C
Castor Muscular
Guest
Darkwing Duck said:Are you saying some people get saved differently than others?
We all get saved the same way. Jesus saves.
Darkwing Duck said:Are you saying some people get saved differently than others?
rsc2a said:Darkwing Duck said:[quote author=rsc2a]He didn't say knowledge about Jesus saves. He said Jesus saves.
Fine. Can you explain that?
What does that mean?
Binaca Chugger said:Seems this debate has taken on a Calvinist vs Free Will form.
John 6:28 Then they said to Him,
Castor Muscular said:...
Again, for another example, when the disciples asked Jesus, "Who, then, can be saved?" Jesus responded, "WITH MAN, this [being saved] is impossible. But with God, all things are possible." So, then, there is nothing man can say or do or know that will bring salvation. Salvation is entirely of God through Jesus. Jesus saves. Period.
ALAYMAN said:Does the One who does the saving have any say in how they will bring about that salvation?
Castor Muscular said:ALAYMAN said:Does the One who does the saving have any say in how they will bring about that salvation?
THEY do not bring about that salvation.
I know Romans 10:9, but the fact is that the expression one makes is evidence, not a causal act that brings about salvation. See:
1 Cor 12:3 Therefore I make known to you that no one speaking by the Spirit of God calls Jesus accursed, and no one can say that Jesus is Lord except by the Holy Spirit.
Lots of people will say "Jesus is Lord" and they won't be saved, so this verse is about more than what it means to say the words. You acknowledge -- FOR REAL -- that Jesus is Lord through the Holy Spirit, which has already taken residence in your heart. It isn't the act of acknowledging Jesus as Lord that brings about salvation.
At that point, God has already given you a new heart. He has saved you. See Deut.
ALAYMAN said:Nobody is disputing that Christ does the saving. What is being discussed is if Christ has appointed a means of how He will save, and numerous Scriptures point to the fact that faith is required for salvation.
Darkwing Duck said:For the 6000+ years that Native Americans lived in America without European contact, did they all die as unbelievers?
Can you find anything in the Bible to support your answer?
Darkwing Duck said:For the 6000+ years that Native Americans lived in America without European contact, did they all die as unbelievers?
Can you find anything in the Bible to support your answer?
christundivided said:Heb 4:2 For unto us was the gospel preached, as well as unto them: but the word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in them that heard it.
There was a certain man in Caesarea called Cornelius, a centurion of what was called the Italian Regiment, 2 a devout man and one who feared God with all his household, who gave alms generously to the people, and prayed to God always. 3 About the ninth hour of the day he saw clearly in a vision an angel of God coming in and saying to him,
Smellin Coffee said:Read Acts 10.
There was a certain man in Caesarea called Cornelius, a centurion of what was called the Italian Regiment, 2 a devout man and one who feared God with all his household, who gave alms generously to the people, and prayed to God always. 3 About the ninth hour of the day he saw clearly in a vision an angel of God coming in and saying to him,
Castor Muscular said:christundivided said:Heb 4:2 For unto us was the gospel preached, as well as unto them: but the word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in them that heard it.
This is a great illustration of Deuteronomy 28, 29, 30 and Romans, i.e., Faith comes by hearing and hearing [comes by] the utterance of God.
I say "utterance" because the Greek is not "logos" and it makes no sense for it to mean "the written or preached word of God". If the preached word of God gave faith, then Heb 4:2 would make no sense. If the preached word of God gave faith, then they would have had faith to mix with the preached word.
So the only logical interpretation would be, "Faith comes by hearing and hearing comes when God says so." God's enabling is required for faith. The change that is necessary for salvation comes only from God. "The Lord your God will circumcise your hearts and the hearts of your descendants, so that you may love him with all your heart and with all your soul, and live."
When the word is not mixed with faith, that is not because man failed to respond with faith. Man doesn't have it in him to have faith. God gives it to them, or doesn't give it to them, according to His will. The Jews did not gain faith from God's signs and wonders because "to this day the Lord has not given you a mind that understands or eyes that see or ears that hear."
Castor Muscular said:This is a great illustration of Deuteronomy 28, 29, 30 and Romans, i.e., Faith comes by hearing and hearing [comes by] the utterance of God.
I say "utterance" because the Greek is not "logos" and it makes no sense for it to mean "the written or preached word of God". If the preached word of God gave faith, then Heb 4:2 would make no sense. If the preached word of God gave faith, then they would have had faith to mix with the preached word.
So the only logical interpretation would be, "Faith comes by hearing and hearing comes when God says so."
ALAYMAN said:Castor Muscular said:This is a great illustration of Deuteronomy 28, 29, 30 and Romans, i.e., Faith comes by hearing and hearing [comes by] the utterance of God.
I say "utterance" because the Greek is not "logos" and it makes no sense for it to mean "the written or preached word of God". If the preached word of God gave faith, then Heb 4:2 would make no sense. If the preached word of God gave faith, then they would have had faith to mix with the preached word.
So the only logical interpretation would be, "Faith comes by hearing and hearing comes when God says so."
Simply put, you are foisting an interpretive scheme on the passage that is conceived by your theological bias. It's a novel interpretation, but one not supported by any single other translation or paraphrase...
rsc2a said:But who is doing the preaching? I (and Paul and I believe Castor) would argue that the Spirit is the one preaching to the heart of man.
ALAYMAN said:rsc2a said:But who is doing the preaching? I (and Paul and I believe Castor) would argue that the Spirit is the one preaching to the heart of man.
The progression in clear in this passage, and evident from others, that the agency of man is ordained of God to carry the gospel so that the word might be made real in the hearts of men, made effective via the Holy Spirit's enablement.
The Romans passage depicts Paul's usage of one of his favorite forms of argument, rhetoric. The point is obvious...
(1) How then shall they call on Him in whom they have not believed?
(2) And how shall they believe in Him of whom they have not heard?
(3) And how shall they hear without a preacher?
(4) And how shall they preach unless they are sent?
(1)
ALAYMAN said:Simply put, you are foisting an interpretive scheme on the passage that is conceived by your theological bias. It's a novel interpretation, but one not supported by any single other translation or paraphrase...