- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 11,401
- Reaction score
- 2,415
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Tarheel Baptist said:That's not really an apples to apples comparison, is it?
The royal family's role is mostly ceremonial, isn't it?
Sure. But aren't there ceremonial aspects to your own system that are still important? The State of the Union Address, for example, is pretty much ceremonial - as I understand it, there's no constitutional reason the President couldn't just submit a report - and yet it's considered important enough to have the Prez address a joint meeting of both houses of Congress.
Ditto public swearing-in ceremonies, the conventions at which the various political parties officially nominate their presidential candidates, Inauguration Day, and so forth. All that ceremonial pomp is part of your political process. A royal family is part of ours.
And besides all that, Canada is a sovereign nation?!
Sure. We pass our own laws, elect our own officials, no longer go to war just because England does, and since 1982 can amend our own constitution without permission of the British parliament. The Queen doesn't tell us what to do. For that matter, she doesn't tell the British parliament what to do, either. She's a ceremonial monarch with some very rarely used reserve powers.