*sigh*It was through Sept 10th. Of course the reason why you can't answer why there are vaccines with well beyond three deaths still actively used, is because there is no universal standard like there is in your Land of Make Believe. You have been misusing VAERS in trying to twist the data into confirmed deaths caused by the vaccine in the same way I've been twisting the data on aspirin and the three vaccines to claim the deaths reported were confirmed deaths caused by the medication or vaccine. The truth is VAERS is a lot of noise without context. For instance around 2,200 people a day have a heart attack. If you mass vaccinate a large portion of the nation in a short period of time a lot of those heart attacks will occur within a few weeks of the vaccination. Unlike other vaccines doctors are required to report adverse events with the COVID vaccine. So an individual or doctor does not know if the heart attack was related so they report it. The CDC then can compare demographics and statistical occurrences in the general population to occurrences in the vaccinated. In other words they can filter out the noise and see the side effects that may truly be caused by the vaccine.
You can see evidence of them do exactly that. The J&J vaccine was paused and now carries a warning label for a particular demographic based on incidents that were discovered through the "filtering" process of the data. In the same way a warning label is carried for you men with Pfizer based on rare heart inflammation. I've yet to hear any on the conspiracy theorist side explain why these two issues were not covered up? If their is some crafty plan to cover up severe side effects seems like it would be easy enough for such a far reaching cabal to cover up these two rare side effects so they can continue there evil plan.
The point was NOT that three deaths or 50 GBS cases were the magic numbers. The point was, and I repeat myself, the thousands of reported deaths with the covid vaccines are marginalized when previously a comparatively very few number of deaths and complications would have been a show stopper even in a panic.
You can find no comparison. Even if there were a comparison, there were no mandates. And someone was liable.
So STAHP with the ridiculous assertion that this vax program is anything like what was done in the past.
McCullough is right, you are wrong.
Also, 'through september' is not a range of dates.