The article was about this doctor surmising his 566 patients had roughly doubled their risk of a cardiac event. If this doubling of the risk of a cardiac event is extrapolated across the 200 million + vaccinated, I would expect at least tens of thousands of additional cardiac deaths. That's not the case.
The article talks about damage - not deaths like the stats you posted and are extrapolating.
So you believe lots of people are having their hearts damaged but it's not killing anyone?
The point's quite simple. If a substance that has been administered to hundreds of millions of people over the last year causes heart damage, you'd expect deaths by heart attack to go up, not down by over 10%.
thecovidblog.com
Overall Deaths by year:tmjbog: “Doctors drop dead just like regular people. Nothing to see here.”
Reap what you sow? Doctors dropping like flies in deaths described as "died unexpectedly" and "died suddenly" since mid-October - The COVID Blog®
You can literally search "died suddenly" and "died unexpectedly" in Bing, DuckDuckGo, etc. and find endless young doctors dropping dead.
Something appears to have caused a one-year increase in deaths of about half a million people. Then, for some reason, annual deaths returned to their previous level a year later.
Damage doesn't necessarily mean immediate death or even death in the short-term. Damage is damage. It could lead to death a few years down the road. Or it might not. It is clear from the article that the doctor observed damage.
Not so much observed damage as the tests showed markers indicating damage. What we don't know is did the people administering the tests employ the same methodology every time? Was 566 the entire population of people having this test done every 3-6 months, or was there a purpose in selecting a subgroup? Why were these tests being administered to this group every 3-6 months for the past 8 years? Was there chronic heart damage that was being monitored? You're Assuming this doctor didn't design the "study" to get the results he wanted. I wouldn't put too much into a single doctors claims in an observational study. I would have a difficult time believing that group of people consisting of hundreds of millions of people have had their hearts damaged and yet there is no significant increase in cardiac related deaths.
Given that not everyone is vaccinated yet and there really hasn't been much time since even half the people have been vaccinated, I would not expect to see a noticeable increase in cardiac-related deaths for some time.
If there's an uptick in heart damage, and it's apparent now, then statistically it stands to reason that some of that heart damage would be severe enough to be fatal, and also apparent now.
www.sovren.media
alexberenson.substack.com
<yawn>
New York declares a health-care state of emergency over a Covid variant that doesn’t exist in the state
Guess what’s actually causing the crisis? Hint: it rhymes with “vaccine schmandate.”
www.foxnews.com
That's true. I have heart damage from an accute case of pericarditis in 2008.
