Al Mohler's op-ed. Harsh, but fair.
R. Albert Mohler Jr. | The life and legacy of Jimmy Carter
wng.org
Definitely harsh, not so sure about the fair part, especially considering this article was written by the president of the SBC, which Carter famously divorced himself from. Aside from the Camp David Accords, really nothing positive is mentioned.
I do agree with this quote:
“Already some are arguing that Carter was, counter to most previous judgments, an unappreciated success during his years in office. Historians will claim that the verdict on the Carter presidency remains unsettled. But the most important verdict on a presidency is made by voters, and they conclusively settled that argument in 1980.”
It is unequivocally true that we must judge a candidate based on the voice of the voters. After all, in this country, the law is ultimately The People, and our system of government is designed for even the Constitution to be flexible. But, historically, presidents are judged differently, hot, temporary voter passions aside.
The article mentions the moral failings of Nixon, which helped propel Carter to the White House, but the mess actually started with a corrupt vice president prior to Nixon’s fall, which was Spiro Agnew. Nixon just added to the hot mess. I was impressed with the fact that Mohler mentioned the fact that Carter took over a dumpster fire of an economy when he became president. Unfortunately, although Carter had made some positive strides economically, the inflation remained high, but I find most Americans are quick to criticize Carter for the economy, while failing to mention the state of the economy he inherited.