- Joined
- Feb 23, 2012
- Messages
- 7,797
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 0
ALAYMAN said:rsc2a said:I see no reason to discuss this further. Everyone is free to read the thread and see who is being truthful. I will leave this little gem:
I can understand Christ-denying religionists, and certainly see why pagans would attempt to block the free-flow of the gospel, but it thoroughly boggles my mind that Bible believing Christians would be those who attempt to place hindrances on the dissemination of the gospel, particularly in the name of furthering their own personal ease. Absolutely mind-numbing. - Alayman
This is EXACTLY what I just told you I said in my last post. "It boggles my mind that evangelical would attempt to place hindrances on the dissemination of the gospel" is absolutely identical to "I was protesting the evangelicals on here and in America who so readily would like to suppress the free flow of the gospel". The fact that you would dig that out and post it as evidence supporting whatever inane claim you're making slams the gavel on you and your inability to avoid ultimate and gargantuan obtuseness.
...as you protested the law itself. (You'll notice I did agree that you were also doing as you claimed above.)
[quote author=ALAYMAN]
rsc2a said:Yes. Do you know what double standard is?
I take it you don't understand the difference between a person engaging in their constitutional right (and God commanded imperative) and somebody proselytizing. I also take that to mean that you wouldn't mind if I came to your property and began posting flyers advertising, well, whatever the flip I wanted to advertize. 8)[/quote]
Yes, I would mind. Just like I would mind if you started doing it at my church.
See? No double standard.