Ed Stetzer (SBC missiologist guru) throws Schaap under the bus.

[quote author=Tarheel Baptist]Now, what does he think about the same in the SBC, Jakes, the Elephant Room, Furtick......[/quote]

You have evidence of Jakes, the Elephant Room guys, or Furtick (btw: who is one of the Elephant Room guys) molesting children?
 
rsc2a said:
[quote author=Tarheel Baptist]Now, what does he think about the same in the SBC, Jakes, the Elephant Room, Furtick......
Click to expand...

You have evidence of Jakes, the Elephant Room guys, or Furtick (btw: who is one of the Elephant Room guys) molesting children?
[/quote]

r2d2, clueless on the FFF!
You left out in your edit of my quote....SBC....which has more than their share of immorality among their 'clergy'.
My point on the Elephant Room, Furtick/Jakes controversy, was that he doesn't take a public position on even less substantive issues!

Duuuuuuuuuuh!
 
Tarheel Baptist said:
rsc2a said:
[quote author=Tarheel Baptist]Now, what does he think about the same in the SBC, Jakes, the Elephant Room, Furtick......
Click to expand...

You have evidence of Jakes, the Elephant Room guys, or Furtick (btw: who is one of the Elephant Room guys) molesting children?
Click to expand...

r2d2, clueless on the FFF!
You left out in your edit of my quote....SBC....which has more than their share of immorality among their 'clergy'.
My point on the Elephant Room, Furtick/Jakes controversy, was that he doesn't take a public position on even less substantive issues!

Duuuuuuuuuuh![/quote]

So your point had nothing to do with what you wrote or quote. Gotcha.
 
rsc2a said:
Tarheel Baptist said:
rsc2a said:
[quote author=Tarheel Baptist]Now, what does he think about the same in the SBC, Jakes, the Elephant Room, Furtick......
Click to expand...

You have evidence of Jakes, the Elephant Room guys, or Furtick (btw: who is one of the Elephant Room guys) molesting children?
Click to expand...

r2d2, clueless on the FFF!
You left out in your edit of my quote....SBC....which has more than their share of immorality among their 'clergy'.
My point on the Elephant Room, Furtick/Jakes controversy, was that he doesn't take a public position on even less substantive issues!

Duuuuuuuuuuh!
Click to expand...

So your point had nothing to do with what you wrote or quote. Gotcha.
[/quote]

My point had nothing to do with your lack of understanding of what I wrote....as I've said before, you are either dinisgenuious or dumb!
 
Apparently....I really do think you need to work on being more clear when it comes to how you write because (at least in written form), your communication skills need a lot of improvement.

Aside (and case in point?): Why would Stetzer not making a public position on less substantive issues be a cause for concern?
 
rsc2a said:
Apparently....I really do think you need to work on being more clear when it comes to how you write because (at least in written form), your communication skills need a lot of improvement.

Aside (and case in point?): Why would Stetzer not making a public position on less substantive issues be a cause for concern?
Click to expand...


Perhaps you're correct.
Or it could be you read into my posts what you want hem to say.
Either way, I'll try to keep my posts directed to you on a 6th grade level.....eh so a 6th grader can understand what I say!  ;D

And it isn't a cause for concern it just points out that he picks and chooses who he disagrees with in public. His friends will all agree with him on Schaap, but they might be offended if he criticized them or their actions....that means the things they did!
 
Tarheel Baptist said:
rsc2a said:
Apparently....I really do think you need to work on being more clear when it comes to how you write because (at least in written form), your communication skills need a lot of improvement.

Aside (and case in point?): Why would Stetzer not making a public position on less substantive issues be a cause for concern?
Click to expand...


Perhaps you're correct.
Or it could be you read into my posts what you want hem to say.
Either way, I'll try to keep my posts directed to you on a 6th grade level.....eh so a 6th grader can understand what I say!  ;D
Click to expand...

You quoted the Stetzer tweet (a tweet about Shaap's sexual misconduct) then asked why he ignored the beam in his own camp's eye to comment on this? You then tied "his camp" to "SBC, Jakes, the Elephant Room, Furtick....". In fact, let's look at the quote:

Ed settler is a leader in a movement that has lately been filled with some controversy and controversial situations.....and he could actually influence some of those.
Instead, he speaks out on an obscure IFB situation......because everyone in his peer group will agree....it was a safe move for him.

Now, what does he think about the same in the SBC, Jakes, the Elephant Room, Furtick......
Click to expand...

So you were talking about "an obscure IFB situation" (i.e. Shaap's sexual misconduct) then asked "what does he think about the same in the SBC, Jakes, the Elephant Room, Furtick..."

So, whether you meant to or not, you were accusing these guys of sexual misconduct. Thus the reason for my question.

[quote author=Tarheel Baptist]And it isn't a cause for concern it just points out that he picks and chooses who he disagrees with in public. His friends will all agree with him on Schaap, but they might be offended if he criticized them or their actions....that means the things they did![/quote]

He also doesn't comment on his favorite type of cereal, which kind of pie he likes most, or what color pants he prefers to wear. So again:

Why would Stetzer not making a public position on less substantive issues be a cause for concern?

Wait...you just said it isn't a cause for concern. But earlier it was a cause for concern?
 
rsc2a said:
He also doesn't comment on his favorite type of cereal, which kind of pie he likes most, or what color pants he prefers to wear.
Click to expand...

Trader Joe's organic mango passion granola, key lime, black.  :-*

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top