Surely Schaap Is Wrong, but Riplinger Is A Nut!

[quote author=christundivided]I'm not playing you're little game anymore. You know exactly what I said. [/quote]

Yeah....I quoted it. At least be honest with yourself....

[quote author=christundivided]You didn't include a reference to Presbyterians but mentioned them in your first response. Very telling. You know they don't all agree and have no universal governing power to controls such.[/quote]


The Constitution of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.); Part I: Book of Confessions

Page 7

::)
 
Can we all just go back to the OP for one moment and agree that Schaap was wrong and Riplinger is a nut?  After that carry on! 8) :D
 
T-Bone said:
Can we all just go back to the OP for one moment and agree that Schaap was wrong and Riplinger is a nut?  After that carry on! 8) :D
Click to expand...

Schaap was definitely wrong and Riplinger has never been right.... :)

Nut might be a underestimating her a little. :)
 
christundivided said:
rsc2a said:
The Constitution of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.); Part I: Book of Confessions

Page 7

::)
Click to expand...

Have you ever heard of John Calvin? Probably not.....Do you know what relationship Calvin had to the Presbyterian church? Obviously not. Do you know what John Calvin believed about the phrase "descended into hell" in the Apostles creed?....... You're losing it
Click to expand...

Did you forget your original point?

You didn't include a reference to Presbyterians but mentioned them in your first response. Very telling. - christundivided

So what was so "telling" about me not including them?
 
ivannette said:
male chauvinism is a term used to describe the belief that men are superior to women    it is often used interchangeably with sexism and is closely associated with misogyny and perceptions of women as inferior to men especially intellectually    the unqualified term chauvinism is far more likely to refer to a male chauvinism than female chauvinism in the context of chauvinism as sexism

male chauvinism has been defined as a blind allegiance and simple minded devotion to ones maleness that is mixed with open or disguised belligerence toward women    it is also usually associated with an unconscious magical ritual to ward off anxiety engendered by these same women





And what does this have to do with OP?

male chauvinism was apparent long before the feminist movement and studies indicate that it has been as long believed and practiced as racism and religious persecution
Click to expand...
 
Previous statement inbedded in her statement...what does m/c have to do with OP?
 
christundivided said:
rsc2a said:
[quote author=christundivided]If you're going to just "wing" it when dealing with the doctrine... You really should do a little more research before you assume something.
Click to expand...

I guess the Anglicans (and Episcopalians), Presbyterians, Methodists, Lutherans.... all got it wrong.  ::)
Click to expand...

Some do and some don't. I depends on how its translated. Get it? It wasn't written in English and its been lengthened over time.

Get it? I know you know very little about such things but seriously.... you shouldn't participate in grown up conversations.
[/quote]

Pictures!! He needs pictures!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top