Andrew Sluder Agrees with Tom Brennan

[Twisted]

And, of course, the fff! ?

Where would we be without the FFF?

we would have probably had nation wide revival and ushered in the millennial reign of Christ  !! jk lol

Steven Anderson is taking care of all that.

 

[Tarheel Baptist]

Call me shallow, but I could not watch this for more than a few seconds.

SEVAS SUSEJ

UGGH!

You are indeed shallow.
You must IMMEDIATELY mail in your rock ribbed fundamentalist credentials to either Saluder/salter, Bob Gray, Steve Anderson or Tom Brennan.

 

[Walt]

He says he thought it was settled 35 years ago that IFBs would be King James Only.  I don't think it was settled back in the 1950s, when fundamental Baptists were quoting from the ASV, and about that time John R. Rice put out his "Sermon From A Catholic Bible."  We must have already been in Laodicea back then.

Sure hope I don't get "lamblasted" for these remarks.

John R Rice is not the authority... having said that, it wasn't as big of a deal then -- now we have a multitude of versions all casting doubt on the KJV.

 

[Walt]

When Bill G rady is the standard he follows, like this guy thinks, there is a pedestal problem.

I say, take the whole world but give me Jesus.

Amen!

 

[Walt]

According to Sluder, you "sissies" on here won't like this.  And no, he doesn't mention Tom.  Probably never heard of him, like you've never heard of Sluder.

The main point I liked is he points out that the liberal direction of churches is and will affect the youth.

I've never heard of this guy.

He fails to understand that the problem is the IB "movement" - they were so used to being small and an underdog that they had a habit of never criticizing other IB churches.  However, when any teacher (IB or not) goes against what you believe, it is right to call them out by name and warn people.

I have no idea who he is speaking of - I wish he'd name names.

It would be nice if he would say what "liberal" is, in his mind.

Many preachers don't want to take the vitriol from calling out names - their worshippers come out in droves.

This guy seemed more concerned about people not using the KJV than using contemporary music.

I don't like his reference to Hyles; I think Hyles did far more harm than help to IFB churches.  Bill Grady is another one I'm not too sure about -- at least one of his books was way-out conspiracy waco.

Toward the end he discussed CCM.

Ruckman is another problem guy; he seems to like him, too.  He may have made a good points, but I don't like the men he quotes.

 

[Walt]

I don't like it when IFB preachers try to order other IFBs around and tell them what to do, which does happen sometimes.  But I don't object to Andrew Sluder or anyone else just putting out a video and expressing his opinion and getting things off his chest.  I don't see that as a violation of the principle of the autonomy and independency of the local church.  Sluder has a right to issue his criticisms, and the rest of us have a right to ignore him or criticize him right back.  I agree with Sluder that no IFB preacher or church is above criticism.  Speaking only for myself, I was totally unimpressed with his obsession with KJV only, dress standards, "dispensational truth," Jack Hyles, Bill Grady and Ruckman.  Those who think that type of message is what we really need in this so-called "Laodicean Age" can enroll in his Asheville Baptist Institute in North Carolina.  But why bother, since Sluder seems to believe we are doomed to go into apostasy anyway.

Well said! I don't remember much about dress standards, but he seemed to really hit on the KJV again and again.