- Joined
- Jun 23, 2013
- Messages
- 892
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
The Almost Bible
By Dr. Al Lacy
http://fundamentalbaptistsermons.net/Audio/LacyTheAlmostBible.mp3
By Dr. Al Lacy
http://fundamentalbaptistsermons.net/Audio/LacyTheAlmostBible.mp3
PappaBear said:"If thou be the Son of God" another slur against the deity of Christ like so many in the NIV.
Love Dr. Lacey.
It sounds like he believed Baptists were way back in the time of Christ, too, after listening to some of his message on "The Book" at FBCH.
Good man.
PappaBear said:"If thou be the Son of God" another slur against the deity of Christ like so many in the NIV.
Love Dr. Lacey.
It sounds like he believed Baptists were way back in the time of Christ, too, after listening to some of his message on "The Book" at FBCH.
Good man.
subllibrm said:What is his Doctorate in and where did he earn it?
T-Bone said:Dr. Al Lacy....bwhahaha
logos1560 said:In his 1991 book entitled Can I Trust My Bible, Al Lacy wrote:
"In this chapter, I am asking: CAN I TRUST MY BIBLE'S TRANSLATION? The answer is plain and simple. .. NOT IF YOUR BIBLE HAS ERRORS! If it has even ONE error, it is not the Word of TRUTH! You cannot trust it! Because I'll guarantee you ... if it has ONE error, it will have a whole lot more. How can you trust a 'Bible' that is not perfect? if there are imperfections ... WHO is to identify the imperfections?" (p. 99).
According to a consistent application of Al Lacy's own faulty reasoning, the pre-1611 English Bibles of which the KJV was a revision cannot be trusted and were not the word of Truth since they had some errors. Therefore, the KJV is based on imperfect, unreliable sources according to his claims.
According to a consistent application of Al Lacy's own faulty reasoning, the 1611 KJV cannot be trusted and is not the Word of TRUTH since it has errors and was not perfect. According to his own faulty reasoning [based on fallacies], the 1611 KJV is in effect also an "almost Bible."
Just write Westerns Al, it's what you're good at.T-Bone said:logos1560 said:In his 1991 book entitled Can I Trust My Bible, Al Lacy wrote:
"In this chapter, I am asking: CAN I TRUST MY BIBLE'S TRANSLATION? The answer is plain and simple. .. NOT IF YOUR BIBLE HAS ERRORS! If it has even ONE error, it is not the Word of TRUTH! You cannot trust it! Because I'll guarantee you ... if it has ONE error, it will have a whole lot more. How can you trust a 'Bible' that is not perfect? if there are imperfections ... WHO is to identify the imperfections?" (p. 99).
According to a consistent application of Al Lacy's own faulty reasoning, the pre-1611 English Bibles of which the KJV was a revision cannot be trusted and were not the word of Truth since they had some errors. Therefore, the KJV is based on imperfect, unreliable sources according to his claims.
According to a consistent application of Al Lacy's own faulty reasoning, the 1611 KJV cannot be trusted and is not the Word of TRUTH since it has errors and was not perfect. According to his own faulty reasoning [based on fallacies], the 1611 KJV is in effect also an "almost Bible."
Well if you are going to require consistent application and integrity for bozo's like Lacy, you must be a libtard! Right Ozzy?