- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 847
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 0
Binaca Chugger said:Just John said:Binaca Chugger said:bgwilkinson said:RAIDER said:Tom Brennan said:I meant that b/c younger pastors do not feel like questions are welcomed/encouraged by the movers/shakers of fundamentalism that they sometimes grow to think that those same leaders don't want to hear questions because they don't have any answers. Young preachers are often like teenagers. They are growing into themselves, and into their own mind, and wonder 'why?' a lot. If they aren't given the room by some wise old man to ask that, and then given answers by wise old men they may just jump ship to a different Christian boat.
I believe that was a weakness at HAC. It was a "Here is what we believe and if you believe different you had better be quiet about it or we will show you the door". Now, I do understand that philosophy to a point. Without some level of that rule things could be a real mess.
It would have been nice to have more open discussions in some classes. A great example would have been the KJV issue. When I was at HAC you could not promote the KJV as God's perfect, inspired, preserved Word. I had a friend that believed just that. If you spoke out you would have been branded a Ruckmanite and shown the door. It would have been nice if there would have been a class where topics such as this could have been viewed and discussed from both angles with the view of HAC being the one promoted.
Yes Bro. Hyles was a my way or the highway kinda guy. guy He often said I may have been wrong one time, I just don't remember when that might have been.
We should not be dogmatic about doubtful things. It makes one look like an idiot.
One should be able to support ones views with historically accurate facts, if not just remain silent.
The statement is a joke. It was always said "tongue-in-cheek." Context in king. You are developing a habit of (willfully?) taking things out of context to promote your opinion. I know someone else who had such a habit. His story is quite public and a matter of record.
Certainly it's an old joke, one that most of us have probably heard. But if said often enough and more importantly exhibited in actions and other words it does make one look like an idiot.
So you don't like people repeating jokes. Ok. That hardly makes one guilty of the attributes the poster was attempting to ascribe him because he told a joke.
My point is that many people are pulling things out of context in efforts to promote untruth, or their version of truth. This truly is bearing false witness.
WOW! Talking about taking things out of context to "promote your version of the truth"! Do I need to break down my sentences for you or do you just want to concede you might be taking my words out of context?