graceandtruth said:
I here you guys loud and clear. I also understand that state laws must be obeyed.
Samspade made a good point that salvation should cause us to care for others but doesn't this go both ways?
I am looking for the biblical sanction in this "private" versus corporate ministry model offered. If someone chose this model for convenience most of us would consider this unacceptable but for our convenience it becomes the model of choice.
I know there were some that were upset by the comparison of Saul prior to salvation to sex offenders but I am sure that Stephen's family was not happy with the decision to include Paul in the membership of the Church and not only that but recognize him as an Apostle and his writings as Holy Scripture. It appears that no option was given to those who didn't like it and the first church split had not occurred yet so there was no Second __________ Church to move to.
So again I understand the human angst. I understand the concern for those who have been victims of the sin in question but I do not see where the Bible disqualifies those who engage in sexual sins from particular ministries but I do see where the perverts in Corinth were declared to be washed, sanctified, and justified. I am not having trouble with the human reasoning for exclusion but I am having a problem finding biblical sanction for exclusion of sex offenders but not murderers, muggers, carjackers, etc. I would assume that a person who has had someone kill their family member would have a problem with a murderer attending and participating in ministry as well. So where do we draw the line of exclusion and what is our guide.
Thanks for the answers and understanding.
Every sex offender is loved by someone, I'm sure.
There are 'tiers' of sexual crimes in many states....from rape to child molestation to child porn offenses.
Many churches do allow some sex offenders to attend under constant supervision, and I have no problem with their doing such. However, in the case in the OP, this gentleman was a pastor, raped the woman regularly over a period of a year, usually in the church offices, showing her porn.
Our leadership did have some conflicting opinions at first, but the more we learned of the details and the more we heard from parents, it became obvious that, for the good of the ministry we had to ask the man to leave.