Timothy said:brianb said:Timothy said:Izdaari said:Yep, the morbidly obese woman in the bikini is not porn. Porn is intended to arouse lust. That pic is intended to cause you to lose your lunch. :
I wouldn't call that particular picture 'porn', but I believe it should be noted that some men do find big girls very attractive. The web is full of porn sites that cater to this demographic. I personally find big girls very attractive and pictures like that can actually cause me to lust ....
Good point. It's not very common but everybody has different tastes some are even perverted. Porn also must be deemed to be "obscene" to be considered porn. It must be arousing to one person but obscene to another person. This is how American law defines porn any ways.
I always believed pornography to be an image, book, or video illustrating erotic behavior and designed to generate sexual excitement. A picture of a woman in a bikini or even pictures of nude people are technically not defined as pornography.
Technically speaking yes but a picture of a woman in a bikini can either legally or illegally be used as a promo or teaser for porn particularly beach porn that often occurs during spring break when there are no families around. This is not just theoretical - it is reality. I've seen it and it's not something I want to see again.
Now if someone were to post a picture of Jessica Alba in a bikini - I wonder what the responses would be. A guy doesn't even have to think or use his imagination to be aroused by that - and it's perfectly natural - we are not wired to just be aroused by the beauty of our wives or there wouldn't be adultery - David would not have been with BathsI taught in the Bible to be wise in these matters. David was a man after God's own heart - normally he wouldn't be thinking about being with another man's wife. Also Bathsheba may have also been a victim because of David's authority - she probably couldn't say no. Some think it was because she was naked - we don't know if that \was the reason David lusted - maybe David just saw that she was beautiful. She probably shouldn't hav e been outside at all at that time clothed or unclothed - however being unclothed would have made it harder to resist. It is also indecent to be naked where one can easily be seen - does it really matter whether the naked offender is a man or woman, attractive or unattractive? Generally people don't think an old person is sexy but they still don't want to see them naked or even in a bikini - yet many frown on the thought of an old person in that state of undress or partially covered even though are not hurting any one in any way. But a young reasonably attractive woman in a bikini and in some places fully nude is tolerated and a sexy woman celebrated even though most men secretly (men are often suppressed by society's expectations of them) or not are being aroused by the sight of her. It isn't just men that are repulsed by an old woman in a bikini - it's the women as well - that's why it's not ok for them but it is ok for someone who is young because women care more about how something looks than men do like when they go to buy a car - do men care about color as much as women do? That's a more minor thing to them. Not all women think this way - I'm just saying that it is typical. Men generally care much more about what the car can do. And men do care about what a woman looks like but if they marry one they care more about what she will do for him. Looks are not everything to men - only shallow men would care too much about looks.
- If no then why not. We can post a warning with it or just post a link with a warning.
