Interesting Article On Obama's Accomplishments---From A Liberal Paper

T-Bone

New member
Doctor
Elect
Joined
Jan 25, 2012
Messages
3,769
Reaction score
2
Points
0
Age
65
Location
Arizona
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-boaz/obamas-accomplishments_b_1654836.html

As he runs for re-election, President Obama wants to point to his accomplishments in office. Trouble is, he's having trouble identifying them.

He killed Osama bin Laden, for sure. But after that...

He'd like to say that the economy is getting better, but the slow recovery is hampering his ability to sell that idea to the public. He likes to say that he saved General Motors and Chrysler; his critics argue that he really spent $23 billion of taxpayers' money to force the companies into bankruptcy and save the United Auto Workers Union. The president also has tried to claim that federal spending was increasing more slowly on his watch than in any presidency in 60 years, but the data don't bear out that narrative.

So the president's accomplishments are a little difficult to find. But I'm here to offer assistance. I've combed through the research, and unearthed some achievements the president can claim:

Most deportations. Despite his endorsement of the DREAM Act, President Obama has deported more illegal immigrants than any president in history. He's been deporting about 400,000 people a year, about double the number in the George W. Bush administration.

Most leaks prosecutions. The Obama administration has been criticized for leaking classified information in a series of campaigns to portray the president as a tough, engaged commander-in-chief. But meanwhile the administration information has used the 1917 Espionage Act to target suspected leakers in twice as many cases as all previous presidential administrations combined.

Most troops in Afghanistan. The United States had about 30,000 troops in Afghanistan during 2008, the last year of President Bush's term. By the end of 2010, President Obama had increased that number to almost 100,000. It's down to about 88,000 now, which still might surprise people who recall candidate Obama's ringing antiwar speeches of 2008.

Most medical marijuana raids. In March 2009 Attorney General Eric Holder said that the Justice Department would end the Bush administration policy of raiding medical marijuana distributors that violated federal statutes as long as the dispensaries appeared to be complying with state laws. Beginning later that year, however, as Lucia Graves reported at The Huffington Post,

"The administration has unleashed an interagency cannabis crackdown that goes beyond anything seen under the Bush administration, with more than 100 raids, primarily on California pot dispensaries, many of them operating in full compliance with state laws. Since October 2009, the Justice Department has conducted more than 170 aggressive SWAT-style raids in 9 medical marijuana states, resulting in at least 61 federal indictments."

Federal agents have seized property of landlords who rent space to medical marijuana dispensaries and have threatened to prosecute state employees who carry out state laws on medical marijuana.

Most drone strikes. President Obama doesn't like the way the Bush administration treated prisoners at Guantanamo, so he's taking fewer prisoners. The Obama administration has carried out at least 308 covert drone strikes in Pakistan, more than five times the 44 approved under Bush.

Most fundraisers. All presidents spend a lot of their time fundraising. But President Obama leads the league. Political scientist Brendan J. Doherty, author of the new book The Rise of the President's Permanent Campaign, reports that Obama had held 104 fundraisers by March 6, compared to 94 held by Presidents Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, George Bush, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush combined. CBS News White House correspondent Mark Knoller noted that by June 12 Obama had done 160 re-election fundraisers, twice as many as Bush by the same point in 2004.

The economy may not get much better this year, not with all the taxes, spending and regulation weighing it down. President Obama may be hoping to achieve the distinction of being the president reelected with the highest unemployment rate.

In the meantime, though, he's got a lot of accomplishments he could boast about -- if he dares.

David Boaz is executive vice president of the Cato Institute and author of Libertarianism: A Primer and The Politics of Freedom.
 
Though clearly the author is from the CATO Institute that I would put more in the libertarian camp than any other.

T-Bone said:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-boaz/obamas-accomplishments_b_1654836.html

As he runs for re-election, President Obama wants to point to his accomplishments in office. Trouble is, he's having trouble identifying them.

He killed Osama bin Laden, for sure. But after that...

He'd like to say that the economy is getting better, but the slow recovery is hampering his ability to sell that idea to the public. He likes to say that he saved General Motors and Chrysler; his critics argue that he really spent $23 billion of taxpayers' money to force the companies into bankruptcy and save the United Auto Workers Union. The president also has tried to claim that federal spending was increasing more slowly on his watch than in any presidency in 60 years, but the data don't bear out that narrative.

So the president's accomplishments are a little difficult to find. But I'm here to offer assistance. I've combed through the research, and unearthed some achievements the president can claim:

Most deportations. Despite his endorsement of the DREAM Act, President Obama has deported more illegal immigrants than any president in history. He's been deporting about 400,000 people a year, about double the number in the George W. Bush administration.

Most leaks prosecutions. The Obama administration has been criticized for leaking classified information in a series of campaigns to portray the president as a tough, engaged commander-in-chief. But meanwhile the administration information has used the 1917 Espionage Act to target suspected leakers in twice as many cases as all previous presidential administrations combined.

Most troops in Afghanistan. The United States had about 30,000 troops in Afghanistan during 2008, the last year of President Bush's term. By the end of 2010, President Obama had increased that number to almost 100,000. It's down to about 88,000 now, which still might surprise people who recall candidate Obama's ringing antiwar speeches of 2008.

Most medical marijuana raids. In March 2009 Attorney General Eric Holder said that the Justice Department would end the Bush administration policy of raiding medical marijuana distributors that violated federal statutes as long as the dispensaries appeared to be complying with state laws. Beginning later that year, however, as Lucia Graves reported at The Huffington Post,

"The administration has unleashed an interagency cannabis crackdown that goes beyond anything seen under the Bush administration, with more than 100 raids, primarily on California pot dispensaries, many of them operating in full compliance with state laws. Since October 2009, the Justice Department has conducted more than 170 aggressive SWAT-style raids in 9 medical marijuana states, resulting in at least 61 federal indictments."

Federal agents have seized property of landlords who rent space to medical marijuana dispensaries and have threatened to prosecute state employees who carry out state laws on medical marijuana.

Most drone strikes. President Obama doesn't like the way the Bush administration treated prisoners at Guantanamo, so he's taking fewer prisoners. The Obama administration has carried out at least 308 covert drone strikes in Pakistan, more than five times the 44 approved under Bush.

Most fundraisers. All presidents spend a lot of their time fundraising. But President Obama leads the league. Political scientist Brendan J. Doherty, author of the new book The Rise of the President's Permanent Campaign, reports that Obama had held 104 fundraisers by March 6, compared to 94 held by Presidents Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, George Bush, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush combined. CBS News White House correspondent Mark Knoller noted that by June 12 Obama had done 160 re-election fundraisers, twice as many as Bush by the same point in 2004.

The economy may not get much better this year, not with all the taxes, spending and regulation weighing it down. President Obama may be hoping to achieve the distinction of being the president reelected with the highest unemployment rate.

In the meantime, though, he's got a lot of accomplishments he could boast about -- if he dares.

David Boaz is executive vice president of the Cato Institute and author of Libertarianism: A Primer and The Politics of Freedom.
 
Yeah, Cato is a libertarian think tank, but still the Huffington Post editors liked the article enough to print it and thought their readers would enjoy it. I know Boaz, he's a good writer and good analyst. I think he nailed this one.
 
Izdaari said:
Yeah, Cato is a libertarian think tank, but still the Huffington Post editors liked the article enough to print it and thought their readers would enjoy it. I know Boaz, he's a good writer and good analyst. I think he nailed this one.

Most of the items that Boaz identified are foreign policy / military / personal liberty - type issues.  I think Boaz has a point here.  One of the great disappointments of the Obama adminstration is that they haven't ended the wars in the Mideast much earlier, and are still engaged in blatant human rights violations and violations of civil liberties.

Of course, the principal reason they haven't done this is because every time they make the tiniest motion in the direction of ending the Mideast wars or stopping the Guantanamo trials (for example), the rightwing hawks in Congress and the libertarian/conservative pundits on cable TV absolutely roast them over the coals, question the administration's resolve and portraying Obama and Democrats as appeasers and cowards. 

So it's rather hypocritical for the right-wing and libertarian organizations to blame the administration for these failures, when those exact same organziations are partly responsible for said failures because they punished the administration anytime they attempted to fix the issues.
 
redgreen5 said:
Izdaari said:
Yeah, Cato is a libertarian think tank, but still the Huffington Post editors liked the article enough to print it and thought their readers would enjoy it. I know Boaz, he's a good writer and good analyst. I think he nailed this one.

Most of the items that Boaz identified are foreign policy / military / personal liberty - type issues.  I think Boaz has a point here.  One of the great disappointments of the Obama adminstration is that they haven't ended the wars in the Mideast much earlier, and are still engaged in blatant human rights violations and violations of civil liberties.

Of course, the principal reason they haven't done this is because every time they make the tiniest motion in the direction of ending the Mideast wars or stopping the Guantanamo trials (for example), the rightwing hawks in Congress and the libertarian/conservative pundits on cable TV absolutely roast them over the coals, question the administration's resolve and portraying Obama and Democrats as appeasers and cowards. 

So it's rather hypocritical for the right-wing and libertarian organizations to blame the administration for these failures, when those exact same organziations are partly responsible for said failures because they punished the administration anytime they attempted to fix the issues.

This is true of the Weekly Standard bunch who are mostly neocons (not as popularly misused, but as in the intellectual progeny of Irving Horowitz and Norman Podhoretz). And many congressional Republicans, including some libertarian-leaning conservatives, are hawkish too.

But Cato, the Libertarian Party and other actual libertarians, such as Ron Paul, Gary Johnson, John Stossel and Judge Andrew Napolitano tend to side much more with the anti-war liberals on those kinds of foreign policy matters. Libertarians are not big fans of the PATRIOT Act, rendition, Guantanamo, etc. Conservatives often accuse us of being too radically non-interventionist, and I've made that criticism myself about Ron Paul.
 
Izdaari said:
redgreen5 said:
Izdaari said:
Yeah, Cato is a libertarian think tank, but still the Huffington Post editors liked the article enough to print it and thought their readers would enjoy it. I know Boaz, he's a good writer and good analyst. I think he nailed this one.

Most of the items that Boaz identified are foreign policy / military / personal liberty - type issues.  I think Boaz has a point here.  One of the great disappointments of the Obama adminstration is that they haven't ended the wars in the Mideast much earlier, and are still engaged in blatant human rights violations and violations of civil liberties.

Of course, the principal reason they haven't done this is because every time they make the tiniest motion in the direction of ending the Mideast wars or stopping the Guantanamo trials (for example), the rightwing hawks in Congress and the libertarian/conservative pundits on cable TV absolutely roast them over the coals, question the administration's resolve and portraying Obama and Democrats as appeasers and cowards. 

So it's rather hypocritical for the right-wing and libertarian organizations to blame the administration for these failures, when those exact same organziations are partly responsible for said failures because they punished the administration anytime they attempted to fix the issues.

This is true of the Weekly Standard bunch who are mostly neocons (not as popularly misused, but as in the intellectual progeny of Irving Horowitz and Norman Podhoretz). And many congressional Republicans, including some libertarian-leaning conservatives, are hawkish too.

But Cato, the Libertarian Party and other actual libertarians, such as Ron Paul, Gary Johnson, John Stossel and Judge Andrew Napolitano tend to side much more with the anti-war liberals on those kinds of foreign policy matters. Libertarians are not big fans of the PATRIOT Act, rendition, Guantanamo, etc. Conservatives often accuse us of being too radically non-interventionist, and I've made that criticism myself about Ron Paul.

There is, however, a "hawk" wing of libertarians that is populated by rabid pro-zionists, "manifest destiny" types, and the assorted British Imperialism followers.  You mentioned some of them above, of course.
 
redgreen5 said:
Izdaari said:
redgreen5 said:
Izdaari said:
Yeah, Cato is a libertarian think tank, but still the Huffington Post editors liked the article enough to print it and thought their readers would enjoy it. I know Boaz, he's a good writer and good analyst. I think he nailed this one.

Most of the items that Boaz identified are foreign policy / military / personal liberty - type issues.  I think Boaz has a point here.  One of the great disappointments of the Obama adminstration is that they haven't ended the wars in the Mideast much earlier, and are still engaged in blatant human rights violations and violations of civil liberties.

Of course, the principal reason they haven't done this is because every time they make the tiniest motion in the direction of ending the Mideast wars or stopping the Guantanamo trials (for example), the rightwing hawks in Congress and the libertarian/conservative pundits on cable TV absolutely roast them over the coals, question the administration's resolve and portraying Obama and Democrats as appeasers and cowards. 

So it's rather hypocritical for the right-wing and libertarian organizations to blame the administration for these failures, when those exact same organziations are partly responsible for said failures because they punished the administration anytime they attempted to fix the issues.

This is true of the Weekly Standard bunch who are mostly neocons (not as popularly misused, but as in the intellectual progeny of Irving Horowitz and Norman Podhoretz). And many congressional Republicans, including some libertarian-leaning conservatives, are hawkish too.

But Cato, the Libertarian Party and other actual libertarians, such as Ron Paul, Gary Johnson, John Stossel and Judge Andrew Napolitano tend to side much more with the anti-war liberals on those kinds of foreign policy matters. Libertarians are not big fans of the PATRIOT Act, rendition, Guantanamo, etc. Conservatives often accuse us of being too radically non-interventionist, and I've made that criticism myself about Ron Paul.

There is, however, a "hawk" wing of libertarians that is populated by rabid pro-zionists, "manifest destiny" types, and the assorted British Imperialism followers.  You mentioned some of them above, of course.

There are hawkish libertarians, and to some extent I am one myself. But I'm a moderate hawk, basically a traditional mainstream Republican on foreign policy, comfortable with Eisenhower, Nixon and Bush41 in that regard, but not with the neocons. That's not much like the nutbar variants you speak of. Nor have I personally encountered any examples of nutbar hawk libertarians. Dovish libertarians are by far the majority in the LP.
 
Back
Top