- Joined
- Jan 28, 2013
- Messages
- 8,299
- Reaction score
- 109
- Points
- 63
At HAC we were always taught that if you have a serious problem with a pastor or church you should just leave quietly. I have been attended IFB churches for 44 years. During that time I have left two churches because of issues.
I left the first church because the pastor should have never been a pastor. He was a nice guy. The problem was he was not good at teaching or preaching. He had a very backward personality and was much more at home being alone instead of being with people. The church was dying and the pastor could not see it.
I left the second church because the pastor started preaching doctrines to which I could not agree. Again, a nice guy for the most part, but in many ways was like a bull in a china closet. This church was being slowly destroyed.
Both times I stayed longer than I should have. Both times I spoke privately to the pastor to let him know I was leaving. Because I meant the pastor no harm and desired to leave quietly, I did not go into details. I handled my leaving in a very quiet fashion and did everything in my power not to stir the waters.
The first church continued to lose families. These families left quietly and began to attend other churches in the area. Finally, a couple of key men went to the pastor and convinced him that things were not working. The pastor resigned and assumed the role of a layman. Since this time the church has called a new pastor and is doing well and growing.
The second church had a major split (service walk out, police, etc). The pastor decided to try and prove a point and stay at the church. He hung on with a hand full of people until the church closed and the buildings had to be sold.
Here is my point of topic. When is it right to go to the pastor as an individual or group and confront him with issues. When is it right to ask a pastor to leave instead of watching the church lose families? Is it ever right to take a vote of confidence? I'm not talking about immoral or wrong behavior on the part of the pastor (thought obviously some idiots, I mean Hackers, would treat that the same way). Hacker Nation, what think ye?
I left the first church because the pastor should have never been a pastor. He was a nice guy. The problem was he was not good at teaching or preaching. He had a very backward personality and was much more at home being alone instead of being with people. The church was dying and the pastor could not see it.
I left the second church because the pastor started preaching doctrines to which I could not agree. Again, a nice guy for the most part, but in many ways was like a bull in a china closet. This church was being slowly destroyed.
Both times I stayed longer than I should have. Both times I spoke privately to the pastor to let him know I was leaving. Because I meant the pastor no harm and desired to leave quietly, I did not go into details. I handled my leaving in a very quiet fashion and did everything in my power not to stir the waters.
The first church continued to lose families. These families left quietly and began to attend other churches in the area. Finally, a couple of key men went to the pastor and convinced him that things were not working. The pastor resigned and assumed the role of a layman. Since this time the church has called a new pastor and is doing well and growing.
The second church had a major split (service walk out, police, etc). The pastor decided to try and prove a point and stay at the church. He hung on with a hand full of people until the church closed and the buildings had to be sold.
Here is my point of topic. When is it right to go to the pastor as an individual or group and confront him with issues. When is it right to ask a pastor to leave instead of watching the church lose families? Is it ever right to take a vote of confidence? I'm not talking about immoral or wrong behavior on the part of the pastor (thought obviously some idiots, I mean Hackers, would treat that the same way). Hacker Nation, what think ye?