- Joined
- Feb 4, 2012
- Messages
- 4,013
- Reaction score
- 10
- Points
- 38
RAIDER said:bgwilkinson said:The other big one was he defined a true church down to only FBCH and he even ranted in one sermon, "I have a church and you don't." Pure folly.
Because you don't explain the context in which something was said people can get the wrong opinion. I have also heard him say this comment more than once. It was preceded by preaching against "churches" that do not preach the gospel. Does not that make it an accurate comment?
Well he had turned the English word Church to mean his very narrow version of a called out assembly. We would call it IFBx to the extreme. Clearly he went too far as we had watched FBCH slide backwards during the late 80s, he tried everything to regain his previous influence. So he was going to out IFBx the IFBxers.
I remember thinking as he went on about it, what about all the called out assemblies of saved baptized people that are within just a few miles of FBCH. I'm thinking of CW Homes who left and took a congregation in North Hammond, I knew he was winning people to the LORD, but he was persona non grata at FBCH because he spoke out against Bro. Hyles heresy and improper conduct. He was a former deacon, a faithful one at that.
There were then several true called-out assemblies in the Hammond area and he was smearing them by calling them illegitimate churches, not true churches. He was wrong. They were and are true called-out assemblies.
He was trying to regain control of what he called his "preacher boys". (I strongly object to this term)
Instead of regaining lost ground they started fighting. I did not know about all the specifics of the matter.
It would have been so good if we had had facebook and forums back then. They make it much harder for pastors to peddle their bad doctrine without someone calling them out.
Newspapers are just too slow.