Post on DRHAC says Jack Schaap giving info to Feds for reduced sentence

I've been told by a pretty informed source that Decoster's donations to FBC or Schaap were largely used to pay the monthly payments on the auditorium.  Schaap was losing members by the hundreds, and their offerings went with them; Decoster's money helped to offset the difference.

When this auditorium was being built, I thought it was to be built---paid in full!!  What lies Schaap told.  At least Hyles knew how to keep debt from building during his pastorate.
 
tobytyler said:
I've been told by a pretty informed source that Decoster's donations to FBC or Schaap were largely used to pay the monthly payments on the auditorium.  Schaap was losing members by the hundreds, and their offerings went with them; Decoster's money helped to offset the difference.

When this auditorium was being built, I thought it was to be built---paid in full!!  What lies Schaap told.  At least Hyles knew how to keep debt from building during his pastorate.
Click to expand...

Sure he could have built it debt free..............But then he wouldn't have a memorial to his legacy that outdid all of his predecessors.  :o

Oh, wait - his legacy did outdo all of his predecessors.  And he didn't even need a building to do it.  8)
 
Binaca Chugger said:
tobytyler said:
I've been told by a pretty informed source that Decoster's donations to FBC or Schaap were largely used to pay the monthly payments on the auditorium.  Schaap was losing members by the hundreds, and their offerings went with them; Decoster's money helped to offset the difference.

When this auditorium was being built, I thought it was to be built---paid in full!!  What lies Schaap told.  At least Hyles knew how to keep debt from building during his pastorate.
Click to expand...

Sure he could have built it debt free..............But then he wouldn't have a memorial to his legacy that outdid all of his predecessors.  :o

Oh, wait - his legacy did outdo all of his predecessors.  And he didn't even need a building to do it.  8)
Click to expand...
He needed one building in Crete, IL and one in Cadillac, MI.

Anishinaabe

 
I find this very curious. What on Earth could Schaap know about that wouldn't further get him in trouble and also be juicy enough to shorten his sentence that much? Money problems, I'd think he'd be to blame, covering for pervs-I don't see that reducing his sentence. Murder, ok I can see that.  I hope he'll still need to be a registered sex offender for life or he'll be right back in the ministry once out I imagine.
 
prophet said:
Binaca Chugger said:
tobytyler said:
I've been told by a pretty informed source that Decoster's donations to FBC or Schaap were largely used to pay the monthly payments on the auditorium.  Schaap was losing members by the hundreds, and their offerings went with them; Decoster's money helped to offset the difference.

When this auditorium was being built, I thought it was to be built---paid in full!!  What lies Schaap told.  At least Hyles knew how to keep debt from building during his pastorate.
Click to expand...

Sure he could have built it debt free..............But then he wouldn't have a memorial to his legacy that outdid all of his predecessors.  :o

Oh, wait - his legacy did outdo all of his predecessors.  And he didn't even need a building to do it.  8)
Click to expand...
He needed one building in Crete, IL and one in Cadillac, MI.

Anishinaabe
Click to expand...

And a forest preserve where he got alone with..........
 
Honey Badger said:
I find this very curious. What on Earth could Schaap know about that wouldn't further get him in trouble and also be juicy enough to shorten his sentence that much? Money problems, I'd think he'd be to blame, covering for pervs-I don't see that reducing his sentence. Murder, ok I can see that.  I hope he'll still need to be a registered sex offender for life or he'll be right back in the ministry once out I imagine.
Click to expand...

Nothing.  The DRHAC group is full of ego, but not truth.  IF his sentenced was reduced, twould be from good behavior or other such thing.
 
Posted by Jerry Kaifetz on facebook on Profaned Pulpit.>>>>MPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING A REDUCTION OF JACK SCHAAP'S SENTENCE: I just got off the phone with the clerk at the Federal Courthouse in Hammond, Indiana. Case No. 12:2-CR-131 (Jack's Schaap) is N-O-T on Judge Rudy Lozano's docket for sentence review or modification. NO WAY could Schaap's sentence be altered in any way without coming before Judge Lozano, and no way could there have been any request for sentence reduction without the introduction of that request on the court docket. In the words of the Court Clerk with whom I spoke, "Anything under consideration by Judge Lozano would be on the docket." (12-9-13) Also, a search of the B.O.P. Inmate Locator does not show any change in Schaap's original release date in 2023. Please feel free to pass this along to the Social Media rumor mills.
 
For a bunch of brave witch hunters, they sure act like he's Michael or Jason.
Announcement:  He's not coming back, youre gonna hafta find a life, sometime.



Anishinaabe

 
GuyfawkesV49 said:
Posted by Jerry Kaifetz on facebook on Profaned Pulpit.>>>>MPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING A REDUCTION OF JACK SCHAAP'S SENTENCE: I just got off the phone with the clerk at the Federal Courthouse in Hammond, Indiana. Case No. 12:2-CR-131 (Jack's Schaap) is N-O-T on Judge Rudy Lozano's docket for sentence review or modification. NO WAY could Schaap's sentence be altered in any way without coming before Judge Lozano, and no way could there have been any request for sentence reduction without the introduction of that request on the court docket. In the words of the Court Clerk with whom I spoke, "Anything under consideration by Judge Lozano would be on the docket." (12-9-13) Also, a search of the B.O.P. Inmate Locator does not show any change in Schaap's original release date in 2023. Please feel free to pass this along to the Social Media rumor mills.
Click to expand...

Welcome Guyfawkes!

Still, don't you understand that the federal court system is not kept abreast with information like the folks at DRHAC?  The FBI doesn't need to consult with the courts, only with the DRHAC group!  ::)
 
Binaca Chugger said:
GuyfawkesV49 said:
Posted by Jerry Kaifetz on facebook on Profaned Pulpit.>>>>MPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING A REDUCTION OF JACK SCHAAP'S SENTENCE: I just got off the phone with the clerk at the Federal Courthouse in Hammond, Indiana. Case No. 12:2-CR-131 (Jack's Schaap) is N-O-T on Judge Rudy Lozano's docket for sentence review or modification. NO WAY could Schaap's sentence be altered in any way without coming before Judge Lozano, and no way could there have been any request for sentence reduction without the introduction of that request on the court docket. In the words of the Court Clerk with whom I spoke, "Anything under consideration by Judge Lozano would be on the docket." (12-9-13) Also, a search of the B.O.P. Inmate Locator does not show any change in Schaap's original release date in 2023. Please feel free to pass this along to the Social Media rumor mills.
Click to expand...

In sure make sense that they would be the first to know!

Welcome Guyfawkes!

Still, don't you understand that the federal court system is not kept abreast with information like the folks at DRHAC?  The FBI doesn't need to consult with the courts, only with the DRHAC group!  ::)
Click to expand...

It sure make sense that they would be the first to know!

Slow news day on DRHAC I assume?
 
Pastor who had sex with 16-year-old parishioner seeks reduced sentence.

http://posttrib.suntimes.com/news/lake/26342542-460/pastor-who-had-sex-with-16-year-old-parishioner-seeks-reduced-sentence.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
 
Wow.... That's all I can say.... Maybe this is why they all left the area quickly.
 
Just when you think the story can't get any weirder....
 
OMG.  Maybe little man is being mistreated.  Boo Hoo!  Keep him there.  He's not wanted anywhere around NWI. 
 
He is still blaming the girl? Sick.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top