A 'rebuke' to readers of stuff fundies like.

[Tarheel Baptist]

http://ryan-hayden.com/a-rebuke-to-the-readers-of-stuff-fundies-like/

 

[rsc2a]

I'm a bit unclear...is he judging the quality of the website by the quality of the commentators?

 

[Tarheel Baptist]

I'm a bit unclear...is he judging the quality of the website by the quality of the commentators?

Yes.

 

[rsc2a]

I'm a bit unclear...is he judging the quality of the website by the quality of the commentators?

Yes.

That's pretty terrible criteria to use to judge a website.

 

[Tarheel Baptist]

I'm a bit unclear...is he judging the quality of the website by the quality of the commentators?

Yes.

That's pretty terrible criteria to use to judge a website.

You believe stuff fundies like is being unjustly judged?

Oh! The irony!

 

[rsc2a]

I'm a bit unclear...is he judging the quality of the website by the quality of the commentators?

Yes.

That's pretty terrible criteria to use to judge a website.

You believe stuff fundies like is being unjustly judged?

Oh! The irony!

I didn't say either way. I made an overall statement that judging a website by the quality of the commentators is stupid.

 

[Tarheel Baptist]

I'm a bit unclear...is he judging the quality of the website by the quality of the commentators?

Yes.

That's pretty terrible criteria to use to judge a website.

You believe stuff fundies like is being unjustly judged?

Oh! The irony!

I didn't say either way. I made an overall statement that judging a website by the quality of the commentators is stupid.

I didn't either....but Oh! The irony!

 

[rsc2a]

[quote author=rsc2a]I didn't say either way. I made an overall statement that judging a website by the quality of the commentators is stupid.

I didn't either....but Oh! The irony![/quote]

So the article (not the comments) was an attempt to judge a website by its commentators. Yes..I can say the article is stupid then if that is the intention of the author.

 

[Tarheel Baptist]

[quote author=rsc2a]I didn't say either way. I made an overall statement that judging a website by the quality of the commentators is stupid.

I didn't either....but Oh! The irony!

So the article (not the comments) was an attempt to judge a website by its commentators. Yes..I can say the article is stupid then if that is the intention of the author.
[/quote]

I think some other things are stupid...but it's just my opinion!

 

[subllibrm]

SFL can be pretty mean spirited.

 

[Tarheel Baptist]

SFL can be pretty mean spirited.

Not to mention intellectually dishonest at times.
Which was the point of the young mans blog, I think!

 

[subllibrm]

SFL can be pretty mean spirited.

Not to mention intellectually dishonest at times.
Which was the point of the young mans blog, I think!

I'm not even a fundy and I won't read their page. It is just so unChrist like.

 

[rsc2a]

SFL can be pretty mean spirited.

Not to mention intellectually dishonest at times.
Which was the point of the young mans blog, I think!

I thought you said the point was that the commentators were mean?

 

[Tarheel Baptist]

SFL can be pretty mean spirited.

Not to mention intellectually dishonest at times.
Which was the point of the young mans blog, I think!

I thought you said the point was that the commentators were mean?

There's part of YOUR problem.... ;D

 

[Evelyn]

SFL can be pretty mean spirited.

Not to mention intellectually dishonest at times.
Which was the point of the young mans blog, I think!

I thought you said the point was that the commentators were mean?

There's part of YOUR problem.... ;D

Are you drinking today or something? lol  Here's what you wrote in the initial discourse:

I'm a bit unclear...is he judging the quality of the website by the quality of the commentators?

Yes.

I feel like Alice in Wonderland in this conversation.  lol

 

[Tarheel Baptist]

SFL can be pretty mean spirited.

Not to mention intellectually dishonest at times.
Which was the point of the young mans blog, I think!

I thought you said the point was that the commentators were mean?

There's part of YOUR problem.... ;D

Are you drinking today or something? lol  Here's what you wrote in the initial discourse:

I'm a bit unclear...is he judging the quality of the website by the quality of the commentators?

Yes.

I feel like Alice in Wonderland in this conversation.  lol

rsc2a is purposely dense...obtuse...so in dialogue with him I play his game.

 

[Mathew Ward]

SFL can be pretty mean spirited.

Not to mention intellectually dishonest at times.
Which was the point of the young mans blog, I think!

Which could also be said of the triple F, at times.

 

[FreeToBeMe]

Which could also be said of the triple F, at times.

You don't seem to understand.  It's perfectly fine for some Baptists
to be mean spirited and dishonestly portray others, but it's not OK for anyone outside their circle of influence to criticize or be mean to them.

 

[lnf]

I have never gone to Stuff Fundies Like, so I won't speak to what is there.  But I did follow the link to see what the young pastor said.  Frankly, I didn't see anything objectionable in it.  The overall tone was to remind folks to "play nice". 

 

[rsc2a]

Actually, I'm not messing with TB's head. I'm asking him to consistently apply what he says instead of changing as the wind (or his personal belief) blows.

This thread is a simple example of how that inconsistency plays out in his posts. Of course, then he attacks people for pointing out that inconsistency, but that's just his MO, I think.