Struggles Now faced by Pastors Concerning Homosexuality

biscuit1953

Well-known member
Elect
Joined
Apr 18, 2012
Messages
1,188
Reaction score
134
Points
63
http://chattanoogan.com/2012/7/2/229512/Church-Holds-Firm-To-View-On-Gays.aspx
This is about an article posted in the Chattanooga Times Free Press on June the 24th.  It shows what is taking place over much of the nation concerning changing standards (not man made standards) set forth in the scriptures.  It is quite lengthy but I believe it describes the current problems faced by many church pastors of just about all denominations.  I believe Red Bank Baptist church is part of the Southern Baptist Convention.
 
True Bible preaching churches will be a minority in the End Times. Many will fall to the pressure of this World. :-[
 
biscuit1953 said:
http://chattanoogan.com/2012/7/2/229512/Church-Holds-Firm-To-View-On-Gays.aspx
This is about an article posted in the Chattanooga Times Free Press on June the 24th.  It shows what is taking place over much of the nation concerning changing standards (not man made standards) set forth in the scriptures.  It is quite lengthy but I believe it describes the current problems faced by many church pastors of just about all denominations.  I believe Red Bank Baptist church is part of the Southern Baptist Convention.
I had not read the original article but it was found at the bottom of the link I gave.  Here are both links.

http://chattanoogan.com/2012/7/2/229512/Church-Holds-Firm-To-View-On-Gays.aspx

http://timesfreepress.com/news/2012/jun/24/a-sons-secret-brings-a-southern-baptist-minister/
 
Excellent articles. A couple of thoughts:
- we have such a weak generation of American Christianity. We think we are experiencing difficult times. Methinks we need to read Hebrews 11 a bit more.
- I say this cautiously, but how weak was this man's sense of doctrine, and approach to biblical interpretation that it could not take a contrary human experience, albeit a painful one!
- I have long maintained that what is basically mainstream American evangelicalism has been swallowed in the last 10=15 years by the whole contemporary philosophy. That is increasingly true of even conservative denominations such as the SBC, or associations such as the BBF. This philosophy is utterly pragmatic at its core and embraces worldliness as a core belief. While this generation of such churches are almost all theologically sound I don't think you will be able to say that about the next generation, and certainly not about the one after that. You can see inklings of that in Rob Bell and, specifically relating to a mushy approach to sodomy, by Andy Stanley. When your entire premise of church is growth at almost any cost and you build in people a refusal to embrace or even accept  unpopular preaching you are sowing the wind and you will reap the whirlwind. The pressure of either unsaved/carnal church members that fill your pews and finance your budgets to dumb down your public opposition to an increasingly popular social change movement (gay 'rights') only grows ...and so you come to 're-examine' your position, both personally and corporately. This extremely well-written article is simply the tip of the iceberg. A whole lot more of this will be done in the next 10-20 years. I realize I am extrapolating out some things, and broad-brushing a bit, but I think I'm right. The contemporary movement is not a song. It is an entire movement, and it is taking churches and preachers on a ride they haven't thought through very well, at least the long term consequences of it they haven't.
- I say this cautiously, but how weak was this man's sense of doctrine, and approach to biblical interpretation that it could not take a contrary human experience, albeit a painful one!
 
IMHO, Mr. Nevels did right to leave his church over the matter. It was an irreconcilable difference between them. That doesn't mean Dr. Steelman should change his position. Both seem to be sincere and acting from conscience, at least from what I can tell from the obviously opinionated editorial. But Nevels did wrong to stay unchurched for 17 years instead of finding another church more compatible with what he believed.

The editorial's apparent position that a person has no right to leave a church because he doesn't believe what they believe is ridiculous. Of course one may, and sometimes should. In which case, they should find another, one they can agree with on at least the important stuff. Being "married" to the Body of Christ is forever, but to a particular congregation or denomination, not so much.
 
Back
Top