is at the Father’s side, he has made him known.

The KJV clearly is attacking the deity of Jesus here since the modern versions explicitly call Jesus "God" and the KJV only calls him "begotten Son".

We should toss the KJV out as being a tool of Satan.  :


[quote author=Biblebeliever][quote author=rsc2a]I'm guessing which version of the KJV you happened to be referring to but here you go:

For the Lord thy God bringeth thee into a good land, a land of brooks of water, of fountains and depths that spring out of valleys and hills; A land of wheat, and barley, and vines, and fig trees, and pomegranates; a land of oil olive, and honey; A land wherein thou shalt eat bread without scarceness, thou shalt not lack any thing in it; a land whose stones are iron, and out of whose hills thou mayest dig brass. - Deut 8:7-9
[/quote]


There is only one King James Version. Not two or three.[/quote]

That's right. There's only one...except that "one" seems to change quite a bit depending on which "one" you happen to pick up.

 

[Biblebeliever]

There is only one King James Version. Not two or three.

Wow! I have like 6 or so in my household. Probably 100 in the pews at Church. I am not an expert, but I would say there are probably over 1 million KJVs in the world!!!!!!!!!

Hello there Timothy.  I should have clarified a little what I meant. 


I understand that there are millions of copies of the Authorized King James Version.

What I was simply referring to is the fact that there are no revisions of the Authorized Version.  There are several editions of the Authorized King James Version.  But again, there are no revisions.

 

[christundivided]

There is only one King James Version. Not two or three.

Wow! I have like 6 or so in my household. Probably 100 in the pews at Church. I am not an expert, but I would say there are probably over 1 million KJVs in the world!!!!!!!!!

Hello there Timothy.  I should have clarified a little what I meant. 


I understand that there are millions of copies of the Authorized King James Version.

What I was simply referring to is the fact that there are no revisions of the Authorized Version.  There are several editions of the Authorized King James Version.  But again, there are no revisions.

The english word edition.....

"a particular form or version of a published text"

Edition... by definition implies "revision"

 

[Timothy]

There is only one King James Version. Not two or three.

Wow! I have like 6 or so in my household. Probably 100 in the pews at Church. I am not an expert, but I would say there are probably over 1 million KJVs in the world!!!!!!!!!

Hello there Timothy.  I should have clarified a little what I meant. 


I understand that there are millions of copies of the Authorized King James Version.

What I was simply referring to is the fact that there are no revisions of the Authorized Version.  There are several editions of the Authorized King James Version.  But again, there are no revisions.

Is the mass production of the King James Version text an ignorant way to treat the preserved word of God?

Seems odd ... millions of Bibles all divinely blessed with God's own perfect words.

 

[Smellin Coffee]

New International Version
How you have fallen from heaven, morning star, son of the dawn! You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations!

New Living Translation
"How you are fallen from heaven, O shining star, son of the morning! You have been thrown down to the earth, you who destroyed the nations of the world.

English Standard Version
“How you are fallen from heaven, O Day Star[/color], son of Dawn! How you are cut down to the ground, you who laid the nations low!

New American Standard Bible
"How you have fallen from heaven, O star of the morning, son of the dawn! You have been cut down to the earth, You who have weakened the nations!

Notice that in the modern versions, how they make Jesus and Lucifer one. Jesus Christ is the Morning Star. Read Revelation 22:16. The modern versions don't have Lucifer getting kicked out of Heaven, but instead they have Jesus getting kicked out of Heaven!!!

Now let's see what the true Bible says:

King James Bible
How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! (Isaiah 14:12)

It was Lucifer who fell from Heaven. Just as the Authorized King James Bible says.

Since you take Isaiah 14 as literal about an angelic creature instead of allegory about the earthly king (probably Sennacherib), what do you do about the rest of the passage? Is it literal or allegorical?

19 But thou art cast out of thy grave like an abominable branch, and as the raiment of those that are slain, thrust through with a sword, that go down to the stones of the pit; as a carcase trodden under feet.

Lucifer had a grave and a corpse that was mutilated after death.

20 Thou shalt not be joined with them in burial, because thou hast destroyed thy land, and slain thy people: the seed of evildoers shall never be renowned.

Lucifer owned property that was destroyed and had progeny.

21 Prepare slaughter for his children for the iniquity of their fathers; that they do not rise, nor possess the land, nor fill the face of the world with cities.

More evidence of progeny.

22 For I will rise up against them, saith the Lord of hosts, and cut off from Babylon the name, and remnant, and son, and nephew, saith the Lord.

God promises revenge against his progeny.

23 I will also make it a possession for the bittern, and pools of water: and I will sweep it with the besom of destruction, saith the Lord of hosts.

Lucifer's land was destroyed and given to another.

Proper context shows this passage is not a literal account about the fall of Satan, regardless of the version.

 

[Baptist City Holdout]

This numerological emphasis a heresy every bit as dangerous as the latin mass.  Rather than focus on what the Bible plainly says, understood in context, it sends people searching for "deeper" truths in the Bible, and thus separates people from scripture's content all the while enforcing in their minds that they are truly Bible believers.  It's akin to the Pharisees arguing over how many angels could dance on the head of a needle.  It's like trying to understand the forrest by looking at tree bark under a microscope. 
By dwelling on these "deeper truths" these men are setting themselves up as "experts" and "scholars" who can pretty much teach whatever they want and people will swallow it because of their obvious "deeper knowledge."  They can use these tricks to manipulate and bring loyalty to themselves and their crowd. 
I'm a King James guy.  I've never preached a single message out of anything but the King James, and I don't own anything but a King James Bible.  (Besides my greek texts and some versions that came bundled with Bible software that I never use.)  But I focus on preaching the CONTENT, not the COVER.  Because it is the content that is inspired by God and profitable and that makes the Christian perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.  Not the cover.
Rather than add authority to the scripture, this kind of biblioltry (I've never used that word before, but that's what it is) takes authority away from scripture and puts it on an man.

If I knew a better way to say, "What he said," I would!

 

[Biblebeliever]

To further help you Timothy in clarifying what I meant, here is a video where brother Will Kinney responds to James White's question:

[size=12pt]Answering James White - Which KJV?​

​

Question for James White, Which KJB?​

Also, you can click on the link given below to read Will Kinney's article which corresponds with the video above.


Answering James White - Which KJV?

Answering James White’s Question - Which King James Version is the infallible words of God?



http://brandplucked.webs.com/answerwhitewhichkjb.htm

 

[PappaBear]

Biblebeliever, do you believe in plenary inspiration?

 

[Biblebeliever]

Biblebeliever, do you believe in plenary inspiration?

Goodevening sir,

Yes I do believe in Verbal Plenary Inspiration.

 

[PappaBear]

Biblebeliever, do you believe in plenary inspiration?

Goodevening sir,

Yes I do believe in Verbal Plenary Inspiration.

Good evening!  *Hat tip </)

I also believe in Verbal Plenary Inspiration.  Considering the plenary part, do you find any scriptural example or justification for numeric coding?  If indeed such coding is to be found, surely the Bible which is intended to throughly furnish us unto all good works will give some sort of direction or illustration regarding this?  If not, then it is extra-biblical and should not be supported by Christians.

 

[Biblebeliever]

Good evening!  *Hat tip </)

Thank you sir, I apreciate that.

I also believe in Verbal Plenary Inspiration.  Considering the plenary part, do you find any scriptural example or justification for numeric coding?  If indeed such coding is to be found, surely the Bible which is intended to throughly furnish us unto all good works will give some sort of direction or illustration regarding this?  If not, then it is extra-biblical and should not be supported by Christians.

Now to answer your question, I want to answer it in two parts.

I do find many examples in the Scriptures of God using numbers.

Now I understand that the main concern here is whether or not the Numeric codes are Scriptural. Well for one thing, the Numerical codes and patterns which I listed earlier are indeed in the Authorized King James Bible. Anyone can look those words and phrases up and verify that this is the case. Therefore, these Numerical Codes are definitely interwoven in the Holy Scriptures.

Also, one way to know that the study of Bible Numerics is Scriptural, is simply knowing what Bible Numerology is. Bible Numerology is basically the study and also the discerning of the meaning a number has in the Scriptures.

For instance, just take the number 3. The number three (3) can be seen greatly throughout the whole Scripture. Consider the Godhead (one God in three persons, yet still just one God). Furthermore, God is all powerful (omnipotent), all knowing (omniscient) and present in every place at the same time (omnipresent). Hence, the number 3 can be seen as the number of divine perfection in the Holy Scriptures.


Now take the numer 6. The number six (6) is considered the number of man or mankind in the Scriptures since man was created on the sixth day. Also we find a direct reference to a number of a man in Revelation 13:18:


18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six. - Revelation 13:18 (King James Bible)



Notice that (666), three 6's represent a sort of unholy trinity. Remember Satan counterfeits everything that God creates. So the number 6 in the Scriptures can be seen as a number representing mankind and imperfection.

Also, the example just given of Rev. 13:18 can be seen as a clear illustration of how a number is used in the Scriptures. And that's why when a Christian begins to study Bible Prophecy, they discover the importance that Numbers in the Holy Bible have in terms of Bible Prophecy. It is a very interesting study indeed.


In addition, take the Number 7 (which is cosidered the Number of Complete Perfection) in the Holy Scriptures. Study how God uses the Number 7 greatly in the book of Revelation alone.

The word "seven" appears exactly 54 times in the book of Revelation in the King James Bible.

The following is mentioned in the book of Revelation in sevens:



- seven angels    (Rev. 8:2, 8:6, 15:1, 15:6, 15:7, 15:8, 16:1, 17:1, 21:9)

- seven Spirits    (Rev. 1:4, 3:1, 4:5, 5:6)

- seven candlesticks    (Rev. 1:13, 1:20)

- seven golden candlesticks    (Rev. 1:12, 1:20, 2:1)   

- seven churches     (Rev. 1:4, 1:11, 1:20)

- seven crowns    (Rev. 12:3)

- seven heads     (Rev. 12:3, 13:1, 17:3, 17:7, 17:9)

- seven horns    (Rev. 5:6)

- seven lamps    (Rev. 4:5)

- seven mountains    (Rev. 17:9)

- seven seals    (Rev. 5:1, 5:5)

- seven plagues     (Rev. 15:6, 15:8)

- seven stars     (Rev. 1:16, 1:20, 2:1, 3:1)

- seven thunders    (Rev. 10:3, 10:4)

- seven trumpets    (Rev. 8:2, 8:6)

- seven vials    (Rev. 17:1, 21:9,

- seven golden vials    (Rev. 15:7)


And that is just in the book of Revelation!


Therefore as you can see sir, just by studying the amount of times that God uses a certain number in the Scriptures can give you further insight on God's character and the importance he places on numbers in the Scriptures. Also, it should be noted that God even named a book in the Bible (His Holy Book) "Numbers."


For the second part in my answer to your question sir, is that before I learned about the fascinating study of Bible Numerics, I was already a King James Bible believer. In other words, I became convinced that the Authorized King James Bible was and is God's pure, perfect and inerrant word just after a few months of studying the Bible Version Issue. And it was probably a year to two years after I had become a King James Bible believer that I learned about the King James Code and Bible Numerics.

And I simply see the Bible Numerical codes as more evidence of God's hand being on the Authorized King James Holy Bible. I see these codes as internal witnesses.


Also Sir, have you looked into this issue of Scriptural Numerics? Have you read the King James Code? Or By Divine Order (Scripture Numerics and Bible Prophecy) by Mike Hoggard?

There has actually been many books written on the subject of Bible Numerics. There is even a book titled "Biblical Mathematics."

While I am aware that you are not a fan of Peter S. Ruckman, I still wanted to mention that he also wrote a book on this subject titled "Bible Numerics."

I do encourage you to at least pray about this subject and to read one of those books I referenced, that is if the Lord leads you to.

And if as you are reading one of those books, if you can see and discern that the Holy Spirit is confirming the truths contained therein, then there is your confirmation.

 

[The Rogue Tomato]

I repeat:

The word "Satan" occurs 49 times in the KJV.

The word "evil" occurs 707 times in the KJV. 

The word "adultery" occurs 33 times in the KJV. 

The word "sin" occurs 1218 times in the KJV (7x174)

The word "antichrist" occurs 4 times and "antichrists" 1 time, which adds up to 5, the number of grace.

In contrast, the word "righteousness" only occurs 307 times...not divisible by 7.

The word "godly" occurs 39 times.  Not divisible by 7.

The word "christ" (not "christ's" or "christs") occurs 538 times.  Not divisible by 7.

Obviously, based on numerology, the KJV is an evil translation.