GeneFrenkle said:RAIDER said:Trying to determine what did and didn't happen in the past is a bit difficult. Those that aren't fans of Hyles or the IFB movement seem to believe every accusation that has been levied. Those who are fans of Hyles and the IFB movement don't want to believe any of the accusations. After all of these years I find myself in the middle. Do I believe Dr. Hyles was told about Dave's behavior? Absolutely. Dis he know this when Dave moved to Texas? Absolutely. Do I believe all the Nischik stories? No. Do I believe Linda's stories? Absolutely not. Currently, I believe Dave Hyles did a tremendous amount of damage. I believe Jack Schaap did a tremendous amount of damage. I believe Jack Hyles made some poor staff decisions for the church and college.
Nicely put...this is about where I stand. I don't know what or when Dr. Hyles knew about David, but if he knew I wonder if he was hoping that David would get his act together. Not the right thing to do (if that was indeed the case), but I can see that happening.
Schaap was the pastor there for two years while I was there. I found that what a lot of people were saying from outside of FBC were taken out of context...I was there. Especially the tithing and finances teaching. I was never steered toward Kimmel or anyone else...and don't feel particularly sad for people who were duped by him. He said some crazy things, yes.
I think Jack Hyles' main problem is that he surrounded himself with "yes" men.
Kimmel's influence did not grow till later. Eventually, he taught a 6:00 class on finaces, taught Personal Finance and Financial Counseling at the college and was given an office on State St (If I remember) where he took over all of Schaap's counseling that involved finances. He sponsored several of Schaap's Acts 9:21(Cant remember the exact name of the group) pastors meetings and was given a platform to network with these men.
Hyles' problem in that regard, as stated by several men who knew and worked with him closely, was that he was to insecure to keep men around him. All the good men at FBC and HAC that had differences with him were driven away by insecure anger, and he was left with men much younger than he, who were as you said "yes men". It is painfully obvious the Hyles could not lead and keep men close to him who would be considered his contemporaries.