Obama refuses to release all his tax records

  • Thread starter Thread starter christundivided
  • Start date Start date
C

christundivided

Guest
Obama has refused to release all his tax records. He has only release tax returns back to 2000. If he was honest and sincere.... he should release all his tax records. All the way back to the first time he ever reported any income to the IRS. I'd say it would very interesting to see of "President" Obama has actually paid ALL his taxes.

Don't you agree? I bet a dope smoking, cocaine snorting... womanizer like Obama cheated on his early tax returns. I think the president should come clean... don't you?
 
christundivided said:
Obama has refused to release all his tax records. He has only release tax returns back to 2000. If he was honest and sincere.... he should release all his tax records. All the way back to the first time he ever reported any income to the IRS. I'd say it would very interesting to see of "President" Obama has actually paid ALL his taxes.

Don't you agree? I bet a dope smoking, cocaine snorting... womanizer like Obama cheated on his early tax returns. I think the president should come clean... don't you?
Click to expand...




He has his taxes hiding under his birth certificate.    ::)

 
christundivided said:
Obama has refused to release all his tax records. He has only release tax returns back to 2000. If he was honest and sincere.... he should release all his tax records. All the way back to the first time he ever reported any income to the IRS. I'd say it would very interesting to see of "President" Obama has actually paid ALL his taxes.

Don't you agree? I bet a dope smoking, cocaine snorting... womanizer like Obama cheated on his early tax returns. I think the president should come clean... don't you?
Click to expand...

You should know by now that those things are only required of the Republicans...you must be racist to make such a demand! :o ;)
 
T-Bone said:
christundivided said:
Obama has refused to release all his tax records. He has only release tax returns back to 2000. If he was honest and sincere.... he should release all his tax records. All the way back to the first time he ever reported any income to the IRS. I'd say it would very interesting to see of "President" Obama has actually paid ALL his taxes.

Don't you agree? I bet a dope smoking, cocaine snorting... womanizer like Obama cheated on his early tax returns. I think the president should come clean... don't you?
Click to expand...

You should know by now that those things are only required of the Republicans...you must be racist to make such a demand! :o ;)
Click to expand...





No he's not, I seen him eating burnt marshmallows.  :-\
 
As far as I know, Obama hasn't released ANYTHING, except a badly forged birth certificate and badly forged selective service card. 
 
[quote author=T-Bonehead]
You should know by now that those things are only required of the Republicans[/quote]

It's required of both.
Obama has complied.
Romney still refuses.  In addition, Romney is in violation of Massachusetts State Ethics Laws.
End of story.
 
Castor Muscular said:
As far as I know,
Click to expand...

Well, there's your problem. If we relied on just what you know, we'd be back in the stone age.

 
redgreen5 said:
[quote author=T-Bonehead]
You should know by now that those things are only required of the Republicans
Click to expand...

It's required of both.
Obama has complied.
Romney still refuses.  In addition, Romney is in violation of Massachusetts State Ethics Laws.
End of story.
[/quote]

Nope. Not a violation of Massachusetts State Ethics Laws.

When can we expect him to be charged with ethics violations turd?

You're such a moron. You cry "guilty guilty guilty" and no one is listening to you. You can't point to one legal/civil charge against Romney. NOT ONE.
 
[quote author= clueless and divided]

It's required of both.
Obama has complied.
Romney still refuses.  In addition, Romney is in violation of Massachusetts State Ethics Laws.
End of story.


Nope. Not a violation of Massachusetts State Ethics Laws. [/quote]

Wrong.  I showed you this twice yesterday; why do you think you can deny it?

Several U.S. Securities and Exchange documents from the late 1990s and 2000s depicted Romney as Sankaty's owner at the time, but when he ran for Massachusetts governor in 2001 and 2002, Romney did not list the company on annual disclosure forms required by the Massachusetts State Ethics Commission.

LOL


When can we expect him to be charged with ethics violations turd?
Click to expand...

Another item I provided you with yesterday, moron. Whatsmatter? can't read the really big words?

The ethics commission would not comment on the omissions. Boston College law professor R. Michael Cassidy, who was a member of the commission at the time, said that if Romney "owned this business before he signed his ethics disclosure, then he was obliged to report it." The state's disclosure rules also allow a $1,000 minimum threshold. A six-year statute of limitations covering Romney's ethics reports has since expired.


You're such a moron.
Click to expand...

Far smarter than you'll ever be, as I just demonstrated.  Now run along and play.

 
redgreen5 said:
Wrong.  I showed you this twice yesterday; why do you think you can deny it?

Several U.S. Securities and Exchange documents from the late 1990s and 2000s depicted Romney as Sankaty's owner at the time, but when he ran for Massachusetts governor in 2001 and 2002, Romney did not list the company on annual disclosure forms required by the Massachusetts State Ethics Commission.

LOL
Click to expand...

You have no idea of what you're talking about. You haven't SEEN anything. NOTHING. You're basing your information of what's being regurgitated by lying...Liberal Democrats.
Another item I provided you with yesterday, moron. Whatsmatter? can't read the really big words?

The ethics commission would not comment on the omissions. Boston College law professor R. Michael Cassidy, who was a member of the commission at the time, said that if Romney "owned this business before he signed his ethics disclosure, then he was obliged to report it." The state's disclosure rules also allow a $1,000 minimum threshold. A six-year statute of limitations covering Romney's ethics reports has since expired.
Click to expand...

I read it. That is why I asked you about it moron. There are no charges coming numbnut. Get it? ;)

Must really bother you a lot to know the statue of limitations ran out. Poor baby......

 
christundivided said:
redgreen5 said:
Wrong.  I showed you this twice yesterday; why do you think you can deny it?

Several U.S. Securities and Exchange documents from the late 1990s and 2000s depicted Romney as Sankaty's owner at the time, but when he ran for Massachusetts governor in 2001 and 2002, Romney did not list the company on annual disclosure forms required by the Massachusetts State Ethics Commission.

LOL
Click to expand...

You have no idea of what you're talking about.
Click to expand...

LOL I don't have to personally see it.
If you have any evidence that the Associated Press is wrong, then by all means present the evidence.

But waving your hands around in the air and trying to create distractions is a waste of time

I read it. That is why I asked you about it moron. There are no charges coming numbnut. Get it? ;)
Click to expand...

LOL nice try, crap-for-brains. But the lack of charges stems from the fact that the statute of limitations has expired.
It doesn't change the fact that Romney violated the disclosure rules.
 
redgreen5 said:
christundivided said:
redgreen5 said:
Wrong.  I showed you this twice yesterday; why do you think you can deny it?

Several U.S. Securities and Exchange documents from the late 1990s and 2000s depicted Romney as Sankaty's owner at the time, but when he ran for Massachusetts governor in 2001 and 2002, Romney did not list the company on annual disclosure forms required by the Massachusetts State Ethics Commission.

LOL
Click to expand...

You have no idea of what you're talking about.
Click to expand...

LOL I don't have to personally see it.
If you have any evidence that the Associated Press is wrong, then by all means present the evidence.

But waving your hands around in the air and trying to create distractions is a waste of time

I read it. That is why I asked you about it moron. There are no charges coming numbnut. Get it? ;)
Click to expand...

LOL nice try, crap-for-brains. But the lack of charges stems from the fact that the statute of limitations has expired.
It doesn't change the fact that Romney violated the disclosure rules.
Click to expand...

So says you and few others. All that adds to is one of those little white spots on the end of a bird turd. Do you know what that "white" spot is?

Its crap too... ;)

NO charges coming. Obama campaign not make accusations.... I'd say you're all alone on your little island.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top