i am fully aware demonic activity can cause the very same things...
I'm glad that you acknowledge that.
but in my case i am also 100% certain that it;s not the case..... . and i know that for 2 reasons.....
1... i am saved.... bought by the blood of Jesus... saved by the grace of God through faith in Christ..... i was saved at age 8 and have never doubted it once.... i never stopped praying from that moment either... .. i;ve been rebellious and did foolish things a few times but never doubted my salvation....
I'm glad for that, too.
2... a saved person cannot be demon possessed..... we are bought and paid for by God and God does not share ownership of his children with any other entitiy... especially not an evil one.........
While I agree that a child of God cannot be possessed, I would caution you to not be too presumptuous about the Devil's boundaries concerning Christians. Jesus taught us to pray that we not be led into [the] temptation [of the evil one], but to be delivered from [the] evil [one].
Jesus was led by the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted of the Devil.
The Children of the Israel were led into the wilderness to be tempted by fiery serpents and scorpions and drought.
Hymenaeus and Alexander were delivered unto Satan, to learn to stop blaspheming.
Now don't get your dander up. I'm not saying this is your situation. I'm just saying there is a difference between oppression and torment and possession, and the boundary lines between the Devil and Christians may not be drawn as far back as one might suppose.
however.... things like sleep paralysis and waking dreams can also happen due to severe fatigue and sleep deprivation... short term emotional psychological traumas that don;t result in a permanent brain anomally ....many different things in people who are not schizophrenic and not demon possessed...... even with all our technology and research the human brain is the part of the body we know the least about.... it;s easier to map the floor of the ocean that it is to figure out the brain....
I think you're confusing the brain with the mind in your comment about mapping. The human brain has been fully mapped, including its genetics. All motor control and sensory processing centers are known. If one presumes that conciousness, and thought, personality, and identity are also functions of the brain, which is the defacto presupposition with a majority of psychiatrists and other physicians, then of course the brain would be seemingly unfathomable.
The brain is not unfathomable, but the mind is, and the connection between the two is a mystery, as the neurologists I've cited testify, and there is now empiracle evidence of the mind's immaterial nature.
I'm not denying that brain damage and other kinds of trauma can have profound effects on one's mental health, I'm simply cautioning against giving those things more credit than they deserve, and at the expense of the Gospel. The Devil can't be blamed for everything, but neither can brain damage.
as far as people such as the girl you mentioned born with a brain anomally or most of it missing...but able to live normal lives
Whom I mentioned simply as an example of the immaterial nature of the mind, and how, in this case, the mind is unhampered by a severely malformed and practically non-existent brain. The girl is an exception, and I don't think her environment has any explanatory power for the phenomenon.
my new sister from the family that took me in was inspired to study psychology eventually earning her phd in it because of me and a desire to learn how to help me.... ...for many years on the fff i posted accounts of my past experiences and told in limited detail how i was abused..... it actually helped me in a way to do that and i continued because people on the forum told me it helped them to understand others like me........ .. but i don;t do that much anymore because most of those people are not here anymore and the current generation of fundamentalists occupying the forum tend to be more judgmental than they are understanding or even forgiving......
I have great respect for the medical sciences, including psychiatry. I have a deep admiration for those who work to offer some kind of relief for those who are afflicted. It can't be denied that honest observation and exploration of the human psyche will yield keen insights into human behavior and the nature of the human mind. Jordan Peterson is one example. I listened to his seminar on Exodus, not for the theology, but for the psychology. I was enthralled by the parallels he drew between the observations of those in his discipline and of the biblical histories and the revelations in the law.
It also can't be denied that one's world view will determine one's interpretations of his observations and prescribe his treatments. I think the stories of shock therapies and lobotomies from the not too distant past should be ample warning to anyone to be wary of the degree of help to be found in those whose hearts may be in the right place, but who are bound by their Materialistic presuppositions.
Now, about what I meant about leaning on Naturalism at the "expense of the Gospel." There is much that we're told about the human condition and the remedy thereof in the Scriptures. Were there human traffickers in the First Century? Was there child sexual abuse? Was there wife beating and murder? Were there horrors of war and torture and trauma. Were there children who witnessed such things?
Is there any level of victimization that can be inflicted today that didn't happen everywhere and in every age? Of course not.
Was the church equipped to minister to such? Is she equipped to minister to them today?
Why wouldn't she be?
The people of the first century didn't ignorantly and superstitiously ascribe every mental torment to a devil. If there's any difference in the afflictions of this century and the first one, it's that demonic activity is much more subdued. The Devil is bound. He can't deceive the nations and impede the spread of the Gospel, yet the
mystery of inquity doth already work, and
there are many antichrists. Not only was demonic activity much more overt and widespread in the first century, by and large no one was a Materialist. I think these two factors made people of the first century, as a general rule, more keen in their discernments, not less. Regardless of the nature thereof, when it came to torments of the mind, the church and the doctrines of Christ were the source of healing.
By contrast, I think the defacto Materialism in the mental health profession today is an impedance to their understanding. It's an impedance to any discipline, really, because it's a fallacious world view. How can anyone suggest an immaterial cause, if the immaterial doesn't exist?
but this subject is far too complicated to go into and explain in detail here...
Agreed.