ALAYMAN said:
rsc2a said:
No. I want you to actually look at something before you decide to criticize it. Here, you are being critical of a book you've never read. In fact, you clearly have no idea what the book even says or you would know your criticism makes absolutely no sense. Of course, it's not the first time that you start criticizing something you have no idea about simply because you think that your made-up version of whatever that something is is wrong.
I've read enough about it by people I trust, and the fact that you're defending it seals the deal.
1. I'm stating that you should stop criticizing things with which you have no familiarity based on what you think they are saying. A much better plan would be to actually familiarize yourself with the item in question then make a reasoned critique based on what is actually being stated. Seriously, you remind me of the pastor I heard whose biggest criticism of the Catholic church was that they deny the divinity of Christ. (In other words, he didn't have a clue what he was actually talking about and failed to even do basic fact checking.)
2. I'm not defending the book. I'm actually think Viola's premise is flat wrong. I've been harshly critical of much of what he has written in other places.
3. Even if I was defending his book, to reject it because I would defend it is flat stupid. I defend the doctrine of the Trinity. Are you going to toss it because it's something I hold to?
[quote author=ALAYMAN][quote author=rsc2a]Ok...
"Alayman no longer believes in God."
...I said something about you. Does it make make that statement true?
And, no, your link doesn't say that about the prosecution having emails stating that. The article says the emails state that the singer was having an affair and no longer loves his wife. The statement you are referring to is a separate paragraph that states, "he also told her he no longer believes in God," a statement I have already shown amounts to hearsay.
Did he decide he no longer believes in God? I have no idea. But, he hasn't made any public claims either way, and you are basing your assumptions on the words of someone who has plenty of (very understandable) reasons to say all kinds of things about his character.[/quote]
He goes from Liberty grad, to a form of agnosticism, to calling Catholicism and Protestantism poison, to conspiracy to kill his wife, but there's no inferences need be drawn about his journey and sanctification.
lol, you're so obtuse that it's an insult to all angles everywhere to call you obtuse.[/quote]
If you'd like, I can tell you a story about a guy who goes from anointed of God to checking out a naked woman to sleeping with another man's wife to manipulating that man to get his own way to murdering that man so he could take over the husband role.
What inferences do you draw from that story?
[quote author=ALAYMAN]
rsc2a said:
No. I promote the whole "Alayman blaming this on what he perceives to be someone flirting with the 'fringes of acceptable conservative Christian culture' thing" is stupid.
Apostasy and carnality are linked in Scripture. If you deny that you are more of a dimbulb than I thought.[/quote]
Sure they are linked. What apparently isn't clear to you is whether your definition of "carnal" and the Bible's usage of that word line up. (They don't.)