Church of Christ hatred for Baptists.

ALAYMAN said:
brianb said:
Which Church of Christ is this? Is this the infamous Boston Church of Christ and not the original Church of Christ from early 1800's?

Just some simple errors that they hold to (though not all CoC hold to all of these oddities/errors):

1) They are the restored church, and no other church is a true church
2) Must be baptized in order to wash away sins (be saved).
3) No instrumental music
4) A distorted view of grace, law, and obedience.
5) A flawed view of the work and person of the Holy Spirit

Then that would be a church from the Boston Church of Christ (international Churches of Christ). Not all of these churches are against musical instruments however but they are still cultic.
 
brianb said:
ALAYMAN said:
brianb said:
Which Church of Christ is this? Is this the infamous Boston Church of Christ and not the original Church of Christ from early 1800's?

Just some simple errors that they hold to (though not all CoC hold to all of these oddities/errors):

1) They are the restored church, and no other church is a true church
2) Must be baptized in order to wash away sins (be saved).
3) No instrumental music
4) A distorted view of grace, law, and obedience.
5) A flawed view of the work and person of the Holy Spirit

Then that would be a church from the Boston Church of Christ (international Churches of Christ). Not all of these churches are against musical instruments however but they are still cultic.

Actually, that list is  fairly representative of all COC's, not just the "international" splinter group.

You could go to most any of the original Church of Christ congregations and still find all 5 of these in play.  There's only a VERY small minority of Church of Christ congregations (in the double digits at best) that allow musical instruments, and they're shunned by the other COC's as liberal and compromising (sound familiar?).  For instance, you could go to Phil Robertson's church down in West Monroe, LA and they would adhere to all five points of this. 

The ICOC is a very small group, mainly in larger cities and urban areas. They adhere to all these, PLUS a very strict view of discipling.
 
Castor Muscular said:
From wikipedia:
...

I haven't argued for dualism, any secret knowledge (the gospel is anything but secret), nor do I think that the material universe is evil, so I don't get the connection.


Amazed said:
What part of the fellowship mentioned in my post compromised the gospel?

I'm not sure how you are defining fellowship so loosely to include correction (of the "waterdog").
 
ALAYMAN said:
Castor Muscular said:
From wikipedia:
...

I haven't argued for dualism...

Actually you have.

[quote author=ALAYMAN]...any secret knowledge (the gospel is anything but secret)...[/quote]

And that too.

[quote author=ALAYMAN]...nor do I think that the material universe is evil, so I don't get the connection.[/quote]

And even this.
 
rsc2a said:
ALAYMAN said:
Castor Muscular said:
From wikipedia:
...

I haven't argued for dualism...

Actually you have.

Innocuous does not mean evil.  Par for the course for your inability to have any intellectual integrity, which is why the rest of your assertions are a load of dung, unworthy of dignifying.
 
ALAYMAN said:
rsc2a said:
ALAYMAN said:
Castor Muscular said:
From wikipedia:
...

I haven't argued for dualism...

Actually you have.

Innocuous does not mean evil.  Par for the course for your inability to have any intellectual integrity, which is why the rest of your assertions are a load of dung, unworthy of dignifying.

Notice that wall you put between sacred and secular...there is a philosophy for that. It's called Gnosticism.
 
Obtuse! Please someone accuse someone of being obtuse! Then all will be right in the world.  8)
 
subllibrm said:
Obtuse! Please someone accuse someone of being obtuse! Then all will be right in the world.  8)

You're being obtuse.
 
Castor Muscular said:
subllibrm said:
Obtuse! Please someone accuse someone of being obtuse! Then all will be right in the world.  8)

You're being obtuse.

Whew. I feel so much better now. Thanks!  ;D
 
Just saw on Fox where a large C of C in Moore, OK was throwing open its doors to the community for food, water and shelter. Watching what happened there kind of puts all this hair splitting in perspective.


ChuckBob
 
ChuckBob said:
Just saw on Fox where a large C of C in Moore, OK was throwing open its doors to the community for food, water and shelter. Watching what happened there kind of puts all this hair splitting in perspective.


ChuckBob

Because doing charitable deeds makes doctrine obsolete every time, right?
 
rsc2a said:
Notice that wall you put between sacred and secular...there is a philosophy for that. It's called Gnosticism.


I notice it to the same extent, and give it the same credence that I do the boogey-man under my lil boys bed.
 
ChuckBob said:
Just saw on Fox where a large C of C in Moore, OK was throwing open its doors to the community for food, water and shelter. Watching what happened there kind of puts all this hair splitting in perspective.


ChuckBob

It's great, no wonderful that they are doing this , but so is the Red Cross  doesn't make either one a doctrinely sound church.One is a cult the other a non profit relief organization.
 
ChuckBob said:
Just saw on Fox where a large C of C in Moore, OK was throwing open its doors to the community for food, water and shelter. Watching what happened there kind of puts all this hair splitting in perspective.


ChuckBob

You don't believe Bob Gray's 'averaging' theory, do you?  :)
 
Web said:
ALAYMAN said:
Because doing charitable deeds cancels makes doctrine obsolete every time, right?

Could you rephrase that?  Not quite sure what you are saying.


Fixed.

The point being that doing good deeds doesn't make up for cultic and heretical doctrine, for CoC, Jack Schaap, or anyone else. 


 
ALAYMAN said:
Web said:
ALAYMAN said:
Because doing charitable deeds cancels makes doctrine obsolete every time, right?

Could you rephrase that?  Not quite sure what you are saying.


Fixed.

The point being that doing good deeds doesn't make up for cultic and heretical doctrine, for CoC, Jack Schaap, or anyone else.

Then you should really reconsider that whole denial of the universal Church heresy you ascribe to...
 
ALAYMAN said:
Web said:
ALAYMAN said:
Because doing charitable deeds cancels makes doctrine obsolete every time, right?

Could you rephrase that?  Not quite sure what you are saying.


Fixed.

The point being that doing good deeds doesn't make up for cultic and heretical doctrine, for CoC, Jack Schaap, or anyone else.


The point being that when the world is exploding in your face and your neighbor's children are dying as they lie burried beneath tons of rubble that the charges of cult and heresey bantered about assume the pissant status they so richly deserve.


ChuckBob
 
ChuckBob said:
The point being that when the world is exploding in your face and your neighbor's children are dying as they lie burried beneath tons of rubble that the charges of cult and heresey bantered about assume the pissant status they so richly deserve.


ChuckBob

In that context, I doubt anybody would place the imminence of the doctrinal issue of baptismal regeneration over the life and limb of victims.  Of course that has absolutely zero to do with the context of our conversation here about the CoC heresy(s) and their damnable nature.  Their propagation throughout America occurs on a regular basis where there are no tornados to provide any subterfuge or distraction.  And at the end of the day, when all things of significance and importance are weighed, far more carnage will result from ignoring the effects of such soul-daming doctrine.
 
Being nice, sincere, compassionate and neighborly does not take care of the sin problem. 

I grew up across the street from the CofC I attended and was close to my church family.  One of the elder's sons was my older brother's best friend.  They were together in a car the night my brother died in a wreck.  I still remember the elder calling me to ask the number to contact my parents who were vacationing in San Diego.  I remember the grief-stricken face of the elder's son when I saw him.  The elder was compassionate and caring, as were the shocked church family. 

But I eventually left that church after I was saved because it taught a false doctrine.  Sincere, nice teachers pointed to the chart (located in every Sunday School class) which said the way to heaven was to 1) Repent 2) Believe 3) Confess 4) Be Baptized.  They taught me that I needed to be baptized in the CofC baptistry where the water would be mystically changed into the blood of Christ and in those waters my sins would be washed away.  Those sweet, kind people were damning my soul to hell with their false teaching.  No matter how you dress it with good works, false doctrine is an abomination.
 
Back
Top