The Slippery Eels called KJVOs/TROs

[FSSL]

While Brandenburg calls himself a TRO, his position is a distinction without a difference when it comes to the KJVO position. Look at this particular exchange.

Notice how the KJVO cannot stay on point. They are unable to argue for their position effectively, so they must slip around the tough questions and failures on their point.

http://dbts.edu/blog/?p=2117

 

[Izdaari]

But I've heard some people say they're TRO who accept the NKJV as a valid translation. That's different than KJVO, in that at least some of them are ok with a decent modern English version.

 

[FSSL]

But I've heard some people say they're TRO who accept the NKJV as a valid translation. That's different than KJVO, in that at least some of them are ok with a decent modern English version.

Some... TROs are a mixed variety. However, as you can see, Kent is not one of those who allow for the NKJV.

Here is his position on the NKJV, in full: http://kentbrandenburg.blogspot.com/2009/10/whats-scoop-on-new-king-james-version.html

 

[T-Bone]

His own reply about the NKJV shows he is an irrational idiot with no real reason for rejecting it

 

[brianb]

The TR is just the basis for the KJV (and NKJV) New Testament. Very few who are KJV only ever say they are TR only because they know that.