rsc2a said:
My point is that your "proof" vis-a-vis the rapture is a non-sequitur. As to when it will occur, I don't worry about it. I try to live every day for God regardless of when He returns. (And I assume that your understanding of the parousia is a lot different than mine.)
Okay, and continue living for God and Serve Him with fear and trembling. Because the Rapture is so very close.
rsc2a said:
Well I looked up that link which you gave. And this is what I found: List of most widely spoken languages (by number of countries)
And do you know which Language is at the Number 1 Rank? Well if you don't, then just click on the link below to find out:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_widely_spoken_languages_(by_number_of_countries)
rsc2a said:
No thanks. You are the one who said you are using "the definition of a perfect Bible according to the Scripture".
I'm simply asking you to provide chapter and verse, something you haven't done. You've given me plenty of verses where God says his word is perfect, but not that actually define what that means.
Yes I have provided you with Scripture where it says God
Psalm 19:7
Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
7 The law of the Lord is
perfect, converting the soul:
the testimony of the Lord is sure, making wise the simple.
Psalm 33:4
Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
4 For
the word of the Lord is right;
and
all his works are done in truth.
Psalm 119:128
Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
128 Therefore I esteem
all thy precepts concerning all things to be right;
and I hate every false way.
2 Samuel 22:31
Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
31
As for God, his way is perfect;
the word of the Lord is tried:
he is a buckler to all them that trust in him.
Psalm 18:30
Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
30
As for God, his way is perfect:
the word of the Lord is tried:
he is a buckler to all those that trust in him.
Psalm 12:6-7
Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
6
The words of the Lord are pure words:
as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.
7
Thou shalt keep them, O Lord,
thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.
Proverbs 30:5-6
Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
5
Every word of God is pure:
he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him.
6 Add thou not unto his words,
lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar.
John 17:17
Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
17 Sanctify them through
thy truth: thy word is truth.
Those Scriptures clearly teach that the word of God is pure, inerrant and perfect.
Every word of God is pure.
The Bible is the pure, perfect, infallible, and inerrant word of God. And I have it. Praise be to God Almighty.
rsc2a said:
You defend the King Jimmy because you believe it doesn't attack the deity of Jesus in certain passages because it uses phrasing that clearly affirms the deity of Jesus where the other translations do not. Yet you attack other translations because they use phrasing in certain passages that clearly affirms the deity of Jesus where the King Jimmy is much less clear.
In short, you are applying a double standard.
King Jimmy??? Who is King Jimmy???
I know who King James is, but not king jimmy.
I defend the King James Bible because it exalts the Lord Jesus Christ. The King James Bible is the God honoured text.
And the modern Vatican versions such as the NIV (Non Inspired Version), ESV (Ecumenical Satanic Vacuum), NASB (New American Satanic Bible), etc. attack the deity and person of the Lord Jesus Christ. And this fact has been proved time and time again. And yet Lukewarm, carnal Christians still prefer these Vatican and satanic bibles.
rsc2a said:
You don't know anything about Arian and/or Gnostic beliefs, do you?
Sure I do. Arianism is the heretical teaching that the Son of God did not always exist, but had a beginning.
Arius was the heretic which taught that God the Father and the Son did not exist together eternally.
rsc2a said:
Simple. Does your KJV look
like this?
You are aware that the English Language in 1611 was a bit different than it is today don't you??? For one English Spelling in 1611 had not yet been standardized.
rsc2a said:
And you still haven't addressed all the posts I've provided where another Bible-code KJVo-ist says that 5 is the number for death. You keep saying it's the number for grace. Both of you have about the same amount of validity regarding this point and it's really going to affect how you interpret your code. (i.e. none at all)
Well I most likely missed them. Why don't you send me a link to those posts where you mentioned this.