Unorthodox Teachings of Peter Ruckman

illinoisguy said:
Alberto Rivera taught that the Jesuits were on the KJV translation committee. Rivera's 1998-99 AIC International Ministries catalog states under "Questions and Startling Facts surrounding the 1611 translation:" that "The 1611 King James originally included the Apocrypha. . . . the translation committee contained devoted Puritan scholars but it was also infiltrated by Jesuits." I was informed in a letter from Jack Chick, President, Chick Publications, that "Dr. Rivera told me the Jesuits infiltrated the translation committee and insisted that the Apocrypha be included in the very first printing."

So there you have it - according to Rivera, the AV1611 was a Catholic Bible whose text was "corrupted" by the wily Jesuits. Rivera's AIC catalog promoted what he called "THE FIRST PURE PROTESTANT BIBLE! . . . THE MOST IMPORTANT BIBLE TRANSLATION OF OUR TIME. . . . A PURE BIBLE TRANSLATION - this 1655 editions [sic] is the fruit of their work."

Imagine that - all these years we have been promoting the AV1611, when we should have been promoting the AV1655. Looks like those of us (like me,) who have been using the AV1611, need to throw it out and get a copy of the "First Pure Protestant Bible, " the AV1655. Please make a note of it.
Click to expand...
I had not heard that. That has to make the KJVO crowd apprehensive about giving him too much credibility.
 
So now that everyone knows tmjbog lied about being a half-Arminian FWB who attends a non-FWB IFB church "for reasons that will not be detailed",
but is in actuality a Catholic (I don't know why you couldn't just be honest about it).

We can now conclude that Ruckman is very dangerous to the Catholics for them to go through these unnecessary measures just to smear him.
If you'd like to learn about the truth, all you have to do is look back at everything tmjbog the lying Catholic was attacking.

People, although not everything Ruckman taught was right, you should probably go read Ruckman if he's annoying the devil that much.
 
UGC said:
View attachment 1175
Click to expand...
But wouldn't you think a Jesuit would not be obvious? Or maybe I'm just being obvious to throw you off since no self respecting Jesuit would be that obvious. Therefore I must be a Jesuit. Or would being blatantly obvious prove that the obvious conclusion must be correct and therefor I must not be a Jesuit. Or maybe by obviously proving I'm not a Jesuit it's only to cover the fact that I am a Jesuit.
 
tmjbog all you have to do is state your position on Catholic doctrine, especially their doctrine of salvation to prove me wrong.

It's really that simple. Anyone could do it. Just say it: "Catholics believe in a heretical works salvation, I reject the Catholic church, before God I am not a Catholic."

Go ahead. Shouldn't be too hard.
 
Has anyone brought up Ruckman's support for abortion, yet?
 
UGC said:
So now that everyone knows tmjbog lied about being a half-Arminian FWB who attends a non-FWB IFB church "for reasons that will not be detailed",
but is in actuality a Catholic (I don't know why you couldn't just be honest about it).

We can now conclude that Ruckman is very dangerous to the Catholics for them to go through these unnecessary measures just to smear him.
If you'd like to learn about the truth, all you have to do is look back at everything tmjbog the lying Catholic was attacking.

People, although not everything Ruckman taught was right, you should probably go read Ruckman if he's annoying the devil that much.
Click to expand...
To be honest UCG lied (kinda their specialty) about tmjbog being half-Arminian.

Ruckman needs no one to attack him. Let me give you example. No commentary necessary. All I have to do is post what he actually said:

Lucifer, with one crown on his head, saw immediately that the only way to go out into outer space and take the throne (which he first set his heart on), was to produce a race of Super-humans, who would obey him. Gen 6:1-4 is where this operation is conceived and carried out, and it showed every possibility of being a perfect plan of invasion. (Ruckman, Peter. The Sure Word of Prophecy, p. 94)
 
tmjbog said:
UGC, you gotta figure out what you are man you post articles about Episcopalian and Catholics. So are you Episcopalian or Catholic. You gotta get your theology straight before you go out there posting videos. First you say your dispensationalist, then Catholic, then Episcopalian. How's anyone to figure out your revolving story.
Click to expand...
LOL!
 
Everyone reading this thread rn
audience.gif
 
UGC said:
Oo, timing. What about you, FSSL. Are you a Catholic?
Click to expand...
Yes, UCG thinks since he's got 5-6 videos on you tube he has become a threat to the Catholic church and they are sending their troops for him.
 
UGC said:
Oo, timing. What about you, FSSL. Are you a Catholic?
Click to expand...

So... your answer to Ruckman's view of abortion is "FSSL are you a Catholic?"
I guess I have to wait for a video for another non-answer.
 
UGC said:
So now that everyone knows tmjbog lied about being a half-Arminian FWB who attends a non-FWB IFB church "for reasons that will not be detailed",
but is in actuality a Catholic
Click to expand...

"tmj" - The Masked Jesuit?

"bog" - dropped the "r" to hide that he is a Jesuit Borg who will assimilate you. "Resistance is futile"
 
FSSL said:
So... your answer to Ruckman's view of abortion is "FSSL are you a Catholic?"
I guess I have to wait for a video for another non-answer.
Click to expand...
You injected at the wrong time. We were already exposing how tmjbog is actually a Catholic.

Did you know that, FSSL?
 
FSSL said:
So... your answer to Ruckman's view of abortion is "FSSL are you a Catholic?"
I guess I have to wait for a video for another non-answer.
Click to expand...
Well here's a little nugget from Ruckman himself:

I do not teach that abortion is murder, although I grant that a Fundamentalist can teach that if he wants. I don't teach it for two reasons. In the first place, the clear scriptures in Genesis 2, as well as Job 30, 31, and Ezekiel 37, teach that there is no life in the human sense until there is breath. … However, I have noticed something about them that puts them in a very bad light. Not one of them recommends capital punishment for the murderer. This shows me they don't believe the Bible even when they profess to believe it. (Ruckman, Peter. Bible Believers' Bulletin. October 1990, p. 9)
 
*ehem*

Let's try again.

tmjbog all you have to do is state your position on Catholic doctrine, especially their doctrine of salvation to prove me wrong.

It's really that simple. Anyone could do it. Just say it: "Catholics believe in a heretical works salvation, I reject the Catholic church, before God I am not a Catholic."

Go ahead. Shouldn't be too hard.
 
Oh, the suspense.

"Is he right? How can he know for sure? He can't possibly know. He's just guessing... right?"
audience.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top