The Creed of The Alexandrian Cult

Biblebeliever

Biblebeliever

New member
Elect
Joined
Jun 23, 2013
Messages
892
Reaction score
0
Points
0
THE CREED OF THE ALEXANDRIAN CULT
​


[size=12pt]by Pastor Peter S. Ruckman​
​

1. There is NO FINAL AUTHORITY but God.

2. Since God is a SPIRIT, there is NO FINAL AUTHORITY that can be seen, heard, read, felt or handled.

3. Since all books are MATERIAL, there is NO BOOK ON THIS EARTH THAT IS THE FINAL AND ABSOLUTE AUTHORITY on what is right and what is wrong; what constitutes TRUTH and what constitutes ERROR.

4. There WAS a series of writings one time which, IF they had all been put into a BOOK as soon as they were written the first time, WOULD HAVE constituted an infallible and final authority by which to judge truth and error.

5. However, this series of writings was LOST, and the God Who inspired them was UNABLE TO PRESERVE THEIR CONTENT through Bible-believing Christians at Antioch (Syria), where the first Bible teachers were (Acts 13:1), and where the first missionary trip originated (Acts 13:1-6), and where the word "CHRISTIAN" originated (Acts 11:26).

6. So, God chose to ALMOST preserve them through Gnostics and philosophers from Alexandria, Egypt, even though God called HIS SON OUT of Egypt (Mat. 2), JACOB OUT of Egypt (Gen. 49), ISRAEL OUT of Egypt (Exod. 15), and JOSEPH'S BONES OUT of Egypt (Exod. 13).

7. So, there are two streams of Bibles: the most accurate - though, of course, there is NO FINAL, ABSOLUTE AUTHORITY FOR DETERMINING TRUTH AND ERROR: it is a matter of "preference" - are the Egyptian translations from Alexandria, Egypt, which are "almost the originals," although NOT QUITE.

8. The most INACCURATE TRANSLATIONS were those that brought about the GERMAN REFORMATION (Luther, Zwingli, Boehler, Zinzendorf, Spener, etc.) and the worldwide MISSIONARY MOVEMENT of the English speaking people: the Bible that Sunday, Torrey, Moody, Finney, Spurgeon, Whitfield, Wesley, and Chapman used.

9. But we can "tolerate" these if those who believe in them will tolerate US. After all, since THERE IS NO ABSOLUTE AND FINAL AUTHORITY THAT ANYONE CAN READ, TEACH, PREACH, OR HANDLE, the whole thing is a matter of "PREFERENCE." You may prefer what you prefer, and we will prefer what WE prefer: let us live in peace, and if we cannot agree on anything or everything, let us all agree on one thing: THERE IS NO FINAL, ABSOLUTE, WRITTEN AUTHORITY OF GOD ANYWHERE ON THIS EARTH.

This is the creed of the Alexandrian Cult.
 
No good answers, so you retreat into cut-and-paste of Ruckman's clownery?
 
Ransom said:
No good answers, so you retreat into cut-and-paste of Ruckman's clownery?
Click to expand...

Another KJVo-er with heretical views on the Trinity...
 
Ransom said:
No good answers, so you retreat into cut-and-paste of Ruckman's clownery?
Click to expand...

Scott, let me once again ask you,  do you believe that the New American Standard Bible which you use is the perfect and inerrant word of God?

A simple yes or no response will do just fine.

And I'll get to your responses on the other thread a little later.
 
Biblebeliever said:
Scott, let me once again ask you,  do you believe that the New American Standard Bible which you use is the perfect and inerrant word of God?
Click to expand...

Good grief, are you obtuse. I've already said yes, and already told you a hundred times that this question was asked and answered.

If you have a point to make by posting Clown Ruckman's idiocy, tell us what it is. I'm not here to be given the third degree by KJV-only nuts.
 
Ruckman...one has to laugh...clearly he doesn't even believe his KJV, anyone here of the divorce and remarriage passages?
 
T-Bone said:
Maybe Ruckman ought to run for president...because clearly he was for it before he was against it!
Click to expand...

Anyone who thinks Peter Ruckman is a go-to authority for anything - be it theology OR ethics - needs his head examined.
 
Whatever credibility BB had just went up in smoke.  Anyone who attaches themselves to Ruckman and his crowd has no credibility on anything.  Most KJVOs I know laugh at him....and these are diehard KJVOs.
 
Ransom said:
Good grief, are you obtuse. I've already said yes, and already told you a hundred times that this question was asked and answered.
Click to expand...


Finally!! A straight forward answer! Now was that so hard??? Couldn't you just have done that at the very beginning without all the tap dancing??


After all, from the beginning, I repeatedly told you that your initial answer and response was vague and not specific.

Ransom said:
If you have a point to make
Click to expand...


My point is that the Alexandrian philosophy is satanic and of the Devil. Because it is a philosophy that attacks Absolute Final Written Authority.


Here is the corrupt fruit of the Alexandrian philosophy from Westcott and Hort (two heretics) and their heretical belief system.


1461784_573273466073098_448708097_n.jpg

 
Biblebeliever said:
Finally!! A straight forward answer! Now was that so hard???
Click to expand...

It was a lot easier, apparently, than getting it into your pointy little head that I've been saying that all along.

Sheesh.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top