I understand that you're avoiding the question and have a lot to learn about the Israeli form of 'democracy.' The allusion to your
sister's epiphany that there can only be a one-state solution belies your stated impartiality concerning the Temple Mount and who has the valid claims thereof.
You're also losing the argument about America's one-sided friendship with Israel and America's need for Israel in the middle east, as others with real knowledge about the situation are showing. I mean, it sounds like a good, secular and impartial pro-America platform, but it's all just smoke and mirrors. You've let your real feelings show,
that to be on the side of Israel is to be on the side of God.
BR and biscuit aren't afraid to admit it. Why are you? Is it because you are unable to argue from the Scriptures?
Reverting to name-calling suggests that you're defensive and therefore find my opinion to be valid.--Spock
Live long and prosper.--also Spock.