lnf said:
Interesting that someone would think physical anatomy defines "in the image of God" when speaking of a God that is a Spirit lacking any physical anatomy at the time of the creation. In Romans 8 the Scripture says that we are predestined to be conformed to the image of Christ. Does this mean only male Christians will be conformed to the image of Christ? NO! Does this mean we will all become Jewish males when our sanctification is complete? NO! Perhaps the proper understanding of this text would be that we will be conformed to Christ morally, spiritually, emotionally, and mentally. This is the type of wrong thinking and poor hermeneutics that helps channel the natural pride and competitiveness of males to this end instead of a productive end of protecting and providing for women. When males and females are evaluated on physiology alone we miss the real strengths that women bring to the table like empathy, discernment, compassion, etc. I had to learn the hard way that my wife is a gift from God even in ministry because she is a nearly flawless judge of character and I am a hopeless optimist.
I appreciate the fact that you are civil in your point of view. "in the image of God created he him...male and female created he them."
God created man first and created him in His image. Physical anatomy is absolutely one part of that image. Jesus was God in the flesh and He was a man. He was God's SON.
When the Scripture talks about being conformed to the image of Christ, it is talking about His likeness, or how He walked while He was on this earth. And we can all be conformed to the image of Christ as a Christian.
The wife is probably more valuable than the husband in my opinion. Adam was not worth much and so God created Eve. I have never seen any man succeed in the ministry without a fantastic wife who will put up with the garbage that the ministry brings. I am nothing but a pile of dust as it is, but I wouldn't be anything without my wife.
I don't want people to think that just because there is a chain of command and just because the man is above the woman in that chain of command, that the woman is viewed as less significant. That's not my viewpoint at all.