Obama debt hole deeper than George W. Bush's in less than half the time.

[redgreen5]

Poor poor Redgreen

Not really.  I understand this material. You don't. 
Pretty much sums it up.

Only liberals have the mental capacity to understand "this material."  Must be nice.

That's because of the self-inflicted wounds that conservatives give themselves in the education department.  Your fault, not mine.

 

[christundivided]

Poor poor Redgreen

Not really.  I understand this material. You don't. 
Pretty much sums it up.

Only liberals have the mental capacity to understand "this material."  Must be nice.

That's because of the self-inflicted wounds that conservatives give themselves in the education department.  Your fault, not mine.

Why do you want to make fun of the education level of conservatives?

Let me point out something in your "graph" that is rather obvious but you're ignoring.

What "liberals" call the "Bush tax cuts" is no longer the "Bush tax cuts". In fact, Obama has voted for them and even signed their extension after he became President. For you then to take all the cost of the "tax cuts" and place it on the "Bush Watch" total.... is entirely unethical. The cost of them are no longer on "Bush".

Obama voted for them. Obama extended them. The Democratically controlled House ans Senate voted to extend them. This is their "debt".

So quit lying and using deceptive charts to shift the blame for the debt to "Bush".

 

[JrChurch]

That's because of the self-inflicted wounds that conservatives give themselves in the education department.  Your fault, not mine.

Just returned from a wonderful trip to see family and hang with some fighter pilots who are some of the sharpest people on this planet...and conservative beyond your comprehension. You really need to get out more.

 

[redgreen5]

[quote author=christundivided]Why do you want to make fun of the education level of conservatives?[/quote]

I usually don't have to. They wind up doing it for me. This comedy writes itself, ya know?

Let me point out something in your "graph" that is rather obvious but you're ignoring.

What "liberals" call the "Bush tax cuts" is no longer the "Bush tax cuts".

Um, yes they are.  They were offered by Bush, outlined by Bush, championed by Bush, and signed by Bush.
If you think otherwise, then why are GOP politicians running for re-election on making the Bush tax cuts permanent?
Why aren't they running on making the Obama tax cuts permanent?
LOL

Like I said: this stuff writes itself.  Just add one drooling conservotard, sit back, and watch the fun begin.

In fact, Obama has voted for them and even signed their extension after he became President.

Obama signed a temporary extension get agreement on an extension for unemployment benefits, etc. needed in the middle of the Bush-Greenspan recession.

So quit lying and using deceptive charts to shift the blame for the debt to "Bush".

No lies here.  And these are the Bush tax cuts, because they started with Bush and the legislation was signed by Bush.  An extension of existing legislation doesn't change any of that.
And of course - if they were the Obama tax cuts, then why isn't  FOX News giving credit to Obama for them?

LOL like shooting fish in a barrel. Big, stupid, slow moving retarded fish.

 

[redgreen5]

That's because of the self-inflicted wounds that conservatives give themselves in the education department.  Your fault, not mine.

Just returned from a wonderful trip to see family and hang with some fighter pilots who are some of the sharpest people on this planet...and conservative beyond your comprehension. You really need to get out more.

I get out far more than you ever will. 

Oh, and as for your friendsd?  Hint: being a fighter pilot has zero qualifications in politics, economics, world history, etc. 
Congratulations on a non-sequitir (look it up).

 

[qwerty]

That's because of the self-inflicted wounds that conservatives give themselves in the education department.  Your fault, not mine.

Just returned from a wonderful trip to see family and hang with some fighter pilots who are some of the sharpest people on this planet...and conservative beyond your comprehension. You really need to get out more.

I get out far more than you ever will. 

Oh, and as for your friendsd?  Hint: being a fighter pilot has zero qualifications in politics, economics, world history, etc. 
Congratulations on a non-sequitir (look it up).

Unlike you, where being a jackass makes you more than qualified for politics, economics, world history, etc.

 

[redgreen5]

[quote author=qwerty]Unlike you, where being a jackass makes you more than qualified for politics, economics, world history, etc.
[/quote]

I'm not a jackass. I'm just acting as a mirror, showing all you wingbatters what your behavior looks like coming back at you.

Besides, it's not like I can't do both at the same time: run circles around you clowns while also slicing and dicing you.

 

[T-Bone]

Redgreen a legend in his own pea brained lying liberal mind 8)

 

[redgreen5]

Redgreen a legend in his own pea brained lying liberal mind 8)

1. No need to be a legend around here. It's not like you organ donors are challenging or anything.
2. No lies from me. Just a lot of facts that make you choke like a chicken bone.

 

[T-Bone]

LOL...what color is the sky in you delusional world?

 

[JrChurch]

I get out far more than you ever will. 

Oh, and as for your friendsd?  Hint: being a fighter pilot has zero qualifications in politics, economics, world history, etc. 
Congratulations on a non-sequitir (look it up).

The point about the family member who is a fighter pilot, along with his friends, is that they are strongly conservative. You seem to be mistaken in your insistence that all conservatives are knuckle-draggers.  You'd be surprised how compassionate, intelligent and accomplished conservatives can be.  I have no problem stating that some liberals are well-educated, too. 

Son, you really need to step back and evaluate yourself.  As full and eclectic as my life has been, that has not brought satisfaction. Our families have been blessed beyond measure with professional accomplishments, yet each has a personal relationship with an almighty God that gives their life real purpose. Their education, status, wealth and health are temporal and they acknowledge that their lives will pass as a vapor.  As will your life and mine. 

 

[redgreen5]

[quote author=JrChurch]The point about the family member who is a fighter pilot, along with his friends, is that they are strongly conservative. You seem to be mistaken in your insistence that all conservatives are knuckle-draggers.  [/quote]

Actually I said the opposite. Your inability to read my posts is your problem, not mine.
I just haven't met any conservatives around here who weren't the knuckle-dragging kind.

Son, you really need to step back and evaluate yourself.

I already have.  That's why I have confidence in my positions.

 

[Top]

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57400369-503544/national-debt-has-increased-more-under-obama-than-under-bush/


$10 bucks says that redgreenblackwhite will claim that fox news influenced CBS to report this.

 

[Top]

http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/

 

[redgreen5]

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57400369-503544/national-debt-has-increased-more-under-obama-than-under-bush/


$10 bucks says that redgreenblackwhite will claim that fox news influenced CBS to report this.

Already discussed the flaw in this kind of accounting in my first post on this thread.  It doesn't matter how many news outlets make the same error of civics and math; it's still an error.

This particular CBS writer cannot even get the figures for the Bush administration's contribution to the debt correct.

Bush
10/1/2001   $5,806,151,389,190.21
10/1/2009            $11,920,519,164,319.40

Growth in debt $6,114,367,775,129.19