Proud that two N.C. Dems voted to repeal Obamacare

  • Thread starter Thread starter jimmudcatgrant
  • Start date Start date
redgreen5 said:
jimmudcatgrant said:

LOL moron.

The word is "repeal". Not "appeal".

I changed it.  Thanks for the info.  I don't have a problem admitting that I am human and make mistakes.  Now when are you going to quit lying and admit that you said that Jimmah Carter's pic wasn't there, when it clearly was?  Your character shows loud and clear here.  I am not your judge, but I wouldn't want to stand before God with your testimony.  When you do, there will not be an appeal of the sentence.  I am quite sure I used the correct word there. BTW, your mention of bestiality only springs forth the depravity or your heart.  Your words will be used against you one day, and you will not be able to lie your way out then.
 
[quote author=jimmudcatgrant ]
I changed it.  Thanks for the info.  I don't have a problem admitting that I am human and make mistakes.  Now when are you going to quit lying and admit that you said that Jimmah Carter's pic wasn't there, when it clearly was? [/quote]

I already admitted that.    Reply #5 in the thread.
In your partisan haste, you either breezed over it and didn't notice, or you're now trying to continue slandering me.

Your character shows loud and clear here.  I am not your judge, but I wouldn't want to stand before God with your testimony.

Funny; I was thinking the same thing about you.

People like you are so funny: apparently you think that God condemns my behavior, while He excuses (or even agrees) with yours.
 
redgreen5 said:
[quote author=jimmudcatgrant ]
I changed it.  Thanks for the info.  I don't have a problem admitting that I am human and make mistakes.  Now when are you going to quit lying and admit that you said that Jimmah Carter's pic wasn't there, when it clearly was?

I already admitted that.    Reply #5 in the thread.
In your partisan haste, you either breezed over it and didn't notice, or you're now trying to continue slandering me.

Then why lie about it later in the posts following? BTW, slander is when someone speaks something against you.  You must have meant libel, since you are so worried about the right words.  Yes, I did miss post 5 because I don't read a lot of your posts that are line by line commentaries.  Shorten your posts and get to the point.  The name calling in every line is redundant.

Your character shows loud and clear here.  I am not your judge, but I wouldn't want to stand before God with your testimony.

Funny; I was thinking the same thing about you.
[/quote]

What I know about your words is what is the thing in question.  You accused another poster of bestiality, and that indeed indicates a reprobate mind. And, btw, libel.
 
[quote author=jimmudcatgrant]
What I know about your words is what is the thing in question.  [/quote]

Apparently not, since you missed what I said about Carter in Reply #5. 
Oops.

You accused another poster of bestiality, and that indeed indicates a reprobate mind. And, btw, libel.

Ah, now you're trying to practice law. 
What would you say of the things that have been said by others about me, hmm?
Oh, that's right:  only conservotards have a right to redress.

Hint#1: before you enter your world of make-believe and pretend to practice law, spend some time studying it first.
Hint#2: rhetorical hyperbole.

 
redgreen5 said:
[quote author=jimmudcatgrant]
What I know about your words is what is the thing in question. 

Apparently not, since you missed what I said about Carter in Reply #5. 
Oops.

You accused another poster of bestiality, and that indeed indicates a reprobate mind. And, btw, libel.

Ah, now you're trying to practice law. 
What would you say of the things that have been said by others about me, hmm?
Oh, that's right:  only conservotards have a right to redress.

Hint#1: before you enter your world of make-believe and pretend to practice law, spend some time studying it first.
Hint#2: rhetorical hyperbole.
[/quote]

Please, go for your redress and bring all your lies in to play.  I would love to see that.  You are your own worst enemy.  Way to backtrack on the name calling.  We will see what the only judges that matter think.
 
[quote author=jimmudcatgrant]
Please, go for your redress and bring all your lies in to play. [/quote]

Are you stupid as well as confused?

I wasn't the one who brought up libel; you were.
I wasn't the one who tried to drop a veiled hint about possible legal action; you were.





 
redgreen5 said:
[quote author=jimmudcatgrant]
Please, go for your redress and bring all your lies in to play.

Are you stupid as well as confused?

I wasn't the one who brought up libel; you were.
I wasn't the one who tried to drop a veiled hint about possible legal action; you were.
[/quote]

That's right, I did bring up libel:  to correct your ignorance of the word slander.  Sheesh.  New resolution:  ignore RG and TGL as they are of the same ilk.  Funny they both disappeared at the same time as well.  Oh well, probably husband and husband.  :-X
 
[quote author=jimmudcatgrant]That's right, I did bring up libel:[/quote]

Then we agree that your misreading of my response was stupid. Since I wasn't the one bringing up libel, why would I be the one insinuating some veiled threat of legal action?
Duh.

  to correct your ignorance of the word slander.  Sheesh.

Your ignorance, not mine:
Slander
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/slander

slan
 
jimmudcatgrant said:
redgreen5 said:
[quote author=jimmudcatgrant]
Please, go for your redress and bring all your lies in to play.

Are you stupid as well as confused?

I wasn't the one who brought up libel; you were.
I wasn't the one who tried to drop a veiled hint about possible legal action; you were.

That's right, I did bring up libel:  to correct your ignorance of the word slander.  Sheesh.  New resolution:  ignore RG and TGL as they are of the same ilk.  Funny they both disappeared at the same time as well.  Oh well, probably husband and husband.  :-X
[/quote]

Back to your OP (red green is a troll, Ignoramous him, her,it).....the two who voted to repeal did so with permission of the leadership....as cover for re election in their conservative leaning districts. That's just the way politics is played....to fool us....the great unwashed....and keep us in line!
 
Tarheel Baptist said:
jimmudcatgrant said:
redgreen5 said:
[quote author=jimmudcatgrant]
Please, go for your redress and bring all your lies in to play.

Are you stupid as well as confused?

I wasn't the one who brought up libel; you were.
I wasn't the one who tried to drop a veiled hint about possible legal action; you were.

That's right, I did bring up libel:  to correct your ignorance of the word slander.  Sheesh.  New resolution:  ignore RG and TGL as they are of the same ilk.  Funny they both disappeared at the same time as well.  Oh well, probably husband and husband.  :-X

Back to your OP (red green is a troll, Ignoramous him, her,it).....the two who voted to repeal did so with permission of the leadership....as cover for re election in their conservative leaning districts. That's just the way politics is played....to fool us....the great unwashed....and keep us in line!
[/quote]

Yup...everyone playing politics...we desperately need some statesmen....there is not a dime's worth of difference in the two parties when it comes to integrity and really caring about the people they were sent there to serve.
 
Back
Top