So, some of the reason could be attributed to the areas response to the gospel. Some would say missions money should go where people respond. The amount of missionaries needed should be in proportion to the response as opposed to the population.
Germany, Australia, The UK, Canada, Sweden, Norway, The Netherlands, The USofA are "hard" fields.
The Philippines, much of Africa, Mexico and much of South America, "soft" or "fertile" fields.
The argument is , if I apply wisdom to missions, shouldn't I invest my money where the the Great Commission affects the largest volume of people? Invest everywhere, but more where the response is greater.
[/quote]
They need to train nationals an turn it over to them and move on.
[/quote]I agree, but it still doesn't change what I brought up.