Is this not the natural outgrowth of liberal "Christianity"

[rsc2a]

inaccurate ≠ biased <=> accurate ≠ unbiased

And? You asked for a definition of theological liberalism.  Theopedia defines theological liberalism - quite accurately, from what I saw.

Do you object to the content of their definition or not, and if so, on what grounds?

Because of its bias....I've already made that clear...

Would you object to this as a functional definition of fundamentalist Christianity:

Fundamentalist thought in its most traditional incarnations emphasized the authority of Scripture, the wickedness of man, the infinite value of the human soul, the sacrifice of Jesus, and the importance of holy living. It has often been bigoted, divisive, and uncharitable.

Fundamentalism birthed other movements with varying emphases. Among these movements have been the Prosperity Gospel, the Christian patriarchy movement, Landmarkism, dispensational theology, and Westboro Baptist Church. One product of these movements is the heretical KJVo-ism which claims that the King James Bible is equal to Jesus and that it is our basis for salvation.

 

[Izdaari]

In this case, I think the Wikipedia article on Liberal Christianity is good:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_Christianity

But the Theopedia article doesn't seem that bad either:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_Christianity

What I really objected to was the pejorative mischaracterizations from some posters, making it out to be just heresy and of no value. I like to drive in the traffic lanes, whether left or right, and not fall into either ditch.

 

[Izdaari]

Would you object to this as a functional definition of fundamentalist Christianity:

Fundamentalist thought in its most traditional incarnations emphasized the authority of Scripture, the wickedness of man, the infinite value of the human soul, the sacrifice of Jesus, and the importance of holy living. It has often been bigoted, divisive, and uncharitable.

Fundamentalism birthed other movements with varying emphases. Among these movements have been the Prosperity Gospel, the Christian patriarchy movement, Landmarkism, dispensational theology, and Westboro Baptist Church. One product of these movements is the heretical KJVo-ism which claims that the King James Bible is equal to Jesus and that it is our basis for salvation.

I think that's very biased, obviously written by an opponent of fundamentalism, but it seems to have the facts right.

 

[Ransom]

Because of its bias....I've already made that clear...

So you can't state your objections to the content of the definition, but you don't like the definer. OK, irrational objection noted. Thanks.

 

[rsc2a]

Because of its bias....I've already made that clear...

So you can't state your objections to the content of the definition, but you don't like the definer. OK, irrational objection noted. Thanks.

Have you stopped beating your wife?  :

 

[Ransom]

Have you stopped beating your wife?

Not in any sense a relevant rebuttal to my question.

If you just want to dismiss Theopedia's definition of liberalism because you don't like them, just admit the ad hominem and move on.

 

[rsc2a]

Have you stopped beating your wife?

Not in any sense a relevant rebuttal to my question.

If you just want to dismiss Theopedia's definition of liberalism because you don't like them, just admit the ad hominem and move on.

So it would be accurate to say that you haven't stopped beating your wife....

 

[BandGuy]

Have you stopped beating your wife?

Not in any sense a relevant rebuttal to my question.

If you just want to dismiss Theopedia's definition of liberalism because you don't like them, just admit the ad hominem and move on.

So it would be accurate to say that you haven't stopped beating your wife....

No.  It would be stupid and irrelevant like most of your responses on this thread have been.