- Joined
- Jan 27, 2012
- Messages
- 9,132
- Reaction score
- 1,145
- Points
- 113
Smellin Coffee said:Tarheel Baptist said:Smellin Coffee said:Tarheel Baptist said:Smellin Coffee said:Tarheel Baptist said:Personally, since the SCOTUS' ruling on marriage I will not sign a gubmit marriage license bu perform Biblical Marriage Covenant ceremonies. The government doesn't define marriage as I do, based on Scripture.
And you should not be forced to go against your beliefs in this matter.
Tarheel Baptist said:It is clear in the NT that the church should provide a safety net for her body. The government historically is filled with waste and corruption, not a single gubmit controlled success story to be found.....USSR, Nazi Germany, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela......
And how many of those countries are democratic in government? Or are they all dictatorships?
Tarheel Baptist said:An argument you, Smells and liberal idiocy have no answer for is that no one ever built a cardboard boat to escape capitalism for socialism.
Yep. We need to get rid of the government helping people. Let's rid the country of the FDA. No need for the government to put any restrictions on our food quality. Food manufacturers should be able to put what they want in their foods and not need any quality control. Kids get sick and die? So be it. Free market at its best. No "gubming" controlling our food supply. Water? No need to test that either. The "gubmint" should just let those poor people in Flint die due to water contamination. It isn't "gubmint" business what people drink. If they can't boil their own water, they are just lazy slobs anyway. Collecting them "gubmint" checks while sitting on their lazy keesters, too lazy to boil their own water for their own health.
And ambulance/fire services? No need for them either. Neighbors should be helping neighbors, so if your house is on fire, they can grab their garden hoses and spray down your house. The well being of citizenry should be with the citizens along and the "gubmint" should use those funds used to protect our citizens should go to develop weapons to bomb the crap out of the Middle East instead.
Nope. Government shouldn't exist for the benefit of its citizenry. It goes against our freedoms to be restricted like this and to have them suck away our hard-earned dollars to help homeless kids and the elderly. We don't owe them anything but to tell them to pull themselves up by their own bootstraps.
Thanks for illustrating my point.
Building that raft to take you to Cuba?
So yes or now. Should the government play any role in the development and maintenance of the health and safety of its citizenry?
Of course they do.
Fire, health and safety are legitimate roles of gubmit.
Now, why don't people ever flee capitalistic countries for communist, socialist countries?
So you are for government responsibility for the well being of its citizens. But I guess it is only on 'your' terms. And if anybody disagrees with you, he is automatically a socialist/communist.
How many of those "socialistic" countries which are being avoided are democratic (little "d") in their structure? Or are they programmed to keep the same personnel in the position of ultimate power for decades?
As I have stated before, your vacuous arguments in defense of your liberal positions are hardly convincing...to say the least. Read the liberal socialist democrat party platform.....it walks and quacks like a socialist political duck.
History is history....no amount of shucking, jiving and dodging can change it...unless one is an low information, no information democrat voter....."give me my obama-phone"!
And, I am not against helping the poor and downtrodden, in fact I actually DO IT, and not just talk about it on the Internet and in gubmit meetings!
Click your heels three times and say there's no place like a liberal socialist utopia. And there is no animal like the unicorn! :