Psalm 12 and KJVO misuse

[FSSL]

Really? I don't focus on "exposing" modern versions. See my materials.

A quick search on your site

MODERN VERSIONS: SPAWN OF INFIDEL IDEOLOGY
http://www.bibleprotector.com/blog/?p=104

MODERN VERSIONISM: THE SLIPPERY SLOPE
http://www.bibleprotector.com/blog/?p=100

 

[Steven Avery]

A quick search on your site
MODERN VERSIONS: SPAWN OF INFIDEL IDEOLOGY
http://www.bibleprotector.com/blog/?p=104
MODERN VERSIONISM: THE SLIPPERY SLOPE
http://www.bibleprotector.com/blog/?p=100

Which simply proves Matthew's point. Two short summary articles that look at the basic conceptual issues. One verse example given.

None of the detail and huge efforts documenting corruptions that we see from some AV defenders.  (e.g. the excellent Magic Marker page of Brandon Staggs.)  None of the long articles talking of the specific faults of new editions.

Steven Avery

 

[FSSL]

Your parsing is really amusing.

 

[prophet]

To me, the purification process prophecy postulated petulantly by Petey is painting a picture of Scripture (and God) as powerless, or at least pretty weak.

 

[bibleprotector]

A quick search on your site

While I am glad you looked at my site, what you did not find is lengthy lists of comparisons to various renderings in modern versions.

 

[FSSL]

Again... why the parsing?

You are into "exposing" modern versions as infidel ideaology, corrupt, modernistic... The denial falls flat.

The fact that you don't catalogue lists of problems just means that your claims are pretty well unsubstantiated.

 

[bibleprotector]

Again... why the parsing?

Your agenda is to read in deception where none exists.

You are into "exposing" modern versions as infidel ideaology, corrupt, modernistic... The denial falls flat.

You've got it backwards. Modern versions are just one of a wide variety of fruits. The actual battle is between the wrong foundation and the authority of Scripture. Your wrong attachment to modern versions, wrong interpretation and so on is because of your wrong underlying presuppositions.

 

[FSSL]

The twisting... the noise of many words.

Now the KJVOs want to reject the idea that they expose the modern versions. This is insanity!!!

 

[bibleprotector]

The twisting... the noise of many words.

Now the KJVOs want to reject the idea that they expose the modern versions. This is insanity!!!

Spending time going through hundreds of thousands of problems with modern versions is not the battleground: the battle between the Word and Spirit view and the leaven of Infidelity is. The incorrect foundations of your approach is what needs to be addressed, not merely fact that you use the ESV that has all kinds of issues. Therefore I am not focussed on "exposing the modern versions", but focussed on the "don't be lukewarm" view (where lukewarm = various shades of Christianity + some degree of Infidelity). That's why I am not focussed upon addressing Calvinism, or battles about eschatology, but more importantly, on the raising up of better understanding of the Word and Spirit.

Small "m" modernism really is an ideology, or which modern versions are but a mere part. Much more telling is where the stand is on a whole swag of issues, and why: the why is actually the dichotomy among Christians between carnal brethren and hot brethren.

 

[prophet]

The twisting... the noise of many words.

Now the KJVOs want to reject the idea that they expose the modern versions. This is insanity!!!

Spending time going through hundreds of thousands of problems with modern versions is not the battleground: the battle between the Word and Spirit view and the leaven of Infidelity is. The incorrect foundations of your approach is what needs to be addressed, not merely fact that you use the ESV that has all kinds of issues. Therefore I am not focussed on "exposing the modern versions", but focussed on the "don't be lukewarm" view (where lukewarm = various shades of Christianity + some degree of Infidelity). That's why I am not focussed upon addressing Calvinism, or battles about eschatology, but more importantly, on the raising up of better understanding of the Word and Spirit.

Small "m" modernism really is an ideology, or which modern versions are but a mere part. Much more telling is where the stand is on a whole swag of issues, and why: the why is actually the dichotomy among Christians between carnal brethren and hot brethren.

Don't forget the battle between functionally illiterate brethren, and those who can read comprehensively.

 

[Steven Avery]

The fact that you don't catalogue lists of problems just means that your claims are pretty well unsubstantiated.

FSSL is a master at worthless lose-lose argumentation. 

Others have pages of such catalogs.  If Bibleprotector did similar work FSSL would use that as an argument against a supposed obsession with the 100s of modern version editions.

The twisting... the noise of many words. Now the KJVOs want to reject the idea that they expose the modern versions. This is insanity!!!

Here FSSL continues the lose-lose modern versions unto absurdity.  Simply because Matthew (and myself) say we do not spend time on the minutiae of individual modern version edition errors, he makes a bogus claim that we reject exposing their errors.

Steven

 

[FSSL]

Really? I don't focus on "exposing" modern versions. See my materials.

I love this quote! It has produced two more pages of absurd nonsense.

 

[FSSL]

... That's why I am not focussed upon addressing Calvinism...

I think BP just wants another link to an article on his website...

REFUTING THE CALVINIST VIEW OF SCRIPTURE IN TRANSLATION
16/08/2014 BIBLEPROTECTOR

http://www.bibleprotector.com/blog/?p=81

 

[bibleprotector]

I think BP just wants another link to an article on his website...

Rare mentions of "Calvinism" are not to be considered focus.

This booklet describes my focus: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6XF8984ar9NUkRTdWR3MUVkX1k/view

 

[bgwilkinson]

Yep, there he goes with another link.

lol 

How predictable. More of the same old stuff.

 

[FSSL]

To me, the purification process prophecy postulated petulantly by Petey is painting a picture of Scripture (and God) as powerless, or at least pretty weak.

8)

Don't sit in the front pew when prophet preaches. There are enough "p's" in that post to cause a flash flood!

 

[prophet]

To me, the purification process prophecy postulated petulantly by Petey is painting a picture of Scripture (and God) as powerless, or at least pretty weak.

8)

Don't sit in the front pew when prophet preaches. There are enough "p's" in that post to cause a flash flood!

Preposterous!

 

[subllibrm]

To me, the purification process prophecy postulated petulantly by Petey is painting a picture of Scripture (and God) as powerless, or at least pretty weak.

8)

Don't sit in the front pew when prophet preaches. There are enough "p's" in that post to cause a flash flood!

Preposterous!

Pshaw!!

 

[prophet]

To me, the purification process prophecy postulated petulantly by Petey is painting a picture of Scripture (and God) as powerless, or at least pretty weak.

8)

Don't sit in the front pew when prophet preaches. There are enough "p's" in that post to cause a flash flood!

Preposterous!

Pshaw!!

Poppycock

 

[Ransom]

I highlighted quotes from the Protestant commentators which indicated reference to God's Word.

And I highlighted quotes from them showing that you had distorted their arguments.

You cannot be a KJV-onlyist without at the same time being dishonest.