The Worthless Thread for Specifically Increasing Post Numbers

16KJV11 said:
Twisted said:
16KJV11 said:
Twisted said:
Twisted said:
Twisted said:
16KJV11 said:
Twisted said:
I feel like a nice slice of Sunbeam.
Toasted or untoasted?

Toasted...with real butter.

Grape?  Strawberry?  Jam?  Jelly?
But jelly.....what flavor?
Toe jam

Too gritty.
But you have to admit, it has a real kick!

And...it's renewable!
 
Twisted said:
16KJV11 said:
Twisted said:
16KJV11 said:
Twisted said:
Twisted said:
Twisted said:
16KJV11 said:
Twisted said:
I feel like a nice slice of Sunbeam.
Toasted or untoasted?

Toasted...with real butter.

Grape?  Strawberry?  Jam?  Jelly?
But jelly.....what flavor?
Toe jam

Too gritty.
But you have to admit, it has a real kick!

And...it's renewable!
Don't forget the heel, it's mighty tasty...
 
Okay, after so many of you hearing of all my proclivities and wierdness and pet peeves, here is another. Why or why with all the crime, murder, drugs, DUI's, etc. will local police departments decide to focus ticketing people who are not wearing seat belts? You come over a hill and there are like 25 cops whose only focus is on those felonious seat belt violators! So much for law and order!
IMO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
BALAAM said:
Okay, after so many of you hearing of all my proclivities and wierdness and pet peeves, here is another. Why or why with all the crime, murder, drugs, DUI's, etc. will local police departments decide to focus ticketing people who are not wearing seat belts? You come over a hill and there are like 25 cops whose only focus is on those felonious seat belt violators! So much for law and order!
IMO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The federal government has grants for state with strict seat belt laws and that agree to participate in special enforcement programs such as Participation in ?Click-it-or-Ticket national mobilization?. The total federal budget for state highway safety grants is 585 million dollars. Occupant protection grants are about 43 million a year. In the year 2011 alone the federal government issued 124 million in section 206 seat belt enforcement grants. Most of these grant require matching funds from the state?s budget.

23 U.S. Code ? Section 405 Occupant Protection Incentive Grants
23 U.S. Code ? Section 406 Safety Belt Performance Grants

It?s all about the money

 
sword said:
BALAAM said:
Okay, after so many of you hearing of all my proclivities and wierdness and pet peeves, here is another. Why or why with all the crime, murder, drugs, DUI's, etc. will local police departments decide to focus ticketing people who are not wearing seat belts? You come over a hill and there are like 25 cops whose only focus is on those felonious seat belt violators! So much for law and order!
IMO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The federal government has grants for state with strict seat belt laws and that agree to participate in special enforcement programs such as Participation in ?Click-it-or-Ticket national mobilization?. The total federal budget for state highway safety grants is 585 million dollars. Occupant protection grants are about 43 million a year. In the year 2011 alone the federal government issued 124 million in section 206 seat belt enforcement grants. Most of these grant require matching funds from the state?s budget.

23 U.S. Code ? Section 405 Occupant Protection Incentive Grants
23 U.S. Code ? Section 406 Safety Belt Performance Grants

It?s all about the money

It still bothers me! Priorities you know.
 
If I had a dollar for every gender that exists today then I'd have two dollars!
 
16KJV11 said:
If I had a dollar for every gender that exists today then I'd have two dollars!

Bruce Jenner wants to talk to you about a loan.
 
Not sure which one is the mother, but happy fag mom's day to you!

https://www.yahoo.com/tv/jim-parsons-marries-longtime-partner-190900223.html
 
Twisted said:
Not sure which one is the mother, but happy fag mom's day to you!

https://www.yahoo.com/tv/jim-parsons-marries-longtime-partner-190900223.html

Not expecting you to agree with their decision but there really isn't a reason to use the term fag. Since they have no chlldren and neither is a woman there is not mother but my guess is you knew that. Sounds like they have been faithful for 14 years which is something a lot of heterosexual couples can't claim. 
 
LongGone said:
Twisted said:
Not sure which one is the mother, but happy fag mom's day to you!

https://www.yahoo.com/tv/jim-parsons-marries-longtime-partner-190900223.html

Not expecting you to agree with their decision but there really isn't a reason to use the term fag. Since they have no chlldren and neither is a woman there is not mother but my guess is you knew that. Sounds like they have been faithful for 14 years which is something a lot of heterosexual couples can't claim.

Oh, there's every reason to use the term fag.  And it's nice that you praise sexual deviants and perverts for being "faithful".  That's real sweet.
 
LongGone said:
Twisted said:
Not sure which one is the mother, but happy fag mom's day to you!

https://www.yahoo.com/tv/jim-parsons-marries-longtime-partner-190900223.html

Not expecting you to agree with their decision but there really isn't a reason to use the term fag. Since they have no chlldren and neither is a woman there is not mother but my guess is you knew that. Sounds like they have been faithful for 14 years which is something a lot of heterosexual couples can't claim.

I believe the mafia has a code of ethics also. Wonderful people you know.
 
LongGone said:
Twisted said:
Not sure which one is the mother, but happy fag mom's day to you!

https://www.yahoo.com/tv/jim-parsons-marries-longtime-partner-190900223.html

Not expecting you to agree with their decision but there really isn't a reason to use the term fag. Since they have no chlldren and neither is a woman there is not mother but my guess is you knew that. Sounds like they have been faithful for 14 years which is something a lot of heterosexual couples can't claim.
OK...how's SODOMITE suit you?  Any easier on the palate? 
 
LongGone said:
Sounds like they have been faithful for 14 years which is something a lot of heterosexual couples can't claim.

Let me add this:  If you think that they have been monogamous for 14 years, then you are really delusional. 
 
Back
Top