Scriptures - Without all the KJVO bunk

[admin]

What it is not:
1) A consensus-approved collection of sacred writings
2) A new fresh miraculous work of God
3) Limited to a 400 year old Anglican translation.

What it is:
God's Word as found in the OT (1 Tim 4:13) and NT (2 Peter 3:16).

 

[Smellin Coffee]

Or they could be simply the Writings section of the Jewish canon as that culture would have access to.

http://standfordrives.wordpress.com/article/writings-section-of-original-bible-of-g6z6g2l2q6zj-26/

 

[Biblebeliever]

What it is not:
1) A consensus-approved collection of sacred writings
2) A new fresh miraculous work of God
3) Limited to a 400 year old Anglican translation.

What it is:
God's Word as found in the OT (1 Tim 4:13) and NT (2 Peter 3:16).

What you should keep in mind is that the Scriptures which Timothy had in his posession (2 Tim. 3:15) were not the original autographs. They were a copy of a copy. 

 

[prophet]

Oh, come on....this place is going to end up like "grounded grid's" version of the FFF is these imposter sock puppets are going to keep being allowed.

Mick is not Mick from the other FFF
The Real Baptist is not the Real Baptist from the other FFF
Daddy's Girl is not Daddy's Girl from the other FFF
etc, etc......

I, on the other hand, AM the original StandingTall.

What it is, is the pre-existent 2nd figure of the Godhead, now called Jesus, or 'The Bible'.



Anishinaabe

 

[prophet]

What it IS is given by inspiration...present perfect, or linneal.

Anishinaabe