Vince Massi said:Thank you, 16KJV11. I am a great admirer of John R. Rice and consider his book "Prayer: Asking and Receiving" to be one of the greatest books ever written. I am convinced that all of these men witnessed faithfully to others. But there is a problem with "Easy Believism," the doctrine that if you say the words "Jesús, please save me," and mean it, you are saved. There is no need for repentance, and no need for evidence of a new birth afterwards.
I'm afraid that all of these men believed in easy Believism, and many of their professions were not genuine. Billy Graham, Incidentally, was the king of easy believers, and it's a good thing that I was a Catholic, or I would not have known that I was going to Hell.
This statement was made in another thread and I thought it deserved its own. When I read statements like the above, it usually means the statement is supported by an opinion rather than the Scriptures.
Example: "But there is a problem with "Easy Believism," the doctrine that if you say the words "Jesus, please save me," and mean it, you are saved."
So according to Mr. Massi, it is impossible for a person that utters these words, while meaning it, to be saved. At least that is what it appears he means. Is he right or wrong?
First, Mr. Massi implies that a person who says the phrase, ""Jesus, please save me" and means it, is not saved because he did not repent! I would argue than ANYONE who means "Jesus, please save me" HAS repented! Did the Philippian jailer "repent"? Did the Eunich "repent"?
(For the sake of this discussion, the phrase "means it" will be defined as out of the heart, and with all serious intentions)
Then, Mr. Massi appears to add another "qualifier" to prove of ones salvation. And that is his phrase that "Easy Believism" has "no need for evidence of a new birth afterwards".
What say ye?