Geocentrism: What's It Hurt?

AverageJoe said:
I seriously doubt you're intelligent enough to think like this. And your ASSumption I didn't know it is stupidity on your part. Of course, we've come to expect such stupidity from you.
Click to expand...
Right. Because you're so well-versed in cosmology. Like I said before, you hide your talents well.
 
Last edited:
Ekklesian said:
Right. Because you're so well-versed in cosmology. Like I said before, you hide your talents well.
Click to expand...
I'm not fool enough to put all I know on public display. There's enough information on everyone floating around for the government to "cherry-pick" from. You go ahead and play the fool for us, okay? You show your idiocy well. Thanks.
 
I was wondering if the crackpot, much-married "Dr. Dino" Kent Hovind believes in geocentrism. According to this article, he does not:


Kent Hovind Spreads Lie About Dominion To Support His Pardon Claim - Your Tax Matters Partner

Kent continues asking President Trump to grant a pardon before he leaves - "He may not be leaving". That leads right into a discussion of Dominion Voting "changing the way people vote". For what it is worth the Dominion logo Hovind shows is not what is on Dominion's site. Hovind shows a logo of...
yourtaxmatterspartner.com yourtaxmatterspartner.com


"Hovind rarely sees a conspiracy theory he doesn’t like just a little although it is worth noting that he did not embrace geocentrism and flat earth much to the chagrin of some of his supporters."


Looks like the Shirtless One is pretty much in a league of his own with his geocentrism crusade.
 
illinoisguy said:
I was wondering if the crackpot, much-married "Dr. Dino" Kent Hovind believes in geocentrism. According to this article, he does not:


Kent Hovind Spreads Lie About Dominion To Support His Pardon Claim - Your Tax Matters Partner

Kent continues asking President Trump to grant a pardon before he leaves - "He may not be leaving". That leads right into a discussion of Dominion Voting "changing the way people vote". For what it is worth the Dominion logo Hovind shows is not what is on Dominion's site. Hovind shows a logo of...
yourtaxmatterspartner.com yourtaxmatterspartner.com


"Hovind rarely sees a conspiracy theory he doesn’t like just a little although it is worth noting that he did not embrace geocentrism and flat earth much to the chagrin of some of his supporters."


Looks like the Shirtless One is pretty much in a league of his own with his geocentrism crusade.
Click to expand...
He claims a bunch of scientists support the geocentric theory…I’m still waiting for him to name drop a couple
 
What baffles me is, what could possibly be his fascination with it? Unless he is just trying to cause trouble, and since he knows that almost no one here buys his questionable science, that also puts the age of the universe at 12.8 billion years, he is accomplishing his goal.
 
Bob Jones V said:
What baffles me is, what could possibly be his fascination with it? Unless he is just trying to cause trouble, and since he knows that almost no one here buys his questionable science, that also puts the age of the universe at 12.8 billion years, he is accomplishing his goal.
Click to expand...
Just because we don't accept these wacky theories, and that's just what they are, presented by Ekk doesn't mean we have to accept the 12.8 billion-year-old timeline. It's not acceptable to hold to a position that can't be Biblical.
 
Bob Jones V said:
What baffles me is, what could possibly be his fascination with it? Unless he is just trying to cause trouble, and since he knows that almost no one here buys his questionable science, that also puts the age of the universe at 12.8 billion years, he is accomplishing his goal.
Click to expand...
Me or Hovind? The universe is only thousands of years old.
 
Huk said:
He claims a bunch of scientists support the geocentric theory…I’m still waiting for him to name drop a couple
Click to expand...
I name dropped four, including Einstein and Hawking, who say a geocentric model is a valid model. You haven't been paying attention.
 
AverageJoe said:
Just because we don't accept these wacky theories, and that's just what they are, presented by Ekk doesn't mean we have to accept the 12.8 billion-year-old timeline. It's not acceptable to hold to a position that can't be Biblical.
Click to expand...
I don’t think Christian OR secular scientists take this theory seriously. I’m sure a couple fringe researchers can be found, but they’d be in the extreme minority.
 
Ekklesian said:
I name dropped four, including Einstein and Hawking, who say a geocentric model is a valid model. You haven't been paying attention.
Click to expand...
Einstein is also erroneously on record as discrediting the idea of black holes and an expanding universe. He’s been dead for 67 years, so a few new discoveries have been made.
 
Huk said:
I don’t think Christian OR secular scientists take this theory seriously. I’m sure a couple fringe researchers can be found, but they’d be in the extreme minority.
Click to expand...

I can only think of two notable geocentrists off the top of my head. One is Gerardus Bouw, who has an earned Ph.D. in astronomy. The other is Robert Sungenis, who is a Roman Catholic apologist, and has no credentials in the sciences.

That said...

Internationally known astrophysicist Gerardus D. Bouw, Ph.D, was the first scholar to document evidence that huge clusters of galaxies rotate. He writes regarding the book New Age Bible Versions,
"A monumental piece of research work. I've sent copies to over a dozen skeptics and none have come up with any substantial arguments against Riplingers work."​
(G. A. Riplinger, Blind Guides [AV Publications, 1995], 30.)​

Riplinger is citing Bouw in support of her ridiculous "acrostic algebra." If he actually found her work unassailable, it doesn't say much about his critical thinking, either.
 
Last edited:
Ransom said:
The other is Robert Sungenis, who is a Roman Catholic apologist, and has no credentials in the sciences.
Click to expand...
Not only that, he also has a “doctorate” from an unaccredited college in an island country I’d never even heard of.
 
Ransom said:
I can only think of two notable geocentrists off the top of my head. One is Gerardus Bouw, who has an earned Ph.D. in astronomy. The other is Robert Sungenis, who is a Roman Catholic apologist, and has no credentials in the sciences.

That said...

Internationally known astrophysicist Gerardus D. Bouw, Ph.D, was the first scholar to document evidence that huge clusters of galaxies rotate. He writes regarding the book New Age Bible Versions,​
"A monumental piece of research work. I've sent copies to over a dozen skeptics and none have come up with any substantial arguments against Riplingers work."​

(G. A. Riplinger, Blind Guides [AV Publications, 1995], 30.)​

Riplinger is citing Bouw in support of her ridiculous "acrostic algebra." If he actually found her work unassailable, it doesn't say much about his critical thinking, either.
Click to expand...
Red Herring.
 
Huk said:
Einstein is also erroneously on record as discrediting the idea of black holes and an expanding universe. He’s been dead for 67 years, so a few new discoveries have been made.
Click to expand...
🤣 Einstien is the Apostle of the motion of the earth.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top