The KJVO cannot be trusted with interpreting the KJV

[FSSL]

I cannot think of any sect that goes so far as to consistently, 99.999% of the time COMPLETELY MISS the meaning of God's Word! I have some commentaries written by secular writers who make no faith claims and even they are able to get the meaning of God's Word.

How is it that the KJVO community has been permeated by people who do not even know their Bibles?

On this forum alone, we have two recent threads dealing with the misuse of Scripture...

The prophet, assisted by BALAAM, denies that 1 Corinthians 6:9 has anything to do with homosexuality.
Enoma, a newby, wants us to believe that Psalm 119:157 is actually a personification of modern translations.

What a mess!

These guys need to get away from KJVOs so they can get into their KJV!

 

[prophet]

There is no 'kjvo community'.  If there was, I wouldn't join it.  You, on the other hand, claim to have to shed light on it with 'original languages' and 'better translations'...so have your opinion.

Anishinabe

 

[prophet]

There is no 'kjvo community'.  If there was, I wouldn't join it.

Right. You are the only one to believe the KJVO stuff. Great! Then it will go away when you pass on! >

You, on the other hand, claim to have to shed light on it with 'original languages' and 'better translations'...so have your opinion.

Anishinabe

Actually, I used only the KJV in these threads. I could go to the original languages. I know it would be unfair to you to use the original languages. 

That still didnt stop you from making false claims about the original language mss, did it?!

Get out of the KJVO propaganda and get into your Bible.

I'm  not KJVO, I made that clear.  There is no 'kjvo community'.  And what 'claims' I made, about the 'original manuscripts', is that you haven't seen the mss that the AV was translated from, they came from many languages, and this is documented fact. 
  The lie you tell:  'The TR from Erasmus is the parent body from which the AV was translated.
  Historical fact:  Though we have no extant copy of the parent body of mss, and the translators' notations were lost in a fire, we know from books written by the translators, that they more closely followed the Beza than the TR.  There is not one single Greek NT, in existence, that was translated into the Common English Authorized Version New Testament.
  When you can admit this, then we can discuss English Vs. English.
 

Anishinabe

 

[Ransom]

prophet said:

There is no 'kjvo community'.

LOL! That's what all KJV-onlyists want to believe. Not because it's objectively true, but because they set their own personal ignorance as the standard for believing anything. (Notice, for another example, how  the KJV-onlyists who know nothing of Greek are always the ones who most vocally dismiss studying it.)

Meanwhile, while they are denying there's any such thing as a "KJVO community," they're all using the same discredited arguments and enforcing a rigid conformity on the forums they control.

KJV-onlyists . . . nonconformists exactly like all the other nonconformists.

You gotta laugh.

 

[Ransom]

prophet said:

I'm  not KJVO, I made that clear.

I believe I've already asked you, since you claim not to be KJVO, to tell us what other English Bible translations are the infallible word of God in addition to the KJV.

Your silence on that question belies any claim not to be KJV-only.

 

[Enow]

I cannot think of any sect that goes so far as to consistently, 99.999% of the time COMPLETELY MISS the meaning of God's Word!

Like how the Holy Spirit cannot make these intercessions Himself without going against the scripture even in modern Bibles like 1 Timothy 2:5 in the man Christ Jesus being the only Mediator between God and man or the whole point of only the Son making the intercessions is because the Son is answering these prayers by Whom the Father is glorified in the Son for doing so?  John 14:13-14

That's the point for referencing the KJV to see what His words are supposed to say in Romans 8:26-27 in lining up with the rest of the scripture so He may help you to see that Romans 8:26-27 is not lining up with the rest of the scripture of 1 Timothy 2:5 & John 14:13-14 in whatever modern Bible you are using.  I leave that to God to cause the increase as only He can help you get past all of those prejudices to see the necessity of using the KJV for the Truth.

 

[bgwilkinson]

I do not have the amount of blind faith one needs to believe KJVO.

 

[prophet]

We were discussing 1Cor 6:9 and you said the mss were different.

I asked you to point out the difference. You either missed the post or ignored it.

There is no difference between any TR, Byz or NA text in our discussed passage.

Nevertheless, you ignore the context and have misunderstood the KJV.

And you're ignoring the fact that there is no proof that 1Cor.6:9 in the AV was translated from the TR, Byz, CT, or some Syrian obscure shard.  So it's a moot point, to look into the 'original languages' when trying to shed light on the AV text.  So we look to He it is which guides us into all truth.

Anishinabe

 

[FSSL]

And you're ignoring the fact that there is no proof that 1Cor.6:9 in the AV was translated from the TR, Byz, CT, or some Syrian obscure shard.  So it's a moot point, to look into the 'original languages' when trying to shed light on the AV text.  So we look to He it is which guides us into all truth.
Anishinabe

Then why did you try to support your argument by claiming that there was a difference in the mss? You said the mss were different. Now you claim you don't know which one was used in 1 Cor 6:9.

Since there is ZERO difference among ANY mss, your attempt to obscure the fact--that you have no clue as to what you are talking about--is NOT obscure.

I should just change the title of this thread to..."The KJVO cannot be trusted."

 

[prophet]

What I have claimed, all along, is the truth.  You haven't seen, and don't know what reading from which mss the AV translators were guided to by God (preservation), to translate 1Cor.6:9 into English from.
So, in that light, discussing the 'original language' is a moot point.
That fact is never going to change.


Anishinabe

 

[prophet]

Typical.  Avoid the point, call names, assume you're right, insert head in sand.

Anishinabe