Obama is for gay marriages

[4everfsu]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/05/09/obama-expected-to-discuss-gay-marriage-position/

 

[christundivided]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/05/09/obama-expected-to-discuss-gay-marriage-position/

I hope this sinks his chances.

I honestly believe he is lying. If you listen to how many times he is pausing and searching for words......Its a clear sign of a liar. Nothing new for him.

 

[T-Bone]

I guess there is no doubt now...our president has been given over to a reprobate mind!

 

[truthdetector]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/05/09/obama-expected-to-discuss-gay-marriage-position/

I hope this sinks his chances.

I honestly believe he is lying. If you listen to how many times he is pausing and searching for words......Its a clear sign of a liar. Nothing new for him.

No surprise here.  I think he honestly supports gay marriage, but he is fearful of the consequences on his re-election.  Given the spiritual condition of our country, I don't think he will lose very many supporters over his position.  Hopefully, it will get more Christians to the polls.

 

[HeDied4U]

The only thing surprising about this announcement is the fact that he took so long to admit it.

Oh well, just one more in a very long list of reasons to vote this nitwit out of office come November.

 

[Izdaari]

Well, good for him!  8)

But he still doesn't get my vote.

 

[Reformed Guy]

I guess there is no doubt now...our president has been given over to a reprobate mind!

I fear that he isn't leading so much here as following the will of a depraved electorate.

Either way, we're ripe for judgment.

 

[Reformed Guy]

Well, good for him!  8)

No it isn't good for him and it isn't good for us.  It's an ABOMINATION.  Does that word mean anything at all to you-- expect something to applaud?

 

[Ransom]

Obama is for gay marriages

What's his opinion on square triangles and married bachelors?

 

[Izdaari]

Well, good for him!  8)

No it isn't good for him and it isn't good for us.  It's an ABOMINATION.  Does that word mean anything at all to you-- expect something to applaud?

Yeah, abomination does mean something to me. It's an English word that has no exact equivalent in Hebrew. One of several Hebrew words often translated as "abomination" most often means "ritually unclean", requiring the appropriate Jewish cleansing rituals before one is able to participate in the temple ceremonies again.

So, anyway, why exactly does the civil government of a pluralistic democratic nation with no established religion need to make its laws with reference to Leviticus, a book intended mainly for the Tribe of Levi, the Jewish priestly caste? In case you didn't notice, we don't have a Jewish king.

 

[Reformed Guy]

Well, good for him!  8)

No it isn't good for him and it isn't good for us.  It's an ABOMINATION.  Does that word mean anything at all to you-- expect something to applaud?

Yeah, abomination does mean something to me. It's an English word that has no exact equivalent in Hebrew. One of several Hebrew words often translated as "abomination" most often means "ritually unclean", requiring the appropriate Jewish cleansing rituals before one is able to participate in the temple ceremonies again.

So, anyway, why exactly does the civil government of a pluralistic democratic nation with no established religion need to make its laws with reference to Leviticus, a book intended mainly for the Tribe of Levi, the Jewish priestly caste? In case you didn't notice, we don't have a Jewish king.

Yes I've noticed that we do not have a Jewish king-- as did neither the inhabitants of the land before the Hebrews moved in--from whiuch they were spewedout because they had polluted the land with their abominations.

And yes, I'm aware that I live in a pluralistic democratic nation, which means that the creature is glorfied rather than the Creator and His truth is supressed in unrighteousness. 

The reason that our  pluralistic democratic nation needs to punish homosexuality with its laws is because God has declared it as evil and worthy of death both temporal and eternal. 

 

[Castor Muscular]

The only thing that has changed is that he's now telling the truth about his position on same-sex marriage.  Which makes this an historic occasion.  It may be the first time he's ever told the truth to the American people about anything.

 

[rsc2a]

Well, good for him!  8)

No it isn't good for him and it isn't good for us.  It's an ABOMINATION.  Does that word mean anything at all to you-- expect something to applaud?

Do you prefer your shrimp grilled or fried?

 

[ALAYMAN]

[quote author=rsc2a]
Do you prefer your shrimp grilled or fried?
[/quote]

More of your love for the essence of reformed thought driving your interprative apparatus here?



lol



/sarcasm

 

[Izdaari]

Well, good for him!  8)

No it isn't good for him and it isn't good for us.  It's an ABOMINATION.  Does that word mean anything at all to you-- expect something to applaud?

Yeah, abomination does mean something to me. It's an English word that has no exact equivalent in Hebrew. One of several Hebrew words often translated as "abomination" most often means "ritually unclean", requiring the appropriate Jewish cleansing rituals before one is able to participate in the temple ceremonies again.

So, anyway, why exactly does the civil government of a pluralistic democratic nation with no established religion need to make its laws with reference to Leviticus, a book intended mainly for the Tribe of Levi, the Jewish priestly caste? In case you didn't notice, we don't have a Jewish king.

Yes I've noticed that we do not have a Jewish king-- as did neither the inhabitants of the land before the Hebrews moved in--from whiuch they were spewedout because they had polluted the land with their abominations.

And yes, I'm aware that I live in a pluralistic democratic nation, which means that the creature is glorfied rather than the Creator and His truth is supressed in unrighteousness. 

The reason that our  pluralistic democratic nation needs to punish homosexuality with its laws is because God has declared it as evil and worthy of death both temporal and eternal.

Ok, now that we're clear that you're advocating theocracy, or at least theonomy, we have no common ground left to discuss politics at all.  :-X

 

[Headbutter of the gods]

Good for Barra Kabamma.

 

[Reformed Guy]

Well, good for him!  8)

No it isn't good for him and it isn't good for us.  It's an ABOMINATION.  Does that word mean anything at all to you-- expect something to applaud?

Do you prefer your shrimp grilled or fried?

Read Acts 10 and try to differentiate between the part that declares creeping critters clean and the part that declares creepy perverts clean.

 

[Reformed Guy]

Well, good for him!  8)

No it isn't good for him and it isn't good for us.  It's an ABOMINATION.  Does that word mean anything at all to you-- expect something to applaud?

Yeah, abomination does mean something to me. It's an English word that has no exact equivalent in Hebrew. One of several Hebrew words often translated as "abomination" most often means "ritually unclean", requiring the appropriate Jewish cleansing rituals before one is able to participate in the temple ceremonies again.

So, anyway, why exactly does the civil government of a pluralistic democratic nation with no established religion need to make its laws with reference to Leviticus, a book intended mainly for the Tribe of Levi, the Jewish priestly caste? In case you didn't notice, we don't have a Jewish king.

Yes I've noticed that we do not have a Jewish king-- as did neither the inhabitants of the land before the Hebrews moved in--from whiuch they were spewedout because they had polluted the land with their abominations.

And yes, I'm aware that I live in a pluralistic democratic nation, which means that the creature is glorfied rather than the Creator and His truth is supressed in unrighteousness. 

The reason that our  pluralistic democratic nation needs to punish homosexuality with its laws is because God has declared it as evil and worthy of death both temporal and eternal.

Ok, now that we're clear that you're advocating theocracy, or at least theonomy, we have no common ground left to discuss politics at all.  :-X

No more than Paul did when he declared in Romans 1 that homosexuality was an evil worthy of death (temporal and eternal).

What he makes "clear" is even more important-- and that is that suppressing the truth and condoning perversion in a "pluralistic" society marks one as a whelp of Satan rather than a child of God.

 

[rsc2a]

Well, good for him!  8)

No it isn't good for him and it isn't good for us.  It's an ABOMINATION.  Does that word mean anything at all to you-- expect something to applaud?

Do you prefer your shrimp grilled or fried?

Read Acts 10 and try to differentiate between the part that declares creeping critters clean and the part that declares creepy perverts clean.

I don't have a problem with you thinking homosexual activity is wrong. I would agree with you.

I have a problem with you using the levitical code as your basis. If you want to hold onto one part of the Law...

[quote author=Izdaari]

Ok, now that we're clear that you're advocating theocracy, or at least theonomy, we have no common ground left to discuss politics at all.  :-X

No more than Paul did when he declared in Romans 1 that homosexuality was an evil worthy of death (temporal and eternal).

What he makes "clear" is even more important-- and that is that suppressing the truth and condoning perversion in a "pluralistic" society marks one as a whelp of Satan rather than a child of God.
[/quote]

Paul also lumped kids that are disobedient to their parents in that list. Have you offered up your children to be stoned for disobedience or are you disobeying God?

 

[Reformed Guy]

Well, good for him!  8)

No it isn't good for him and it isn't good for us.  It's an ABOMINATION.  Does that word mean anything at all to you-- expect something to applaud?

Do you prefer your shrimp grilled or fried?

Read Acts 10 and try to differentiate between the part that declares creeping critters clean and the part that declares creepy perverts clean.

I don't have a problem with you thinking homosexual activity is wrong. I would agree with you.

I have a problem with you using the levitical code as your basis. If you want to hold onto one part of the Law...

[quote author=Izdaari]

Ok, now that we're clear that you're advocating theocracy, or at least theonomy, we have no common ground left to discuss politics at all.  :-X

No more than Paul did when he declared in Romans 1 that homosexuality was an evil worthy of death (temporal and eternal).

What he makes "clear" is even more important-- and that is that suppressing the truth and condoning perversion in a "pluralistic" society marks one as a whelp of Satan rather than a child of God.

Paul also lumped kids that are disobedient to their parents in that list. Have you offered up your children to be stoned for disobedience or are you disobeying God?
[/quote]

No, I have not.  Too date my kids have not been guilty of the crimes deserving of stoning.