16KJV11 said:
Ex-Fundy said:
I read through most of this thread and am not sure I saw where anyone mentions what strikes me as the most obvious error in this whole endeavor...that none of these boys possesses anything resembling real respectable training nor credentials! Would any among us go see a doctor who never trained in a reputable institution but just had some "on the job training" or years of experience at some half-baked clinic?
I know that it is out of fashion to discourage someone who wants to "start a church", but let's face it this is nothing more than a fool's errand. God doesn't need them as badly as they want to think He does.
I take it walking with Jesus isn't enough credential? Is Ken Schaap unable to walk with Jesus? I'm not opposed to formal education, but have you ever checked out the education status of the disciples, save Paul?
One of the biggest snope of all time
Educated apostles.
1. Matthew, as a tax collector, most likely spoke three languages. He also had accountant skills.
2. Luke was a physician.
3. John, a devout Jew, likely memorized the whole of the Torah. He was known of the high priest at the beginning trials of Jesus. As well, he authored the most difficult book of the Bible. ( which indicated he also spoke two languages).
Now when they saw the boldness of Peter and John, and perceived that they were unlearned and ignorant men, they marvelled; and they took knowledge of them, that they had been with Jesus.
This criticism was from the elites. Only that they weren't of their ilk. Uneducated meaning, they bought what Jesus was selling. Not just stupid.
4. Phillip said, "We have found Him of whom Moses and the prophets spoke. Well educated and well read.
5. Peter and Andrew, being brothers, were also devout Jews, not ignorant simpletons because of their occupation.
The others almost all were not uneducated or dumb.
Any author in the New Testament was fluent in Greek and and possibly spoke another language.