Mr. Obama Threatens the Public School System...

[FSSL]

 

[Bruh]

Whats Obama doing this Weekend?
A) Promoting Islam
B) Golfing
C) Destroying Jobs
D) Peeing in Girls Bathrooms
E) All of the above

This surely raised the intelligence level of the conversation

How intelligent is a president that is arguing for men to go to the bathroom with little girls? Aaaaand then people on here defending him and his strong conviction about men using the bathroom with little girls.

Just sayn

 

[16KJV11]

Mr. Obama is truly the new king of Sodom.

 

[16KJV11]

This truly is a larger battle than on the surface.
We're not fighting against Obama and the liberals.
Sodomy, transgenderism, call it what you want, has never been right.
God has never approved of it, it is hideous and an abomination.
Yet its blatant existence is but a symptom of a deeper problem of rebellion against God in our country and is a tool in the hands of Satan to try to destroy God and His servants.
Yet he ultimately will not succeed.
But the battle is the Lord's and we must fight with spiritual weapons, donning the whole armor of God.
2 Corinthians 10:4 (KJV)
4  (For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds

Ephesians 6:10-18 (KJV)
10  Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might.
11  Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.
12  For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
13  Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.
14  Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness;
15  And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace;
16  Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked.
17  And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God:
18  Praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints;

 

[LongGone]

How intelligent is a president that is arguing for men to go to the bathroom with little girls? Aaaaand then people on here defending him and his strong conviction about men using the bathroom with little girls.

Just sayn

[/quote]

Isn't this a conversation about the President threatening schools with funding if students aren't able to use the restroom of the gender that they choose? People in schools are all the same age. Men don't go to school with little girls.

 

[16KJV11]

How intelligent is a president that is arguing for men to go to the bathroom with little girls? Aaaaand then people on here defending him and his strong conviction about men using the bathroom with little girls.

Just sayn

Isn't this a conversation about the President threatening schools with funding if students aren't able to use the restroom of the gender that they choose? People in schools are all the same age. Men don't go to school with little girls.
[/quote]
As if that makes much difference. Sexual activity is rampant among school age kids.

 

[LongGone]

As if that makes much difference. Sexual activity is rampant among school age kids.

Yes it does make a lot of difference. Using proper context is important whether you are using scripture or having a conversation. Since sexual activity is rampant among school age kids how does the transgenders using their identified restrooms have any impact on that? Even if it wasn't rampant I don't think that seeing a transgender in the bathroom is going to cause anyone to want to have sex.

 

[16KJV11]

As if that makes much difference. Sexual activity is rampant among school age kids.

Yes it does make a lot of difference. Using proper context is important whether you are using scripture or having a conversation. Since sexual activity is rampant among school age kids how does the transgenders using their identified restrooms have any impact on that? Even if it wasn't rampant I don't think that seeing a transgender in the bathroom is going to cause anyone to want to have sex.

And what law will keep curious kids who aren't necessarily transgenders out of the opposite sex bathrooms?
Hmmm, I feel like I'm identifying as a female today...
Absolute confusion, wickedness and poppycock.
If transgenderism is such an issue, allow schools to have bathrooms strictly for them, don't infringe upon the privacy of 99% of the other students.

 

[LongGone]

And what law will keep curious kids who aren't necessarily transgenders out of the opposite sex bathrooms?
Hmmm, I feel like I'm identifying as a female today...
Absolute confusion, wickedness and poppycock.
If transgenderism is such an issue, allow schools to have bathrooms strictly for them, don't infringe upon the privacy of 99% of the other students.

So now you are proposing a solution which I think is worthy of consideration. That is a far cry from saying the President wants grown men peeing with little girls or that somehow students are going to start having more sex because transgenders are able to use their identified restrooms. I am not sure that it will ever be the issue you think it will be. My point is that with all the evils and problems in the world where people are peeing is sure not a major issue.

 

[Smellin Coffee]

No one has to portray you...you do that yourself.

Good. I hope that portrayal is being associated with the "sinners" as considered by the Religious Right. I hope I'm found being associated with gays, transgendered folks, immigrants, unborn, addicts, prostitutes and racial minorities, death-row inmates, and collateral damage victims of war, extending mercy to each of them and being a voice on a Religious Right forum in their stead. If political liberals should be thrown in that list, include that too.

The fff might be guilty of many things, but falling for the vacuous, void of common sense and understanding liberal drivel isn't one of its collective faults.
You defend, using 'your hermeneutic', something the Bible clearly calls perversion, not 'merely' sin...i.e. Sodomy. The OT and the NT clearly condemn it.

The same reference book that contains the "abomination" of eating shellfish and bacon, mandates to keep from mixing fabrics and commands men to have sex with their sister-in-laws to carry on their family name. And the Bible also clearly states Sodom was destroyed because of their behaviors that mimic today's Republican agenda, and never does it state it was for consensual, homosexual sex. Not once.

And to intimate that you would have no problem with your daughter or granddaughter sharing a shower room with a man self identifying as a woman is ludicrous. IF that were true, there is something wrong with you.

I never said that and you know it. My family knows if there is ever a feeling of being uncomfortable, LEAVE IMMEDIATELY and report it. I don't care if it was clearly heterosexual biker chicks or female tattoo artists that have all right to be in the same facility.

You offer liberal talking points and reference often obscure web sites to substantiate liberal positions. And by doing such, you illustrate the lack of any substance, common sense or reasoning behind said ludicrous policies.

Since you keep referencing Young Conservatives and Fox News as sources which are clearly biased in their positions, how is what I am doing any different than your usual tactics? And 'obscure'? If I used mainstream media (NY Times, CNN, etc.), I would get accused of using 'liberal media' sites that engage solely to promote liberalism. So to use sites that show actual testing materials, it is unacceptable because it isn't mainstream. Nice con game you have going here. Heads, you win, tails, I lose.

Instead of crying about 'obscure sites', post data that contradicts the data posted on those sites. Let people see the other side and decide for themselves.

Again, many Christians put their money where liberals put their mouths.

And many liberals do the same with Christian rhetoric. And there are many liberal Christians who love the marginalized alongside of conservative Christians. True love is demonstrated without political division.

Liberalism offers symbolism and platitudes and is void of any substance!

You're welcome.

Sometimes yes, sometimes no. Same with Conservatism. Sometimes yes, sometimes no. There are fringes to both groups and both groups seek to control the American public and their ideal.

Me? My position is that of a Libertarian view (as is gay marriage), not solely a liberal view. You know that as I have said it several times...

 

[prophet]

IMO, perversion being accepted in the so called mainstream has lead to the ultimate persecution of Christians....is the judgement of God already at work.

I fear for my children and grandchildren in this untoward generation that calls good evil and evil good.

Especially if they stay in the SBC!!



earnestly contend

 

[prophet]

How intelligent is a president that is arguing for men to go to the bathroom with little girls? Aaaaand then people on here defending him and his strong conviction about men using the bathroom with little girls.

Just sayn

Isn't this a conversation about the President threatening schools with funding if students aren't able to use the restroom of the gender that they choose? People in schools are all the same age. Men don't go to school with little girls.
[/quote]
Hmmm, no staff of any local h.s. anywhere have ever molested a student before.
No staff ever use the bathroom.
No staff ever shower in the locker room.

Yup, all clear in the ostrich hole!

earnestly contend

 

[prophet]

No one has to portray you...you do that yourself.

Good. I hope that portrayal is being associated with the "sinners" as considered by the Religious Right. I hope I'm found being associated with gays, transgendered folks, immigrants, unborn, addicts, prostitutes and racial minorities, death-row inmates, and collateral damage victims of war, extending mercy to each of them and being a voice on a Religious Right forum in their stead. If political liberals should be thrown in that list, include that too.

The fff might be guilty of many things, but falling for the vacuous, void of common sense and understanding liberal drivel isn't one of its collective faults.
You defend, using 'your hermeneutic', something the Bible clearly calls perversion, not 'merely' sin...i.e. Sodomy. The OT and the NT clearly condemn it.

The same reference book that contains the "abomination" of eating shellfish and bacon, mandates to keep from mixing fabrics and commands men to have sex with their sister-in-laws to carry on their family name. And the Bible also clearly states Sodom was destroyed because of their behaviors that mimic today's Republican agenda, and never does it state it was for consensual, homosexual sex. Not once.

And to intimate that you would have no problem with your daughter or granddaughter sharing a shower room with a man self identifying as a woman is ludicrous. IF that were true, there is something wrong with you.

I never said that and you know it. My family knows if there is ever a feeling of being uncomfortable, LEAVE IMMEDIATELY and report it. I don't care if it was clearly heterosexual biker chicks or female tattoo artists that have all right to be in the same facility.

You offer liberal talking points and reference often obscure web sites to substantiate liberal positions. And by doing such, you illustrate the lack of any substance, common sense or reasoning behind said ludicrous policies.

Since you keep referencing Young Conservatives and Fox News as sources which are clearly biased in their positions, how is what I am doing any different than your usual tactics? And 'obscure'? If I used mainstream media (NY Times, CNN, etc.), I would get accused of using 'liberal media' sites that engage solely to promote liberalism. So to use sites that show actual testing materials, it is unacceptable because it isn't mainstream. Nice con game you have going here. Heads, you win, tails, I lose.

Instead of crying about 'obscure sites', post data that contradicts the data posted on those sites. Let people see the other side and decide for themselves.

Again, many Christians put their money where liberals put their mouths.

And many liberals do the same with Christian rhetoric. And there are many liberal Christians who love the marginalized alongside of conservative Christians. True love is demonstrated without political division.

Liberalism offers symbolism and platitudes and is void of any substance!

You're welcome.

Sometimes yes, sometimes no. Same with Conservatism. Sometimes yes, sometimes no. There are fringes to both groups and both groups seek to control the American public and their ideal.

Me? My position is that of a Libertarian view (as is gay marriage), not solely a liberal view. You know that as I have said it several times...

If my family would lose its inheritance, because my brother died sonless, lets say...in Iraq.
And it was our tradition that the next brother in line take her in and try to give a son to his name....
It wouldnt be a problem.

Just saying.

earnestly contend

 

[Tarheel Baptist]

IMO, perversion being accepted in the so called mainstream has lead to the ultimate persecution of Christians....is the judgement of God already at work.

I fear for my children and grandchildren in this untoward generation that calls good evil and evil good.

Especially if they stay in the SBC!!



earnestly contend

I should move their membership to the kitchen table...the dining room table has 8 chairs so it's much too big of a building.

 

[prophet]

IMO, perversion being accepted in the so called mainstream has lead to the ultimate persecution of Christians....is the judgement of God already at work.

I fear for my children and grandchildren in this untoward generation that calls good evil and evil good.

Especially if they stay in the SBC!!



earnestly contend

I should move their membership to the kitchen table...the dining room table has 8 chairs so it's much too big of a building.

At least no one has a say so over the bathrooms in my house.

earnestly contend

 

[Tarheel Baptist]

Meanwhile, in the Democrat Baffroom...

 

[LongGone]

How intelligent is a president that is arguing for men to go to the bathroom with little girls? Aaaaand then people on here defending him and his strong conviction about men using the bathroom with little girls.

Just sayn

Isn't this a conversation about the President threatening schools with funding if students aren't able to use the restroom of the gender that they choose? People in schools are all the same age. Men don't go to school with little girls.

Hmmm, no staff of any local h.s. anywhere have ever molested a student before.
No staff ever use the bathroom.
No staff ever shower in the locker room.

Yup, all clear in the ostrich hole!

earnestly contend
[/quote]

Staff generally have their own restrooms. If you have staff molesting a student there are plenty of laws that cover that. It is well documented that you don't need to be in the bathroom or shower for a staff person to molest a student. Even from the ostrich hole I can see this argument as silly and a non-starter.

 

[prophet]

How intelligent is a president that is arguing for men to go to the bathroom with little girls? Aaaaand then people on here defending him and his strong conviction about men using the bathroom with little girls.

Just sayn

Isn't this a conversation about the President threatening schools with funding if students aren't able to use the restroom of the gender that they choose? People in schools are all the same age. Men don't go to school with little girls.

Hmmm, no staff of any local h.s. anywhere have ever molested a student before.
No staff ever use the bathroom.
No staff ever shower in the locker room.

Yup, all clear in the ostrich hole!

earnestly contend

Staff generally have their own restrooms. If you have staff molesting a student there are plenty of laws that cover that. It is well documented that you don't need to be in the bathroom or shower for a staff person to molest a student. Even from the ostrich hole I can see this argument as silly and a non-starter.
[/quote]
I cant show you the big picture.

But I can call you at every single little point.

Bottom line, sexually active kids, and young adults, including staff who got their job for the sole purpose of having access to kids, are now going to be able to not only have an excuse for going into the wrong restroom, but a legal leg to stand on to sue anyone who gets offended by it.

By definition, if a highschool boy went into the girls restroom, a week ago, and exposed himself, he'd be a sexoffender.

Now, there are no grounds to pursue.

You really are defending a completely moronic p.o.v., and for certainly no God-fearing reason.

Enjoy the sand, the lions are lining up behind you.

earnestly contend

 

[prophet]

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/sexual-predator-jailed-after-claiming-to-be-transgender-in-order-to-assault




earnestly contend

 

[prophet]

http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/Man-Dressed-as-Woman-Arrested-for-Spying-Into-Mall-Bathroom-Stall-Police-Say-351232041.html

earnestly contend