The Best Way To BURN A Catholic Bible PerVersion!

The Rogue Tomato said:
The KJV replaces "Jehovah" with "LORD" in most places, as Jehovah's Witnesses will gladly point out at every opportunity.
Click to expand...
As did the Apostles in the New Testament, thus giving us a Divine example on how to translate the Tetragrammaton to the chagrin of JW's and textual critics alike.
 
Scott, the NIV (New International Vatican) is not "the Bible."

The NIV (New International Vatican) is a wicked satanic counterfeit.

So get your facts straight.
 
Biblebeliever said:
Scott, the NIV (New International Vatican) is not "the Bible."
Click to expand...

You're absolutely right. There is no such thing as the "New International Vatican," so it cannot possibly be "the Bible."

And even if it did exist, it would not be "the Bible," it would be "a Bible," just like the one sitting next to it on the bookshelf.

The NIV (New International Vatican) is a wicked satanic counterfeit.
Click to expand...

It's obviously a very poor wicked satanic counterfeit. You are such an incompetent counterfeiter, you couldn't even get the name right!

So get your facts straight.
Click to expand...

That's a laugh, coming from Captain Malapropism here.

Also, you think burning the Bible is just dandy. Who else in history has burned the Bible? Oh yeah. Catholics and Nazis. Maybe you know what 1 Cor. 15:33 says about the company you keep, but obvously you don't actually believe it. That's why I'm going to stop calling you "Biblebeliever," since that's clearly a farce, and start calling you "Bibleburner."
 
In response to this whole thread and the idiocy of Biblebeliever....Here you go you apostate moron...

 
Biblebeliever said:
So get your facts straight.
Click to expand...

You did not present facts. 

Your biased, unproven opinions are not facts.
 
Ransom said:
You're absolutely right. There is no such thing as the "New International Vatican," so it cannot possibly be "the Bible."
Click to expand...


Scott, the NIV (New International Vatican) is basically the New International Version. I called it the New International Vatican because it is a wicked Vatican perversion.

So I will make sure you understand me more clearly. The New International Version is NOT "the Bible." Nor is it "a Bible."

The New International Version is a Satanic counterfeit for reprobates and apostates.


Ransom said:
And even if it did exist, it would not be "the Bible," it would be "a Bible," just like the one sitting next to it on the bookshelf.
Click to expand...

It is not "a Bible."

It is a Satanic counterfeit.


Ransom said:
It's obviously a very poor wicked satanic counterfeit.
Click to expand...

Yes the NIV is indeed a wicked satanic counterfeit.


Ransom said:
That's a laugh, coming from Captain Malapropism here.

Also, you think burning the Bible is just dandy. Who else in history has burned the Bible? Oh yeah. Catholics and Nazis. Maybe you know what 1 Cor. 15:33 says about the company you keep, but obvously you don't actually believe it. That's why I'm going to stop calling you "Biblebeliever," since that's clearly a farce, and start calling you "Bibleburner."
Click to expand...


The wicked, hellish, and vile papacy and roman catholic church burned Christians at the stake down through the centuries. And the modern versions which are simply Vatican perversions come from the Vatican. And that is a documented fact which apostates such as yourself can't seem to get through your thick head.

And I am going to say this again, the NIV (New International Version), which should just be called the New International Vatican is not "the Bible."

 
logos1560 said:
You did not present facts. 
Click to expand...


Yes I did.

And you can either accept them or just choose to continue in willful ignorance. The choice is yours.
 
Bibleburner said:
he New International Version is the New International Vatican.
Click to expand...

The King James Bible is the King James Batman.

See? Anyone can make up meaningless babble, Bibleburner.
 
Bibleburner said:
Scott, the NIV (New International Vatican) is basically the New International Version. I called it the New International Vatican because it is a wicked Vatican perversion.

The New International Version is NOT "the Bible." Nor is it "a Bible."

The New International Version is a Satanic counterfeit for reprobates and apostates.

It is not "a Bible."

It is a Satanic counterfeit.

Yes the NIV is indeed a wicked satanic counterfeit.

And the modern versions which are simply Vatican perversions

And that is a documented fact

the New International Vatican is not "the Bible."
Click to expand...

Thank you, Bibleburner,, for demonstrating the "intelligence" of KJV-onlyism. Your idea of "documented facts" is simply to repeat your initial lies over and over again. "Is too! Is too! Is too! Is too! Is too! Is too! Is too!"

Proof by two-year-old.

Maybe instead of "Bibleburner," we should just name you "Stampyfoot" instead.

The wicked, hellish, and vile papacy and roman catholic church burned Christians at the stake
Click to expand...

They burned the Scriptures, too. Now Bibleburner wants to follow in the footsteps of his papist role models.

And that is a documented fact which apostates such as yourself can't seem to get through your thick head.
Click to expand...

Funny. In the early church, the apostates were the ones who turned over the Scriptures to Caesar to be destroyed. You know - people who did what you advocated with this thread.

Please explain to us why you should not be regarded as just like them, Bibleburner - a traitor to the Christian faith.
 
Biblebeliever said:
Scott, the NIV (New International Vatican) is not "the Bible."

The NIV (New International Vatican) is a wicked satanic counterfeit.

So get your facts straight.
Click to expand...

Are you saying that the Devil actually publishes a book that shares God's Grace?

Funny. You'd think the Devil wouldn't want people to know about Grace. And yet, EVERY Bible tells the Love story between God and his creation.
 
Biblebeliever said:
The New International Version is the New International Vatican.
Click to expand...

According to what factual basis and according to what consistent just measures can your accusation be supported?

Is it because a Roman Catholic was one of the editors of the Greek text behind the NIV just as a Roman Catholic [Erasmus] was one of the editors of the Greek text behind the KJV?

Can you prove more Roman Catholic influence on the NIV that could be shown to be on the KJV according to the use of consistent, just measures?

Would you skip over the fact that there was a Jesuit who contributed renderings to the KJV through the KJV borrowing several of his renderings from the 1582 Roman Catholic Rheims New Testament?

The Church of England doctrinal views of the makers of the KJV were more in agreement with Roman Catholic doctrinal views than the doctrinal views of the translators of the NIV would be.
 
This one is for BibleBurner

The Romanists therefore in refusing to hear, and daring to burn the Word translated, did no less than offend the Spirit of grace, from Whom originally it proceeded, and whose sense and meaning (as well as would enable man in his weakness to understand) it did express.
 
logos1560 said:
Biblebeliever said:
The New International Version is the New International Vatican.
Click to expand...



According to what factual basis and according to what consistent just measures can your accusation be supported?

Is it because a Roman Catholic was one of the editors of the Greek text behind the NIV just as a Roman Catholic [Erasmus] was one of the editors of the Greek text behind the KJV?

Can you prove more Roman Catholic influence on the NIV that could be shown to be on the KJV according to the use of consistent, just measures?

Would you skip over the fact that there was a Jesuit who contributed renderings to the KJV through the KJV borrowing several of his renderings from the 1582 Roman Catholic Rheims New Testament?

The Church of England doctrinal views of the makers of the KJV were more in agreement with Roman Catholic doctrinal views than the doctrinal views of the translators of the NIV would be.
Click to expand...

That will leave a mark...not that BB will honestly deal with it...but it will leave a mark.
 
Alexandrian Apostate said:
Your idea of "documented facts" is simply to repeat your initial lies over and over again. "Is too! Is too! Is too! Is too! Is too! Is too! Is too!"
Click to expand...


It is not my idea.

The facts are the facts. And whether Alexandrian apostates such as yourself accept them or not does not change those facts.


And here is some more documented proof that the modern versions are simply Vatican perversions.

New Bible Versions Are Vatican PerVersions(1 of 3)


Alexandrian Apostate said:
Please explain to us why you should not be regarded as just like them
Click to expand...


Because I am not an apostate. I believe what I profess to believe.
 
Tim said:
Are you saying that the Devil actually publishes a book that shares God's Grace?
Click to expand...


Tim, of course the Devil has his own bibles. One thing most modern professing Christians seem to have forgotten is that the Devil is very subtil.


Satan's main bible is not going to be Anton LaVey's Satanic bible. Satan's real bible is going to look very similar to God's Bible. Why? Because Satan is a master counterfeiter. Remember, Satan is very subtil.


And his main attack is always toward the words of God Almighty. One of the very first recorded words of Satan is where he is questioning what God said:


Genesis 3:1
Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)

3 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?
 
logos1560 said:
According to what factual basis and according to what consistent just measures can your accusation be supported?
Click to expand...


Sure I can logos1560:



New Bible Versions Are Vatican PerVersions(1 of 3)


VERY shocking information Proving that the New "Bible" Versions produced since 1881 (RV, ASV, NRSV, NIV, etc.) are nothing more than Roman Catholic perversions.
______________________________________

The corruptions in new versions, the history of the two conflicting streams of Bible manuscripts and the admission of scholars and critics alike that the reason new translations contradict the King James Bible in thousands of readings is simply because: New Versions Are Vatican Versions.

Dozens of documented quotes proving that new versions are Vatican versions, along with an answer to the ridiculous claim that, "The KJV is a Catholic version, too!" Also included are segments outlining the Vatican agenda to replace God's Bible with their own "Codex Vaticanus" as just one part of the Revelation 17 Whore's end game: complete global unification of all religions under Rome's headship.

Time is short and Jesus is coming SOON! http://www.kjvbiblebelievers.com





logos1560 said:
Can you prove more Roman Catholic influence on the NIV that could be shown to be on the KJV according to the use of consistent, just measures?
Click to expand...


The Roman Catholic Influence Behind The Modern Bible Versions by Dr. Douglas D. Stauffer


logos1560 said:
Would you skip over the fact that there was a Jesuit who contributed renderings to the KJV through the KJV borrowing several of his renderings from the 1582 Roman Catholic Rheims New Testament?
Click to expand...


Where is your proof of that?

logos1560 said:
The Church of England doctrinal views of the makers of the KJV were more in agreement with Roman Catholic doctrinal views than the doctrinal views of the translators of the NIV would be.
Click to expand...


Again, where is your proof?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top