- Joined
- Jan 29, 2013
- Messages
- 8,018
- Reaction score
- 57
- Points
- 48
Jesus’ resurrection is the staple of Christianity and its doctrines. Having been a devout Christian for 5 decades, I certainly understand its importance to the Christian faith. Without a literal bodily resurrection, there is no biblical inerrancy and no salvation (I Cor. 15).
Personally, I no longer find certainty of the resurrection (Sorry Lee Stroebel – I LOVED your books back in the day). However, I have reclaimed its importance whether or not Jesus’ resurrection was a literal event.
Jesus spoke over and over supporting non-violent resistance against empire: the empire of both religion and government (in empire they are joined at the hip). Turning the other cheek, the giving of both coat and tunic, the travel of an extra mile, the irritancy of the mustard seed, the parable of the hidden talent, etc. all had significance about empire, exposure of its power yet peaceful resistance against it.
The ultimate was Jesus’ crucifixion. Rome saw him as a threat with the following he garnered on his donkey-ride to Jerusalem. His disciples saw him as a conqueror as there were at least 3 religious zealots within his crew (Simon, Judas and Peter) who sought Jesus to violently overthrow the Roman government.
When the religious and governmental powers united in viewing Jesus as an existential threat, they used him as a political-religious scapegoat: an example to squash any attempt to overthrow their power structures, their empire. They believed his death meant their continued oppressive powers.
Jesus death was to have cleared the threat. However, the resurrection is about new life and renewed love. His death cleared the stage and the spirit of love eventually became the tool of resistance: the acceptance and ministry to those who are victims of empire. This was exemplified at Pentecost – the (comm)unity of foreigners without colonization and the social altruism which met the needs of all – those who were impoverished at the hands of empire.
So for me, it matters not whether Jesus experienced a bodily resurrection. I won't argue either for or against it because it is irrelevant to me. What does matter is the lesson it teaches, offering the peaceful resistance against the powers of religion and government by accepting and helping those the empire oppresses.
Personally, I no longer find certainty of the resurrection (Sorry Lee Stroebel – I LOVED your books back in the day). However, I have reclaimed its importance whether or not Jesus’ resurrection was a literal event.
Jesus spoke over and over supporting non-violent resistance against empire: the empire of both religion and government (in empire they are joined at the hip). Turning the other cheek, the giving of both coat and tunic, the travel of an extra mile, the irritancy of the mustard seed, the parable of the hidden talent, etc. all had significance about empire, exposure of its power yet peaceful resistance against it.
The ultimate was Jesus’ crucifixion. Rome saw him as a threat with the following he garnered on his donkey-ride to Jerusalem. His disciples saw him as a conqueror as there were at least 3 religious zealots within his crew (Simon, Judas and Peter) who sought Jesus to violently overthrow the Roman government.
When the religious and governmental powers united in viewing Jesus as an existential threat, they used him as a political-religious scapegoat: an example to squash any attempt to overthrow their power structures, their empire. They believed his death meant their continued oppressive powers.
Jesus death was to have cleared the threat. However, the resurrection is about new life and renewed love. His death cleared the stage and the spirit of love eventually became the tool of resistance: the acceptance and ministry to those who are victims of empire. This was exemplified at Pentecost – the (comm)unity of foreigners without colonization and the social altruism which met the needs of all – those who were impoverished at the hands of empire.
So for me, it matters not whether Jesus experienced a bodily resurrection. I won't argue either for or against it because it is irrelevant to me. What does matter is the lesson it teaches, offering the peaceful resistance against the powers of religion and government by accepting and helping those the empire oppresses.