A New Site For Reform In Fundamentalism

I have no problem with what you said.....
My point is that I would rather have Christ, I don't care about being an "American patriot"(except the New England Patriots ;) ) I think too many times we get wound up about saving America and not worried about what God wants from us
 
Jesus doesn't 'set you free'.  He 'makes you free'.  At least in the AV.

Anishinabe

 
Recovering IFB said:
I have no problem with what you said.....
My point is that I would rather have Christ, I don't care about being an "American patriot"(except the New England Patriots ;) ) I think too many times we get wound up about saving America and not worried about what God wants from us
Even though I served in the military, I cannot muster up loyalty to this infanticide committing, queer tolerating, theiving country.
I love the America that now only exists as yesterday's ideas.

Anishinabe

 
Recovering IFB said:
I don't care about being an "American patriot"(except the New England Patriots ;)
great post,! Thanks it removes all doubt, yes sir you are a WASTE of skin
 
pastorryanhayden said:
I wonder if he is against saying the pledge of allegiance.

Now that we know he is he would also need to be against an oath of marriage as well to be consistent. This is just an example of going over the edge a bit IMO.
 
Just John said:
pastorryanhayden said:
I wonder if he is against saying the pledge of allegiance.

Now that we know he is he would also need to be against an oath of marriage as well to be consistent. This is just an example of going over the edge a bit IMO.

Are you saying that scripture that has been referenced in the NT & the OT do not apply at all and just taking up spaces in the Bible?

The marriage covenant is God's idea, not man's so your rebuttal does not apply since it is God Who joins them together and not the vows of the bride & the bridegroom as some do make and say them to each other at the marriage altar today.

You will not find any example of a marriage vow in the Bible where the bride & the bridegroom say to each other as some do today.  It is either "yes" or "I do" in response to taking the other as a spouse.

Since Jesus spoke against making any vows that are His to keep via by the New Covenant, then doing so is not living the christian life by faith in the Son of God, and scripture did say that without faith, it is impossible to please God:  Hebrews 11:6 as the law is not of faith: 

Romans 3:28Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.

Romans 4:13 For the promise, that he should be the heir of the world, was not to Abraham, or to his seed, through the law, but through the righteousness of faith. 14 For if they which are of the law be heirs, faith is made void, and the promise made of none effect: 15 Because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, there is no transgression.

Romans 9:32Wherefore? Because they sought it not by faith, but as it were by the works of the law. For they stumbled at that stumblingstone;

Galatians 2:16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified. 17 But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, we ourselves also are found sinners, is therefore Christ the minister of sin? God forbid. 18 For if I build again the things which I destroyed, I make myself a transgressor. 19 For I through the law am dead to the law, that I might live unto God. 20 I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me. 21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.

Hebrews 4:1Let us therefore fear, lest, a promise being left us of entering into his rest, any of you should seem to come short of it. 2 For unto us was the gospel preached, as well as unto them: but the word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in them that heard it. 3 For we which have believed do enter into rest, as he said, As I have sworn in my wrath, if they shall enter into my rest: although the works were finished from the foundation of the world....9 There remaineth therefore a rest to the people of God. 10 For he that is entered into his rest, he also hath ceased from his own works, as God did from his. 11 Let us labour therefore to enter into that rest, lest any man fall after the same example of unbelief.

If any believer finds living the christian life too hard because they cannot keep their commitment, promise, or pledge to Him, then before they walk away, surrender from keeping that oath and ask Jesus to set you free to rest in Him and His promises to you that He will help you to live as His as He is the power for living the christian life when we live that reconciled relationship with God by faith in Jesus Christ and not by the deeds of the law wherein men can boast.
 
The two NT prohibitions of swearing oaths come from Jesus and James. Both say to let your "yea be yea and your nay nay." Were they saying that one should never ever swear an oath, or were they saying that one should not swear frivolous oaths?

In the context of the NT, Paul swore several oaths...
  -Philippians 1:8  For God is my record, how greatly I long after you all in the bowels of Jesus Christ.
  -Romans 1:9 For God is my witness, whom I serve with my spirit in the gospel of his Son, that without   
                        ceasing I make mention of you always in my prayers;
  -1 Thessalonians 2:5 For neither at any time used we flattering words, as ye know, nor a cloke of
                                    covetousness; God is witness:

An angel swore and oath...
  -Revelation 10:5-6 5And the angel which I saw stand upon the sea and upon the earth lifted up his
                                hand to heaven,6And sware by him that liveth for ever and ever, who created 
                                heaven, and the things that therein are, and the earth, and the things that therein
                                are, and the sea, and the things which are therein, that there should be time no
                                longer:

God Himself swore an oath...
  -Hebrews 6:13 For when God made promise to Abraham, because he could swear by no greater, he
                          sware by himself,


When Jesus railed against the Pharisees for their oaths (Matthew 23:16-22), he especially had a problem with the fact that they so carefully worded their oaths that they could find a clause to get out of them if they needed.

James gives good advice...He says "Just live in such a way that your word is believed without an oath." In both James and Jesus' teaching, they are condemning the practice of swearing frivolous oaths rather than laying a blanket prohibition on all oaths.

If they laid out a blanket prohibition of all oaths, then Paul (under inspiration) disobeyed Jesus in his writing. That would be terribly inconsistent.
 
Boomer said:
The two NT prohibitions of swearing oaths come from Jesus and James. Both say to let your "yea be yea and your nay nay." Were they saying that one should never ever swear an oath, or were they saying that one should not swear frivolous oaths?
Jesus cannot say it plainer than that in Matthew 5:36 because your oath means you have to do it and God cannot help you to do it ( Numbers 30:2 ) as He expects you to finish it and not leave it undone as it is a work of your hands that will be destroyed for not finishing it.  Ecclesiates 5:1-7

In the context of the NT, Paul swore several oaths...
  -Philippians 1:8  For God is my record, how greatly I long after you all in the bowels of Jesus Christ.
  -Romans 1:9 For God is my witness, whom I serve with my spirit in the gospel of his Son, that without   
                        ceasing I make mention of you always in my prayers;
  -1 Thessalonians 2:5 For neither at any time used we flattering words, as ye know, nor a cloke of
                                    covetousness; God is witness:

That is not an oath when testifying that God is a witness of the truth of what Paul is saying.

You really think that a person can make an oath that forces God to be a witness of Him?

An angel swore and oath...
  -Revelation 10:5-6 5And the angel which I saw stand upon the sea and upon the earth lifted up his
                                hand to heaven,6And sware by him that liveth for ever and ever, who created 
                                heaven, and the things that therein are, and the earth, and the things that therein
                                are, and the sea, and the things which are therein, that there should be time no
                                longer:

Angels haven't sinned and are able to make an oath that they can finish.

God Himself swore an oath...
  -Hebrews 6:13 For when God made promise to Abraham, because he could swear by no greater, he
                          sware by himself,

The fact that God has made the New Covenant suggests that it is not lacking anything that we need to tack our filthy rags of righteousness over His work in us.

When Jesus railed against the Pharisees for their oaths (Matthew 23:16-22), he especially had a problem with the fact that they so carefully worded their oaths that they could find a clause to get out of them if they needed.

Like the Promise Keepers' movement provided a way out by saying if they break their promise, God will give grace for them to keep trying to keep it?

James gives good advice...He says "Just live in such a way that your word is believed without an oath." In both James and Jesus' teaching, they are condemning the practice of swearing frivolous oaths rather than laying a blanket prohibition on all oaths.

No.  Jesus & James was saying that an oath puts a believer under the law and if they do not finish it, they fall into condemnation.  That is why the just shall live by faith in the Son of God & all His promises to us for He will keep His promises so where is our faith in Him that He will?

If they laid out a blanket prohibition of all oaths, then Paul (under inspiration) disobeyed Jesus in his writing. That would be terribly inconsistent.

Again, I fail to see how testifying of how God is a witness to what Paul was saying is the same as swearing an oath.  Paul knows how to make an oath plainly and I do not see that as hidden in the references you had shared.
 
Enow said:
Just John said:
pastorryanhayden said:
I wonder if he is against saying the pledge of allegiance.

Now that we know he is he would also need to be against an oath of marriage as well to be consistent. This is just an example of going over the edge a bit IMO.

Are you saying that scripture that has been referenced in the NT & the OT do not apply at all and just taking up spaces in the Bible?

The marriage covenant is God's idea, not man's so your rebuttal does not apply since it is God Who joins them together and not the vows of the bride & the bridegroom as some do make and say them to each other at the marriage altar today.

You will not find any example of a marriage vow in the Bible where the bride & the bridegroom say to each other as some do today.  It is either "yes" or "I do" in response to taking the other as a spouse.

Since Jesus spoke against making any vows that are His to keep via by the New Covenant, then doing so is not living the christian life by faith in the Son of God, and scripture did say that without faith, it is impossible to please God:  Hebrews 11:6 as the law is not of faith: 

Romans 3:28Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.

Romans 4:13 For the promise, that he should be the heir of the world, was not to Abraham, or to his seed, through the law, but through the righteousness of faith. 14 For if they which are of the law be heirs, faith is made void, and the promise made of none effect: 15 Because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, there is no transgression.

Romans 9:32Wherefore? Because they sought it not by faith, but as it were by the works of the law. For they stumbled at that stumblingstone;

Galatians 2:16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified. 17 But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, we ourselves also are found sinners, is therefore Christ the minister of sin? God forbid. 18 For if I build again the things which I destroyed, I make myself a transgressor. 19 For I through the law am dead to the law, that I might live unto God. 20 I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me. 21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.

Hebrews 4:1Let us therefore fear, lest, a promise being left us of entering into his rest, any of you should seem to come short of it. 2 For unto us was the gospel preached, as well as unto them: but the word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in them that heard it. 3 For we which have believed do enter into rest, as he said, As I have sworn in my wrath, if they shall enter into my rest: although the works were finished from the foundation of the world....9 There remaineth therefore a rest to the people of God. 10 For he that is entered into his rest, he also hath ceased from his own works, as God did from his. 11 Let us labour therefore to enter into that rest, lest any man fall after the same example of unbelief.

If any believer finds living the christian life too hard because they cannot keep their commitment, promise, or pledge to Him, then before they walk away, surrender from keeping that oath and ask Jesus to set you free to rest in Him and His promises to you that He will help you to live as His as He is the power for living the christian life when we live that reconciled relationship with God by faith in Jesus Christ and not by the deeds of the law wherein men can boast.

Well, apparently you are against a marriage vow, promise or oath. Kudos for consistency.
 
pastorryanhayden said:
Boomer, where is the like button on FFF?

To the left of the post, notice the green and red thumbs up or down. You can commend or rebuke the post by using them.
 
Enow said:
Boomer said:
The two NT prohibitions of swearing oaths come from Jesus and James. Both say to let your "yea be yea and your nay nay." Were they saying that one should never ever swear an oath, or were they saying that one should not swear frivolous oaths?
Jesus cannot say it plainer than that in Matthew 5:36 because your oath means you have to do it and God cannot help you to do it ( Numbers 30:2 ) as He expects you to finish it and not leave it undone as it is a work of your hands that will be destroyed for not finishing it.  Ecclesiates 5:1-7

In the context of the NT, Paul swore several oaths...
  -Philippians 1:8  For God is my record, how greatly I long after you all in the bowels of Jesus Christ.
  -Romans 1:9 For God is my witness, whom I serve with my spirit in the gospel of his Son, that without   
                        ceasing I make mention of you always in my prayers;
  -1 Thessalonians 2:5 For neither at any time used we flattering words, as ye know, nor a cloke of
                                    covetousness; God is witness:

That is not an oath when testifying that God is a witness of the truth of what Paul is saying.

You really think that a person can make an oath that forces God to be a witness of Him?

An angel swore and oath...
  -Revelation 10:5-6 5And the angel which I saw stand upon the sea and upon the earth lifted up his
                                hand to heaven,6And sware by him that liveth for ever and ever, who created 
                                heaven, and the things that therein are, and the earth, and the things that therein
                                are, and the sea, and the things which are therein, that there should be time no
                                longer:

Angels haven't sinned and are able to make an oath that they can finish.

God Himself swore an oath...
  -Hebrews 6:13 For when God made promise to Abraham, because he could swear by no greater, he
                          sware by himself,

The fact that God has made the New Covenant suggests that it is not lacking anything that we need to tack our filthy rags of righteousness over His work in us.

When Jesus railed against the Pharisees for their oaths (Matthew 23:16-22), he especially had a problem with the fact that they so carefully worded their oaths that they could find a clause to get out of them if they needed.

Like the Promise Keepers' movement provided a way out by saying if they break their promise, God will give grace for them to keep trying to keep it?

James gives good advice...He says "Just live in such a way that your word is believed without an oath." In both James and Jesus' teaching, they are condemning the practice of swearing frivolous oaths rather than laying a blanket prohibition on all oaths.

No.  Jesus & James was saying that an oath puts a believer under the law and if they do not finish it, they fall into condemnation.  That is why the just shall live by faith in the Son of God & all His promises to us for He will keep His promises so where is our faith in Him that He will?

If they laid out a blanket prohibition of all oaths, then Paul (under inspiration) disobeyed Jesus in his writing. That would be terribly inconsistent.

Again, I fail to see how testifying of how God is a witness to what Paul was saying is the same as swearing an oath.  Paul knows how to make an oath plainly and I do not see that as hidden in the references you had shared.

oath  [ohth]  Show IPA
noun, plural oaths  [ohthz, ohths]  Show IPA .
1.
a solemn appeal to a deity, or to some revered person or thing, to witness one's determination to speak the truth, to keep a promise, etc.: to testify upon oath.
2.
a statement or promise strengthened by such an appeal.
3.
a formally affirmed statement or promise accepted as an equivalent of an appeal to a deity or to a revered person or thing; affirmation.
4.
the form of words in which such a statement or promise is made.
 
Recovering IFB said:
The very same reasoning and logic that puts you at the center of all... Let me ask you, how many other elders are at your assembly?

You call a doctor ... doctor or a judge ... your honor. What is wrong with calling someone a pastor? It is a show of respect not worship.
 
Pastor Marty said:
Recovering IFB said:
The very same reasoning and logic that puts you at the center of all... Let me ask you, how many other elders are at your assembly?

You call a doctor ... doctor or a judge ... your honor. What is wrong with calling someone a pastor? It is a show of respect not worship.

I don't have a problem showing respect as states earlier, but when it is required then there is an issue, which has been my experience.
So Marty, let me ask you. How many elders are in your church? Or are you the mog?
 
Recovering IFB said:
Pastor Marty said:
Recovering IFB said:
The very same reasoning and logic that puts you at the center of all... Let me ask you, how many other elders are at your assembly?

You call a doctor ... doctor or a judge ... your honor. What is wrong with calling someone a pastor? It is a show of respect not worship.

I don't have a problem showing respect as states earlier, but when it is required then there is an issue, which has been my experience.
So Marty, let me ask you. How many elders are in your church? Or are you the mog?

As I have posted before, a plurality of elders is not a church leadership panacea.
 
Tarheel Baptist said:
Recovering IFB said:
Pastor Marty said:
Recovering IFB said:
The very same reasoning and logic that puts you at the center of all... Let me ask you, how many other elders are at your assembly?

You call a doctor ... doctor or a judge ... your honor. What is wrong with calling someone a pastor? It is a show of respect not worship.

I don't have a problem showing respect as states earlier, but when it is required then there is an issue, which has been my experience.
So Marty, let me ask you. How many elders are in your church? Or are you the mog?

As I have posted before, a plurality of elders is not a church leadership panacea.

TB, I'm on my phone now, I posted verses earlier, if you want I'll get them when I'm home.
 
Tarheel said:

As I have posted before, a plurality of elders is not a church leadership panacea.

Neither is a system of checks and balances a civil government panacea, but it's a big improvement over an absolute monarch that talks to trees.
 
Ransom said:
Tarheel said:

As I have posted before, a plurality of elders is not a church leadership panacea.

Neither is a system of checks and balances a civil government panacea, but it's a big improvement over an absolute monarch that talks to trees.

Plurality of elders is not always a check and balance system.
It depends on the people involved more than the system in place.
 
Back
Top