The King James Code

[Biblebeliever]

The King James Code - 7 The Sacred Number


By Pastor Mike Hoggard

THE KING JAMES CODE - 7 THE SACRED NUMBER part 2 1/6​

Here is a brief excerpt from Mike Hoggard's book: The King James Code



"Allow me to display some of the 7 related patterns in column form. In this first column, we will list the various titles and attributes given to God and His Son Jesus, followed by the number of times that particular phrase is mentioned in the KJV."

Son of Man 196 times (49x4)
Jesus Christ 196 times (49x4)
Word of God 49 times (7x7)
Son of God 49 times in the New Testament (only once in OT)
Most High 49 times
The Word of the Lord 245 times (49x5)
The Word 7 times
Husbandman 7 times
My Beloved Son 7 times
His Son 7 times
Firstborn 7 times
Thy Word 7 times in the New Testament
"It is Written" 63 times (7x9) in the New Testament
Jesus and Grace 49 times in the same verse
Holy Spirit 7 times
Breath (form of Spirit) 42 times (6x7)
Thunders (God’s voice) 7 times
God of Israel 203 times (7x29)


"I will now list for you the various names that are identified with the Church, along with the number of times they are mentioned in the scriptures. Many of these have not previously been mentioned."


Church 77 times (as in the 77 generations of Luke 3)
Kingdom of God 70 times, found only in the New Testament
Assembly 49 times
Bride 14 times
Firstfruits 7 times in the New Testament
Daughter of Zion (or Sion) 28 times (7x4)
Daughter of Jerusalem 7 times
Daughters of Jerusalem 7 times (all in the Song of Solomon, found only one other time in Luke 23:28)
Children of Israel 644 times (7x92)
Congregation 49 times in the Book of Exodus
Tabernacle of the Congregation 21 times in Exodus (7x3)
56 times in Numbers (7x8)
Witnesses 49 times
Fishers (as in fishers of men) 7 times
Peculiar 7 times
Kinsmen 7 times
Worshippers 7 times
Workmanship 7 times


- Mike Hoggard (The King James Code)

 

[Patebald]

I don't get it. What's the point?

 

[Biblebeliever]

I don't get it. What's the point?

It is to reveal God's Signature of Textual and Numerical Patterns in the Authorized King James Bible. To show that there are internal witnesses within the text of the Authorized Version, bearing fact that it is a Supernatural Book.

You see Pate, no man on the fact of this earth could design these Numerical codes and patterns that are in the Authorized Version.

 

[Biblebeliever]

Here is another excerpt of Brother Mike Hoggard's book: The King James Code.

The King James Code

By Mike Hoggard

​

The Number Seven


I have decided to save the best for last. You may have, by now, seen some things you have never seen before, but it hasn’t been enough to put you over the edge of belief just yet. What follows in this last chapter is, without a doubt, the most incredible set of codes and patterns that you have ever seen. The number 7 is God’s very own number. If His Word is going to have an association with any number, it would be this one. Please read very carefully, and let the Spirit guide you into all wisdom and knowledge.

The number 7 is associated with God, and with Divine completion and perfection. It has become apparent to most who read the scriptures, that the number 7 is the most significant number in all of the scriptures. It is the number most often mentioned when you ask someone to give them a number out of the Bible. As a person reads the Bible, they often encounter this number and conclude that there must be some very special significance to the use of this number in the passage that they are reading. With that in mind, it stands to reason that there must be some extremely important patterns that are associated with the number 7. As you read through this section, you will understand that the use of the number 7 in the King James Version, is what sets it apart from the other English translations. Here are many of the various patterns associated with the number 7.

The very first version of the written Word of God was a little, two tablet book commonly called The Ten Commandments. They are the basis of the laws that govern this great nation. The devil is increasing his attack on the Ten Commandments because of what they represent. God has placed a very important value on the Ten Commandments, for, we find them located in the 70th chapter of the Bible, Exodus 20. The Bible mentions that they were written on "tables of stone." In fact, the Bible mentions 14 (7x2) times that they are written on tables of stone.
As I mentioned earlier, it is very clear that the words, phrases, verses, chapters and books of the scriptures have been arranged in a perfect order. It would be impossible for men to manipulate a group of documents in this manner, especially men who, in many cases, lived thousands of years apart. One pattern that I discovered about the Divine arrangement of the Scriptures was revealed to me as I read Genesis 1:1. This verse details the beginning of the creation of God. Notice it is in the first book of the Bible, the first chapter, the first verse. The first things always belong to God. I remembered that there was another place where there is a similar passage. It is in John 1:1. Notice that it also begins with "In the beginning", that it is in chapter 1, and verse 1, but what about the book. It is not the first book of the New Testament. However, from Genesis to Luke, there are exactly 42 (7x6) books. This makes John the first book of a whole new set!

How do we know which Bible to use? The bible you use must be the true "Word of God." We are told that Jesus is the Word of God in John 1:1. He is also given that title in I John 5:7 "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one." It seems odd that most of the modern translations omit verse7, or place a question mark by it in the form of a note that says that this passage does not appear in some Greek texts! The phrase "word of God" is found exactly 49 times (7x7) in the Authorized Version of the Bible!

Jesus and the Bible are forever linked together. They are in reality, the same thing. He is truly the Word of God. The title of "the Word" that is given to Jesus is found exactly 7 times in 5 verses, including being found in I John chapter 5 verse 7! They are listed below.

(John 1:1) "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God."
(John 1:14) "And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth."

(1 John 1:1) "That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, of the Word of life;"
(1 John 5:7) "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one."

(Rev 19:13) "And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God."

These verses are copied exactly as they are found in the Scriptures. I have added emphasis to some of the words, but have not changed them in any other form. The capitalized "w" at the beginning of "Word" was put there by the translators, but was not contained in the Greek manuscripts. Do we yet not believe that the Hand of the Almighty was on these men as they compiled and translated this sacred Book? Does the Bible you read and trust in contain this Divine pattern?

The number 49, being the product of 7x7 is a tremendous number, for it compounds the idea of completion that we find in the number 7. This very equation is found right in the text of the scriptures themselves.

(Lev 25:8) "And thou shalt number seven sabbaths of years unto thee, seven times seven years; and the space of the seven sabbaths of years shall be unto thee forty and nine years."

Since this number was so important to God, it is very reasonable to assume that His Word and His Son should be associated with this number. It reveals to us in these last days, exactly who His Son is, and now reveals to us which Bible is His truly inspired Word.
The Bible itself states that the Word of God is a book of parables. The word "parable" is found 49 times. The word "parable" is found 7 times in the book of Numbers. All of them are found in chapters 23 and 24, and all of them are spoken by Balaam, the first time being found in verse 7 because, (Num 23:5-7) "…the LORD put a word in Balaam's mouth, and said, Return unto Balak, and thus thou shalt speak. {6} And he returned unto him, and, lo, he stood by his burnt sacrifice, he, and all the princes of Moab. {7} And he took up his parable, and said, Balak the king of Moab hath brought me from Aram, out of the mountains of the east, saying, Come, curse me Jacob, and come, defy Israel." In Psalm 78, we are told that God speaks his Word by means of the parable, (Psa 78:1-2) "Maschil of Asaph. Give ear, O my people, to my law: incline your ears to the words of my mouth. {2} I will open my mouth in a parable: I will utter dark sayings of old:". And we are also told that all the words of Jesus are in parable form, (Mat 13:34) "All these things spake Jesus unto the multitude in parables; and without a parable spake he not unto them:".

It was Paul who warned us about a false gospel.

(Gal 1:8-9) "But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. {9} As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed."

Notice that this warning was so strong that he mentions it twice to get the point across. There is a difference between the real Word of God, and the false gospel. Paul and Peter made sure that we understood this, because they spoke of The gospel of God. This phrase is found exactly 7 times in the scriptures. The 7th time it is used is an indication of what will happen to those who do not obey the real gospel.
(1 Pet 4:17) "For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God: and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God?"

As we have seen before, the Holy Spirit is represented elsewhere in the scriptures as being the "breath" of God. God tells us in Ezekiel 37:14 that He will "put my breath in you, and ye shall live." In Genesis, God did this with Adam. (Gen 2:7) "And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul." This is the first place we find the word "breath". Notice that it is in verse 7. The word "breath" is found 42 times. God took the number for man (6) and multiplied it by the number for God (7).

In the two listings of the lineage of Jesus Christ is the manifestation of 7 displayed. The account given for us in Matthew chapter 1 lists 42 (6x7) generations from Abraham. The account given for us in Luke chapter 3 lists 77 generations from God who created Adam, the first "son of God", to Jesus, the "true Son of God." Jesus’ title of "Son of God" in its various forms is found 49 (7x7) times in the New Testament. It is found only one time in the Old Testament, recorded in the book of Daniel.
(Dan 3:25) "He answered and said, Lo, I see four men loose, walking in the midst of the fire, and they have no hurt; and the form of the fourth is like the Son of God."

Check your modern translations for this verse. The NIV records it as "a son of the gods." There can be no mistaking that this points to Antichrist and not the real Christ! The scriptures do attribute a "god" status to fallen angels. The word "gods" is found a total of 244 times in the scriptures. This is a product which has the number for the world (4) as its multiplier (4x61). These false "gods" are truly earthly and not heavenly.

Our Savior is also given the title of "Son of Man". This phrase is found 196 times in the AV. This number breaks down to 49 (7x7) x 4! The last place that this phrase is used is in Revelation 14 verse 14! Check your modern translations for this same pattern. Is this title found exactly this many times in any other translation? I do not believe that it exists outside the King James Version.

In John 12, the doubters ask Jesus a very simple question. (John 12:34) "….who is this Son of man?"

I know who it is. It is Jesus Christ. How do I know for sure? It is all in the numbers. The phrase "Jesus Christ" is found exactly 196 times in the King James. The exact amount of times that the "Son of Man" is found!

- Mike Hoggard (The King James Code)


And there you have it Pate. What I just shared with you from Mike Hoggard's book are facts which can be quickly verified if you have a Bible Search Software.

I recommend getting the King James Pure Bible Search software:


http://www.dewtronics.com/KingJamesPureBibleSearch/


And then you can look up these codes and verify them for yourself.

 

[pastorryanhayden]

This numerological emphasis a heresy every bit as dangerous as the latin mass.  Rather than focus on what the Bible plainly says, understood in context, it sends people searching for "deeper" truths in the Bible, and thus separates people from scripture's content all the while enforcing in their minds that they are truly Bible believers.  It's akin to the Pharisees arguing over how many angels could dance on the head of a needle.  It's like trying to understand the forrest by looking at tree bark under a microscope. 
By dwelling on these "deeper truths" these men are setting themselves up as "experts" and "scholars" who can pretty much teach whatever they want and people will swallow it because of their obvious "deeper knowledge."  They can use these tricks to manipulate and bring loyalty to themselves and their crowd. 
I'm a King James guy.  I've never preached a single message out of anything but the King James, and I don't own anything but a King James Bible.  (Besides my greek texts and some versions that came bundled with Bible software that I never use.)  But I focus on preaching the CONTENT, not the COVER.  Because it is the content that is inspired by God and profitable and that makes the Christian perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.  Not the cover.
Rather than add authority to the scripture, this kind of biblioltry (I've never used that word before, but that's what it is) takes authority away from scripture and puts it on an man. 

 

[christundivided]

This numerological emphasis a heresy every bit as dangerous as the latin mass.  Rather than focus on what the Bible plainly says, understood in context, it sends people searching for "deeper" truths in the Bible, and thus separates people from scripture's content all the while enforcing in their minds that they are truly Bible believers.  It's akin to the Pharisees arguing over how many angels could dance on the head of a needle.  It's like trying to understand the forrest by looking at tree bark under a microscope. 
By dwelling on these "deeper truths" these men are setting themselves up as "experts" and "scholars" who can pretty much teach whatever they want and people will swallow it because of their obvious "deeper knowledge."  They can use these tricks to manipulate and bring loyalty to themselves and their crowd. 
I'm a King James guy.  I've never preached a single message out of anything but the King James, and I don't own anything but a King James Bible.  (Besides my greek texts and some versions that came bundled with Bible software that I never use.)  But I focus on preaching the CONTENT, not the COVER.  Because it is the content that is inspired by God and profitable and that makes the Christian perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.  Not the cover.
Rather than add authority to the scripture, this kind of biblioltry (I've never used that word before, but that's what it is) takes authority away from scripture and puts it on an man.

Yes. This nothing more than re-branded "gnosticism".

 

[Timothy]

This numerological emphasis a heresy every bit as dangerous as the latin mass.  Rather than focus on what the Bible plainly says, understood in context, it sends people searching for "deeper" truths in the Bible, and thus separates people from scripture's content all the while enforcing in their minds that they are truly Bible believers.  It's akin to the Pharisees arguing over how many angels could dance on the head of a needle.  It's like trying to understand the forrest by looking at tree bark under a microscope. 
By dwelling on these "deeper truths" these men are setting themselves up as "experts" and "scholars" who can pretty much teach whatever they want and people will swallow it because of their obvious "deeper knowledge."  They can use these tricks to manipulate and bring loyalty to themselves and their crowd. 
I'm a King James guy.  I've never preached a single message out of anything but the King James, and I don't own anything but a King James Bible.  (Besides my greek texts and some versions that came bundled with Bible software that I never use.)  But I focus on preaching the CONTENT, not the COVER.  Because it is the content that is inspired by God and profitable and that makes the Christian perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.  Not the cover.
Rather than add authority to the scripture, this kind of biblioltry (I've never used that word before, but that's what it is) takes authority away from scripture and puts it on an man.

thank you.... i totally agree... and it;s what i;ve been saying all along about the king james only movement... they want to return to a former age in church history... and one i;m not unfamiliar with having once been a catholic...  when only a select few could read and understand scripture... and where therefore the only ones qualified.. or authorized .. to teach it.....

i love the king james Bible and there are a lot of people within the king james only camp i have a lot of respect for.... i don;t believe they would truly want to see the church to return to that kind of dark age ..... but i think they might not be aware that;s it;s exactly where their movement will take them......

I wonder who is doing more "harm" the King James folks preaching the gospel, or the liberal crowd teaching unified religion. Hmmmmmm

I believe the King James is still readable by most folks. Even my kids read and comprehend it. Even the modern versions you need a dictionary from time to time to study. We do have the freedom to study the Bible - unlike the dark days you mention.

 

[pastorryanhayden]

This numerological emphasis a heresy every bit as dangerous as the latin mass.  Rather than focus on what the Bible plainly says, understood in context, it sends people searching for "deeper" truths in the Bible, and thus separates people from scripture's content all the while enforcing in their minds that they are truly Bible believers.  It's akin to the Pharisees arguing over how many angels could dance on the head of a needle.  It's like trying to understand the forrest by looking at tree bark under a microscope. 
By dwelling on these "deeper truths" these men are setting themselves up as "experts" and "scholars" who can pretty much teach whatever they want and people will swallow it because of their obvious "deeper knowledge."  They can use these tricks to manipulate and bring loyalty to themselves and their crowd. 
I'm a King James guy.  I've never preached a single message out of anything but the King James, and I don't own anything but a King James Bible.  (Besides my greek texts and some versions that came bundled with Bible software that I never use.)  But I focus on preaching the CONTENT, not the COVER.  Because it is the content that is inspired by God and profitable and that makes the Christian perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.  Not the cover.
Rather than add authority to the scripture, this kind of biblioltry (I've never used that word before, but that's what it is) takes authority away from scripture and puts it on an man.

thank you.... i totally agree... and it;s what i;ve been saying all along about the king james only movement... they want to return to a former age in church history... and one i;m not unfamiliar with having once been a catholic...  when only a select few could read and understand scripture... and where therefore the only ones qualified.. or authorized .. to teach it.....

i love the king james Bible and there are a lot of people within the king james only camp i have a lot of respect for.... i don;t believe they would truly want to see the church to return to that kind of dark age ..... but i think they might not be aware that;s it;s exactly where their movement will take them......

I wonder who is doing more "harm" the King James folks preaching the gospel, or the liberal crowd teaching unified religion. Hmmmmmm

I believe the King James is still readable by most folks. Even my kids read and comprehend it. Even the modern versions you need a dictionary from time to time to study. We do have the freedom to study the Bible - unlike the dark days you mention.

It wasn't a dig against the KJV. Your kids aren't going to read it and come up with some numerical juju.  You couldn't give a KJV to a man who knew nothing of Christ and have him come away talking about a Bible code.  This is looking elsewhere than the plain and understandable meaning of scripture for our daily bread.  It's heretical, and it's dangerous.

 

[Biblebeliever]

thank you.... i totally agree... and it;s what i;ve been saying all along about the king james only movement... they want to return to a former age in church history... and one i;m not unfamiliar with having once been a catholic...  when only a select few could read and understand scripture... and where therefore the only ones qualified.. or authorized .. to teach it.....

i love the king james Bible and there are a lot of people within the king james only camp i have a lot of respect for.... i don;t believe they would truly want to see the church to return to that kind of dark age ..... but i think they might not be aware that;s it;s exactly where their movement will take them......

Aleshanee, with all due respect ma'am. The dark age is already here. You know why? Because of all the 230+ English translations out there which all contradict one another. There is a severe famine in the Land of hearing the words of the LORD (Amos 8:11).


When you hear pastors say things: "Well a better rendering would be," "Well the verse here should actually read like this,"  "This verse is not in the original Greek." And so on, what these pastors are doing is sowing doubt into your minds as to whether you can trust what God said. It is a "Yea, hath God said...?" mentality.

It was the Roman Catholic church that did not want the Holy Bible in the hands of the laity, why? Because they wanted to keep the laity down. They wanted to continue to have control over them. And what the Roman Catholic church did in the dark ages of that time, the new Protestant popes like James White and Doug Kutilek are doing to Christians today. They constantly critique the Bible and they themselves do not believe that any Bible in any language is the perfect, pure and inerrant word of God. And that is a fact ma'am.


Here is a video showing this to be the case. Now I am sure many of you aren't going to even take the time to watch it, but I am still going to share it just so that it is here.

Protestant Popes using Textual Criticism part 1.


Protestant Popes using Textual Criticism 1​

You see these Alexandrian scholars and pastors do not like the idea of the laity, the common people having a perfect Bible in their hands that they can judge them with. When you have a perfect Bible that is the Absolute Final Authority, then that puts everyone at the same level. It puts everyone on an equal ground, where there is no hierarchy.

 

[christundivided]

This numerological emphasis a heresy every bit as dangerous as the latin mass.  Rather than focus on what the Bible plainly says, understood in context, it sends people searching for "deeper" truths in the Bible, and thus separates people from scripture's content all the while enforcing in their minds that they are truly Bible believers.  It's akin to the Pharisees arguing over how many angels could dance on the head of a needle.  It's like trying to understand the forrest by looking at tree bark under a microscope. 
By dwelling on these "deeper truths" these men are setting themselves up as "experts" and "scholars" who can pretty much teach whatever they want and people will swallow it because of their obvious "deeper knowledge."  They can use these tricks to manipulate and bring loyalty to themselves and their crowd. 
I'm a King James guy.  I've never preached a single message out of anything but the King James, and I don't own anything but a King James Bible.  (Besides my greek texts and some versions that came bundled with Bible software that I never use.)  But I focus on preaching the CONTENT, not the COVER.  Because it is the content that is inspired by God and profitable and that makes the Christian perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.  Not the cover.
Rather than add authority to the scripture, this kind of biblioltry (I've never used that word before, but that's what it is) takes authority away from scripture and puts it on an man.

thank you.... i totally agree... and it;s what i;ve been saying all along about the king james only movement... they want to return to a former age in church history... and one i;m not unfamiliar with having once been a catholic...  when only a select few could read and understand scripture... and where therefore the only ones qualified.. or authorized .. to teach it.....

i love the king james Bible and there are a lot of people within the king james only camp i have a lot of respect for.... i don;t believe they would truly want to see the church to return to that kind of dark age ..... but i think they might not be aware that;s it;s exactly where their movement will take them......

I wonder who is doing more "harm" the King James folks preaching the gospel, or the liberal crowd teaching unified religion. Hmmmmmm

I believe the King James is still readable by most folks. Even my kids read and comprehend it. Even the modern versions you need a dictionary from time to time to study. We do have the freedom to study the Bible - unlike the dark days you mention.

Hold on Timothy... Don't run anywhere. Stay right here. James White wrote a few articles on archaic words in the KJV. He did a rather good job at pointing out just how difficult it is to understand KJV english. You might want to look them up before you start rambling off at the mouth.

I do have a question for you. Without using a dictionary or Google. Tell me what the word.

"concupiscence" means?

In fact, I dare say most of you here can't tell me the definition without looking it up. Nor can you remember ever hearing or reading it in a sentence anywhere outside of the KJV. Nor can you tell me where its found in the KJV.

 

[christundivided]

You see these Alexandrian scholars and pastors do not like the idea of the laity, the common people having a perfect Bible in their hands that they can judge them with. When you have a perfect Bible that is the Absolute Final Authority, then that puts everyone at the same level. It puts everyone on an equal ground, where there is no hierarchy.

Really?

You post a video on some "hidden" code in the KJV and you then claim everyone is on equal ground? Really?

 

[Biblebeliever]

cuckoo clock - sound effect

Also, check this out:

The phrase: "the word of the Lord" appears 245 (49 x 5) times in the Old Testament of the King James Bible.

The word "faith" appears 245 (49 x 5) times in the New Testament of the King James Bible.

You may be asking what is the correlation?

It is Romans 10:17:


17 So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God. - Romans 10:17 (KJV)


Isn't that neat?!


The phrase: "Lord of hosts" appears exactly 245 times in the Old Testament of the Authorized Version.


The phrase: "thus saith the Lord of hosts" appears 70 times in the King James Bible.


Guess what the 490th chapter (70 x 7) of the Bible is?

It is Psalm 12:


12 Help, Lord; for the godly man ceaseth; for the faithful fail from among the children of men.
2 They speak vanity every one with his neighbour: with flattering lips and with a double heart do they speak.
3 The Lord shall cut off all flattering lips, and the tongue that speaketh proud things:
4 Who have said, With our tongue will we prevail; our lips are our own: who is lord over us?
5 For the oppression of the poor, for the sighing of the needy, now will I arise, saith the Lord; I will set him in safety from him that puffeth at him.
6 The words of the Lord are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.
7 Thou shalt keep them, O Lord, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.
8 The wicked walk on every side, when the vilest men are exalted. - Psalm 12:1-8 (KJV)


The phrase: "thy word" appears 7 times in the New Testament.

The phrase: "holy Spirit" appears 7 times throughout the whole Bible.

"Thy word" is found 35 times in Psalm 119.


Both the words: "consecrate" and "consecrated" are found exactly 14 times in the Holy Bible!


Now this is really cool. Finally, consider the following:

The word "book" first shows up in Genesis 5:1 in the Old Testament. And the same word ("book") in the New Testament first shows up in Matthew 1:1.

Adam lived 930 years and then died.

Matthew 1 is the 930th chapter of the Bible!!!!


22 For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. - 1 Corinthians 15:22 (KJV)


You see aleshanee, God is a God of order. He is absolutely perfect. So His perfect and pure word would also have to be in order. And these systematic numerical codes and patterns which are found in the Authorized King James Version bear witness to the fact that the King James Bible is more than just a translation. It is the Book of the LORD! It is God's supernatural Book. It is the perfect, inerrant and infallible word of God.

 

[Biblebeliever]

Really?

You post a video on some "hidden" code in the KJV and you then claim everyone is on equal ground? Really?

Sir, anyone can look up these codes and find them in the text. Anyone can go and verify these Numerical codes and patterns. This is the opening and introduction to Mike Hoggard's book:

[size=12pt]The King James Code (Opening and Introduction)

By Mike Hoggard​

​

Section 1: About the King James Code.


What the King James Code is NOT.

"The King James Code does not have anything to do with equidistant letter sequences. Much debate centers around ELS because of its controversial, and sometimes rather subjective nature. Some feel that, even though, there may well be letter sequences in the Hebrew scriptures, there meanings and interpretations are most often obscure.

The King James Code is not a private, secret language that only the elect are going to be able to interpret. It does not necessarily require sophisticated computers and software in order to discover the codes, however, a computer search is much easier and less time consuming than a typical concordance search." - Mike Hoggard (About The King James Code)

 

[FSSL]

Sir, anyone can look up these codes and find them in the text. Anyone can go and verify these Numerical codes and patterns.

This is just total hogwash... even so, what SIGNIFICANCE does this numerology have for the believer?

 

[T-Bone]

Biblebeliever is at it again....could someone cue the Twilight Zone music!

 

[christundivided]

Really?

You post a video on some "hidden" code in the KJV and you then claim everyone is on equal ground? Really?

Sir, anyone can look up these codes and find them in the text. Anyone can go and verify these Numerical codes and patterns. This is the opening and introduction to Mike Hoggard's book:

[size=12pt]The King James Code (Opening and Introduction)

By Mike Hoggard​

​

Section 1: About the King James Code.


What the King James Code is NOT.

"The King James Code does not have anything to do with equidistant letter sequences. Much debate centers around ELS because of its controversial, and sometimes rather subjective nature. Some feel that, even though, there may well be letter sequences in the Hebrew scriptures, there meanings and interpretations are most often obscure.

The King James Code is not a private, secret language that only the elect are going to be able to interpret. It does not necessarily require sophisticated computers and software in order to discover the codes, however, a computer search is much easier and less time consuming than a typical concordance search." - Mike Hoggard (About The King James Code)

Humm.... was there anyone before this "nut".... claiming this? Maybe you should reconsider.

 

[pastorryanhayden]

All numerical codes are given by inspiration of God are profitable for ...
I couldn't think of anything to put there. 
God didn't give us a secret code.  He is not the author of confusion.  He gave us His Word.
It's not complicated.  Don't make it complicated.

 

[T-Bone]

You just got to love the "Christian mysticism" as proof of God preserving a particular translation of the Bible!  We have met the cultist and they are among us!

 

[Biblebeliever]

Folks, you can reject these facts all you want. But you cannot deny them. They have already been shown.

If you want to verify these Numerical codes and patterns, then I suggest you get the King James Pure Bible Search software:


http://www.dewtronics.com/KingJamesPureBibleSearch/


It is totally free to download.

Also, if you have the latest version of quickverse, then that should work as well. As long as your Bible search software does an accurate word for word count.

For instance, if you type in the word "church" then all the Scriptures which have the word "church" will show up.

And if you type in the word "churches" (plural) then only the Scriptures which have that particular word will show up in the results, and it will show you the total amount of times that each particular word occurs in the Scriptures.

 

[FSSL]

Sir, anyone can look up these codes and find them in the text. Anyone can go and verify these Numerical codes and patterns.

What SIGNIFICANCE does this numerology have for the believer?

Bump!